We'd love to have you join the community! Below summarizes the processes that we follow.
- Reporting Issues
- Submitting Pull Requests
- Sign your PRs
- Merge bot interaction
- Communications
- Becoming a Maintainer
Before reporting an issue, check our backlog of open issues to see if someone else has already reported it. If so, feel free to add your scenario, or additional information, to the discussion. Or simply "subscribe" to it to be notified when it is updated.
If you find a new issue with the project we'd love to hear about it! The most important aspect of a bug report is that it includes enough information for us to reproduce it. So, please include as much detail as possible and try to remove the extra stuff that doesn't really relate to the issue itself. The easier it is for us to reproduce it, the faster it'll be fixed!
Please don't include any private/sensitive information in your issue!
No Pull Request (PR) is too small! Typos, additional comments in the code, new testcases, bug fixes, new features, more documentation, ... it's all welcome!
While bug fixes can first be identified via an "issue", that is not required. It's ok to just open up a PR with the fix, but make sure you include the same information you would have included in an issue - like how to reproduce it.
PRs for new features should include some background on what use cases the new code is trying to address. When possible and when it makes sense, try to break-up larger PRs into smaller ones - it's easier to review smaller code changes. But only if those smaller ones make sense as stand-alone PRs.
Regardless of the type of PR, all PRs should include:
- well documented code changes
- additional testcases. Ideally, they should fail w/o your code change applied
- documentation changes
Squash your commits into logical pieces of work that might want to be reviewed separate from the rest of the PRs. But, squashing down to just one commit is ok too since in the end the entire PR will be reviewed anyway. When in doubt, squash.
PRs that fix issues should include a reference like Closes #XXXX
in the
commit message so that github will automatically close the referenced issue
when the PR is merged.
The sign-off is a line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your signature certifies that you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch. The rules are simple: if you can certify the below (from developercertificate.org):
Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1
Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
660 York Street, Suite 102,
San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
Then you just add a line to every git commit message:
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@email.com>
Use your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
If you set your user.name
and user.email
git configs, you can sign your
commit automatically with git commit -s
.
Maintainers should never merge anything directly into upstream branches. Instead, interact with the bors-ng bot through PR comments as summarized below. This ensures all upstream branches contain commits in a predictable order, and that every commit has passed automated testing at some point in the past. A Maintainer portal is available, showing all PRs awaiting review and approval.
Common bors-ng comment commands:
(must be on a single comment-line, without any other extraneous text)
bors r+
- Check the current number of Github Code-review Approvals. If the PR has that many approvals or more, the bot will add the PR into the queue for testing and possible merging. Both the success criteria and minimum approval number are set in the configuration file (see below).bors retry
- Re-run whatever request was previously issued to the bot. Useful when there was a testing flake upon attempted merge.bors try
- Optional / simulate the actions ofbors r+
(see above) having met the minimum number of required approvals. The result will be reported back as a comment in the PR, by the bors bot.bors ping
- Confirm bot is functioning, it will post a comment in the PR if so.
Bors-ng relies on the regular branch-testing occurring when it updates the special branches ('trying' or 'staging'). Therefore you may use the full capabilities available within the CI system. Note: A single bors-ng run may include multiple PRs at once.
The easiest way to access a running 'bors try' or 'bors r+' run, is by clicking the yellow-circle "status" icon that shows up in an affected PR, for example:
This will cause a pop-up window to appear with the relevant test-statuses and 'details' links available. Since bors-ng will wait for success, as long as one test is still running, it's possible to manually re-run any failed tests (e.g. due to flakes).
- The
bors.toml
file in the repository root. This controls runtime options for timeouts, blocking labels, and required status names. - The settings page. This contains mostly security-related and branch-control options.
For general questions or discussions, please use the
IRC group on irc.freenode.net
called buildah
that has been setup.
You can join the Buildah mailing list by sending an email to buildah-join@lists.buildah.io
with the word subscribe
in the subject. You can also go to this page, then scroll down to the bottom of the page and enter your email and optionally name, then click on the "Subscribe" button.
You can also use the github issues and PRs tracking system.
To become a maintainer you must first be nominated by an existing maintainer. If a majority (>50%) of maintainers agree then the proposal is adopted and you will be added to the list.
Removing a maintainer requires at least 75% of the remaining maintainers approval, or if the person requests to be removed then it is automatic. Normally, a maintainer will only be removed if they are considered to be inactive for a long period of time or are viewed as disruptive to the community.
The current list of maintainers can be found in the MAINTAINERS file.