-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preposal Storage RemoteStorageJS or SQLite.JS #211
Comments
I don't see the benefit of a backend for SQLite.js, as that just mutates an in-memory SQL database (what are the advantages over the in-memory file system?). RemoteStorageJS could be a cool file system backend addition; I'd welcome PRs for that, so long as we can set up unit tests for it somehow. |
Well since SQLite.js it a Emscripten fork of SQLite the purpose was to achieve total compatibility with any SQL management tool besides storing the data hosted where the script is runned by simply adding SQLite.JS to the application, RemoteStorageJS is indeed a cool feature. Keep up the great work. Cheers |
Please use https://github.com/browser-fs/core/issues/12 |
It would be nice to have the abillity to set up remote IndexedDB databases, this can be done with RemoteStorageJS, also PHP IndexedBD servers can be set up. Just a enhancement suggestion. Another option can be SQLite.JS Keep up the great work. Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: