Skip to content

Translators in GA3H #29

Answered by laffernandes
CaseySanchez asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I believe the problem is the model of geometry used in both cases. I believe the problem is the model of geometry used in both cases.

Please check if with Ganja you are using PGA while with GATL you are using the homogeneous model of geometry. The difference between the two is in the metric of space. With PGA e0 . e0 = 0 while in the homogenous model e0 . e0 = 1. As a consequence of the metric, the homogeneous model does not have translators, only rotors.

The inclusion of PGA in GATL is on my to-do list. For now, you can declate the model following the example available at https://github.com/laffernandes/gatl/blob/master/cpp/tools/example/miscelaneos/general_metric.cpp

For computational e…

Replies: 1 comment 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@CaseySanchez
Comment options

CaseySanchez May 4, 2022
Collaborator Author

@laffernandes
Comment options

Answer selected by CaseySanchez
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants