Replies: 3 comments
-
The web version uses a long outdated version of BirdNET, as far as I know. But people still seem to use it a lot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
People are using it because it's easily accessible (no installation required) and they also believe its results accurately represent the BirdNET model's capabilities |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, I added a few hints on the upload page that specify the model version as V1.0 (the one from the original BirdNET paper). We'll update the demo page and replace it with a Gradio interface just like the Single File analysis tab. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have been using BirdNET web analyzer at https://birdnet.cornell.edu/api/ to verify some of BirdNET-Go captures and I have been wondering why web analyzer produces so different results. Today I installed BirdNET Analyzer Win GUI 1.3.1 version and it produces same results as BirdNET-Go.
Here are example results for same file analyzed in Web version and v1.3.1 Windows GUI version
Web version results are so way off that I would recommend taking it offline until it is fixed
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions