Default view for curators

[lfoppiano]

Which fields does curators need to be visible by default, in the table?

[kensei-te]

What I want is the following:

Raw material
Formula
Doping
Variables
Critical Temperature
Applied Pressure
Measurement Method
Expt/Calc <------ needs to be added #118
ID <------ needs to be added #59
Document
DOI
Status
Error Type <------ needs to be added #72 #89
Checked <------ needs to be added #81
Actions

, like attached pic. Is it possible to show the same also for pdf viewer? In pdf viewer, we would like to have ID and checked(validated, if you prefer). Otherwise, we can easily get lost

.

[lfoppiano]

@ktkktkt how should we provide "expt/calc"?

[kensei-te]

Hmmm. We know that "resistivity", "magnetization", "specific heat" are expt and "calc" is calc. Is it possible for us to construct a classification model, that classifies the item would be experimental or theoretical, depending on context? If it is not easy, this will be mostly provided by curator.

[lfoppiano]

I see. I think we need more data for a classifier.

These are my assumptions:

• in general the measurements are experimental, unless stated, however we might have exception to this
• if me_method is available then it should be straightforward and some regex should work

My proposal would be that we add just one checkbox that would say calc: yes / no and when it's not set for lack of information, we assume it's experimental. In this way my idea is that the curator has to do less work instead of selecting "exp" which would be the case most of the time..

[kensei-te]

I see. I think we need more data for a classifier.

These are my assumptions:

• in general the measurements are experimental, unless stated, however we might have exception to this
• if me_method is available then it should be straightforward and some regex should work

My proposal would be that we add just one checkbox that would say calc: yes / no and when it's not set for lack of information, we assume it's experimental. In this way my idea is that the curator has to do less work instead of selecting "exp" which would be the case most of the time..

I agree with your proposal. That would work fine.

[lfoppiano]

For expt/calc it's a duplication of information as the same is contained in the column "mesurement method" so we would need the set of rule/expressions (e.g. resistivity -> expt, calculated -> calc, heat -> expt, ....) to know when is expt, and when is calc.

@t29mato you could add an additional column that is called "measurement_type" which has possible values: "experimental", "calculated"

[t29mato]

measurement_methods.txt
I referenced the DB (falcon.nims.go.jp:27017/supercon_dev_1203) and found 378 unique measurement methods.
I thought it would be better to add or review the rules.

[kensei-te]

@t29mato you could add an additional column that is called "measurement_type" which has possible values: "experimental", "calculated"

I agree with mato-san's opinion. I wrote the same at issues/118. Sorry for overlapping topic in different issue.

[lfoppiano]

Let's discuss this issue on #118