You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is reasonably easy to force with some in the first column, and filling other columns with buttons
Anyways the resolution for me was to switch use the following css. I didn't want to do a pull request, b/c I am guessing there is a reason for the relative positioning vs. the solution below. And i wanted to understand before doing a pull request.
It is reasonably easy to force with some in the first column, and filling other columns with buttons
Anyways the resolution for me was to switch use the following css. I didn't want to do a pull request, b/c I am guessing there is a reason for the relative positioning vs. the solution below. And i wanted to understand before doing a pull request.
.tree-grid .level-1 td:first-child {
padding-left: 0px;
}
.tree-grid .level-2 td:first-child {
padding-left: 20px;
}
.tree-grid .level-3 td:first-child {
padding-left: 40px;
}
.tree-grid .level-4 td:first-child {
padding-left: 60px;
}
.tree-grid .level-5 td:first-child {
padding-left: 80px;
}
.tree-grid .level-6 td:first-child {
padding-left: 100px;
}
.tree-grid .level-7 td:first-child {
padding-left: 120px;
}
.tree-grid .level-8 td:first-child {
padding-left: 140px;
}
.tree-grid .level-9 td:first-child {
padding-left: 160px;
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: