-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document provenance of reference atomic configurations #226
Comments
(BTW for json-formatted reference configurations it's even easier to add a comment field. Just add a new entry labelled "comment" and all our readers should ignore it.) |
I agree with you the json format is perfect for that and it is more convenient to have self documenting files. |
Should everyone change her/his contributions in #181 or how will we handle this? |
I think it would be best if everyone took a bit and identified which data files came from them or that inputs:
tests_only:
unused:
|
And directly change it in #230 ? |
The But yes, let's merge the PR first and then add these as we go along in another branch. |
Max, can you check off the files that belong to you? |
Mine, according to "user" tag are
I am writing them here for reference. Should everybody do her/his own PR for the metadata change? Again just for reference,I'll also claim:
I start a Draft-PR with my changes and people can alter their claimed jsons |
Draft PR branch open to every file-claimer at #236 |
Spun off from #181 (see here): We have many atomic configurations just called e.g.
methane.xyz
andH2O.xyz
, and it might be useful to know how the geometry itself was obtained (from a database, or optimized, and if so, with which method?). These can be added as a comment in the (extended) XYZ file itself, by adding a tag likecomment="from GDB9, re-optimized with B3LYP/6-31G*"
to the comment line).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: