Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WAN geo-replication support #275

Open
deajan opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

WAN geo-replication support #275

deajan opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@deajan
Copy link

deajan commented Jan 7, 2025

First of all, sorry if this isn't the "good place" to post this. I've tried to register with slack first, but I don't have a "@leil.io" mail as requested for registering.

I'm currently investigating multiple technologies to achieve HA Linux KVM clusters, solutions considered being Storwind vSan, DRBD/OCFS2, MooseFS/LizardFS and Ceph.
One of my customers needs to have geo-replication for disaster recovery. So far, Linbit provides DRBD Proxy, and LizardFS claims to have geo-replication support on their website.

While comparing solutions, I've found SaunaFS. I've tried to read through the SaunaFS docs, but didn't find any geo replication documentation.
Can SaunaFS be used for geo-replication (WAN links with roughly 10ms latency, ie use async writes and cache whenever link is down) ?
And, since it seems to be a fairly new project, Is SaunaFS "production ready" ?
And last, I've seen the RPM build script dir, is RHEL ecosystem support a goal for SaunaFS ?

Thank you for any insight.

@ar-leil
Copy link

ar-leil commented Jan 7, 2025

Hi @deajan, thanks for reaching out. Slack link should work for everyone externally.

As for your initial question, it is not a part of the main code and is not supported as a native feature but this is what supported with certain constraints. If you'd like to talk it further, let's proceed in email (ar@leil.io).

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants