Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
You are right, multiple targets were planned but are not supported at this point. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I forked and made some changes that seem to have solved it in my fork. When
I’m done testing I’ll send a pull request.
…On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 5:00 PM Maximilian Lindner ***@***.***> wrote:
You are right, multiple targets were planned but are not supported at this
point.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#677 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWKSIX3WJ5EKMYK2JL455LXSV2WHANCNFSM6AAAAAA23QXFL4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Cool! Looking foreward to the PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The documentation for the
add_targetmethod ofSessionindicates that multiple targets will be parallelized when fuzzing. In practice it seems that only the first target is ever used. Some quick review of the code shows thattarget[0]is used all through theSessionclass. Is this an unfinished feature or am I just missing something?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions