You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
a variant of match would take an AxiomOrClaimName for the pattern that is used as LHS;
match would work on arbitrary patterns (in the spirit of syntacticMatch). That should not break correctness (since, e.g., phi(1)/\psi(2) --> \exists x. psi(x) /\ phi(1)), but the strategy would be more general. Moreover, it would allow us to remove the fail cases where a checks isPredicatePattern and isSpatialPattern are used, since a spatial pattern together with predicate pattern would not match. (I belive that removal of one case of isSpatialPattern is a good thing, since it is SL-specific.)
Also, filterPredicates is defined but never used, so we may remove it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I propose that
match
would take anAxiomOrClaimName
for the pattern that is used as LHS;syntacticMatch
). That should not break correctness (since, e.g.,phi(1)/\psi(2) --> \exists x. psi(x) /\ phi(1)
), but the strategy would be more general. Moreover, it would allow us to remove thefail
cases where a checksisPredicatePattern
andisSpatialPattern
are used, since a spatial pattern together with predicate pattern would not match. (I belive that removal of one case ofisSpatialPattern
is a good thing, since it is SL-specific.)Also,
filterPredicates
is defined but never used, so we may remove it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: