-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is it possible to train and predict a per-atom property? [question] #407
Comments
If the related librascal/examples/needs_updating/Precition_example.ipynb could be updated |
Hi Francois, Yes, you can use librascal to predict per-atom properties. Basically, you just need to create a As for the Hope this helps, [*] note that this function is due to be replaced by a simplified version in #305, though the replacement will still support fitting with per-atom properties. |
Thanks for some feedback Max. I have some more questions: Is there a recommended tool to save molecules in xyz format? In case I have a property of interest per-atom, should it also be included in this .xyz file somehow, or should it be provided separately? |
librascal is compatible with ASE, so you can use e.g.
Either way will work, but for book-keeping and organization it helps to store the data in the XYZ file. You can do this in ASE, for example, by storing numpy arrays into the |
I had to retrieve this old version:
So that examples/SOAP_example.ipynb exists (I hope it is working in this version). |
Hello,
I'd like to give a try at librascal and SOAP features (probably using GPR).
While reading librascal/examples/needs_updating/Precition_example.ipynb;
I understand that you train/test using a property for each molecule.
I wonder if it possible to train/test using a property per atom of the molecule;
instead of a property for the whole molecule.
Would you have some example for that?
Thanks a lot,
Francois.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: