You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This clever operator I defined in order to validate the later modality rules without power objects being total can also be used to validate the intersection type rules, without using AUC. This would clean up some proofs and make them more systematic. I've already tried it out when proving that intersection commutes with sigma, and it worked really nicely there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This clever operator I defined in order to validate the later modality rules without power objects being total can also be used to validate the intersection type rules, without using AUC. This would clean up some proofs and make them more systematic. I've already tried it out when proving that intersection commutes with sigma, and it worked really nicely there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: