You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was contacted by @maciekboni who recommended the Δm, n, 2 statistic. It looks very relevant for the case of two potential parent lineages.
Still I did not find time to take a closer look, and make up my mind if/how it fits with my mid-term plans of adjusting my algorithms, especially to include the individual mutation prevalences (#15) into the calculation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was contacted by @maciekboni who recommended the Δm, n, 2 statistic. It looks very relevant for the case of two potential parent lineages.
Still I did not find time to take a closer look, and make up my mind if/how it fits with my mid-term plans of adjusting my algorithms, especially to include the individual mutation prevalences (#15) into the calculation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: