You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
See previous discussion in #176. I open a new issue here since the discussion in #176 also involved another failing test and I think it is becoming difficult to get an overview.
$ prove -lv t/SF.t
[...]
ok 22 - gsl_sf_fermi_dirac_m1_e(10.0, $r) ?= 0.999954602131298, # TODO loss of precision on Perls with DUSELONGDOUBLE
# res= +-0, eps=2.21777808290173e-17
#
[...]
sub TEST_RT66882 : Tests {
# This test was losing a small amount of precision with
# perls that have DUSELONGDOUBLE, so give it some leeway
# Where is the loss of precision coming from? Is it a bug in Perl, GSL or Math::GSL ?
# A beer if you figure it out.
# why doesn't $TODO work here?
local $TODO = "loss of precision on Perls with DUSELONGDOUBLE";
# additional diagnostics
local %ENV; $ENV{DEBUG} = 1;
my $results = {
'gsl_sf_fermi_dirac_m1_e(10.0, $r)' => 0.9999546021312975656,
};
verify_results($results, 'Math::GSL::SF', 1e-16);
}
I sent an email to the cpantester Slaven Rezic regarding this failed test, and I got the following response:
Hello Håkon,
The full output of this test case is
# result->err: 2.21777808290172611e-19
# result->val: 0.99995460213129761
# expected : 0.999954602131297566
# difference : 4.401860820291148e-17
# unexpected error of 2.18408273738942189e-17
not ok 22 - gsl_sf_fermi_dirac_m1_e(10.0, $r) ?= 0.99995460213129761,
# res= +-4.401860820291148e-17, eps=2.21777808290172611e-17 # TODO loss of precision on Perls with DUSELONGDOUBLE
# Failed (TODO) test 'gsl_sf_fermi_dirac_m1_e(10.0, $r) ?= 0.99995460213129761,
# res= +-4.401860820291148e-17, eps=2.21777808290172611e-17'
# at t/SF.t line 43.
# (in Math::GSL::SF::Test->TEST_RT66882)
# '4.401860820291148e-17'
# <=
# '2.21777808290172611e-17'
So there's a "TODO" indication, but IMHO on the wrong line --- it should be on the the same line as the corresponding "not ok".
Some tests later there's a TODO indication which works:
not ok 1073 - gsl_sf_bessel_kl_scaled_array(1,1) lives # TODO gsl_sf_bessel_kl_scaled_array is missing
# Failed (TODO) test 'gsl_sf_bessel_kl_scaled_array(1,1) lives '
# at t/SF.t line 1341.
# (in Math::GSL::SF::Test->TEST_ZBESSEL_ARRAYS)
# died: Undefined subroutine &Math::GSL::SF::gsl_sf_bessel_kl_scaled_array called at t/SF.t line 1340.
Regards,
Slaven
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Temporary fix for failed test for perl 5.20.1 on FreeBSD. This test
should actually never fail since it is marked as TODO. But still it
somehow failed on FreeBSD. By commenting out the code that fails we
force the test to succeed (i.e. not to be run).
See previous discussion in #176. I open a new issue here since the discussion in #176 also involved another failing test and I think it is becoming difficult to get an overview.
So this issue is about the first failed test for perl 5.20.1 on FreeBSD, it says:
It I try run the
SF.t
test by it self:So test #22 in
SF.t
seems to be this one TEST_RT66882:The RT ticket: Fails on perls compiled with -Duselongdouble. The strange thing is that it is already a TODO test and as the comment says "why doesn't $TODO work here?"
I sent an email to the cpantester Slaven Rezic regarding this failed test, and I got the following response:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: