You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi I'm curious about how scoring works when there are results that have a lot more values for the keys than others. For example I'm using Fuse to search on both a name and possible synonyms. The name has a one-to-many relationship with the synonyms. I'm seeing that one of our names, which has many more synonyms than the other names is towards the top of the list every time, no matter what I search on. Updating the key weight does help, but the many synonym name is still towards the top. All search terms, names, and synonyms are relatively short. (<60 characters) I'm curious if I can get a bit more of a breakdown into how the scores work. Are relevance scores aggregated across all keys?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi I'm curious about how scoring works when there are results that have a lot more values for the keys than others. For example I'm using Fuse to search on both a name and possible synonyms. The name has a one-to-many relationship with the synonyms. I'm seeing that one of our names, which has many more synonyms than the other names is towards the top of the list every time, no matter what I search on. Updating the key weight does help, but the many synonym name is still towards the top. All search terms, names, and synonyms are relatively short. (<60 characters) I'm curious if I can get a bit more of a breakdown into how the scores work. Are relevance scores aggregated across all keys?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions