Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Needs based queue selection #2503

Open
3 tasks
KPostOffice opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks

Needs based queue selection #2503

KPostOffice opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@KPostOffice
Copy link

What would you like to be added:

If I have multiple queues available to me, I would like to have the ability to choose a queue based off of labels indicating capabilities provided by that queue.

Why is this needed:

I have nodes which all provide a number of nvidia.com/gpu. Not captured in this is the GPU model provided by this node. I can create ClusterQueues which only have resource flavors that point at specific models. I would like the ability to label these ClusterQueues with the models and any other specifics about the ClusterQueues. Then, within a workload I would like to be able to specify these labels i.e.:

...
  selectors:
  - listType: allOf
    labels: [CUDAXX]
  - listType: oneOf
    labels: [A100, H100] 

or

...
  selectors:
  - listType: NoneOf
    labels: [GPU] 

Completion requirements:
API change for ClusterQueues/LocalQueues allowing for labeling based off of provided capabilities and changes to scheduling algorithm to allow for labels based scheduling.

This enhancement requires the following artifacts:

  • Design doc
  • API change
  • Docs update

The artifacts should be linked in subsequent comments.

@KPostOffice KPostOffice added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jun 28, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 26, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants