Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automating regular website checks #1187

Open
KaKi87 opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Automating regular website checks #1187

KaKi87 opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@KaKi87
Copy link
Contributor

KaKi87 commented Jun 7, 2023

If I understand the FAQ correctly, regular website checks are done manually, but did you consider automating these ?

@kevquirk
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the delay in reply - only just saw this.

We kinda do. We have scripts we run to check them, but it's still fairly manual. If you have any ideas to fully automate it, I'd love to hear them. Unfortunately, a lot of the services out there that can do this kind of thing cost money.

@KaKi87
Copy link
Contributor Author

KaKi87 commented Aug 17, 2023

So you're paying for the GTMetrix API ?

Otherwise I would suggest performing measurements using a headless browser.

@kevquirk
Copy link
Owner

No, we're not at the moment, because it's so manual. If we wanted to fully automate checking for both size changes and whether they're still up, we'd need to (I think).

@KaKi87
Copy link
Contributor Author

KaKi87 commented Aug 17, 2023

A headless browser can do these as well.

@garritfra
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this thread is relevant: #749

I'll dig into that later today, it's been a while.

@NeonGamerBot-QK
Copy link
Contributor

NeonGamerBot-QK commented Sep 2, 2024

A headless browser can do these as well.

this is def possible and can be done easily in a gh action.
( i could spin up a pr for it)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants