From 0eb5468c033be2557e2aedf9547b4e415bdb8b64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: andytudhope <13001517+andytudhope@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 22:08:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] perfect as a process of giving
---
content/en/learn/module-7/giving.mdx | 6 ++++--
content/en/learn/module-7/perfection.mdx | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/content/en/learn/module-7/giving.mdx b/content/en/learn/module-7/giving.mdx
index 80c986181a..ce150afbb6 100644
--- a/content/en/learn/module-7/giving.mdx
+++ b/content/en/learn/module-7/giving.mdx
@@ -119,14 +119,16 @@ Scarcity.
-While we feel that some of his work may come across to many as idealistic, we think he poses a genuinely fascinating [question](/learn/module-2/better-questions/): **can we co-create sacred economic environments**?
+While we feel that some of his work may come across to many as idealistic, we think Charles Eisenstein poses a genuinely fascinating question:
+
+> 💡 **Can we co-create sacred economic environments**?
The sacred is that which is bigger than 'me' and simultaneously something in which one can
participate, of which one is intimately a part. The sacred simply gives meaning to our lives;
nothing more, nothing less. This is why the most potent gifts - sacrifices - are always at the
heart of sacred ritual and initiatory rite.
-> 💡 **What does it mean to imagine a web of smart contracts as ceremonial transactional space?**
+> 💡 **What if we imagined smart contracts as ceremonial transactional space?**
diff --git a/content/en/learn/module-7/perfection.mdx b/content/en/learn/module-7/perfection.mdx
index 0cdf2479a2..f344abeca9 100644
--- a/content/en/learn/module-7/perfection.mdx
+++ b/content/en/learn/module-7/perfection.mdx
@@ -9,11 +9,13 @@ featuredImage: images/shares/learn.png
# 🙊 Perfecting Language
+
Nor grieve, dear heart,
nor fear the seeming.
Here is waking in the dreaming.
-– [Abraham Merritt](http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks06/0602001h.html) (adapted)
+– Abraham Merritt (adapted)
+
Is it possible to guard effectively against the inertia of language? Arguably, we cannot