We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If a case class does not have a companion object, the following error message appears:
error: illegal combination of modifiers: abstract and static [ERROR] static public abstract R apply () ; [ERROR] ^
In JDK 8 using abstract and static is considered a warning. In JDK 11 this is an error.
A case class can be used without needing a companion object.
To reproduce this issue, it is enough to create a file containing:
case class MyCaseClass() {}
However, the following does not have any problems:
case class MyCaseClass() {} object MyCaseClass {}
In the generated Java code, one can see the difference. In the first case we see:
public class MyCaseClass implements scala.Product, java.io.Serializable { static public abstract R apply () ; static public java.lang.String toString () { throw new RuntimeException(); } public MyCaseClass () { throw new RuntimeException(); } }
In the second case we see:
public class MyCaseClass implements scala.Product, java.io.Serializable { public MyCaseClass () { throw new RuntimeException(); } }
This was compiled with:
These issues could be related: #181 #154
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
problem
If a case class does not have a companion object, the following error message appears:
In JDK 8 using abstract and static is considered a warning. In JDK 11 this is an error.
expectation
A case class can be used without needing a companion object.
reproduction
To reproduce this issue, it is enough to create a file containing:
However, the following does not have any problems:
In the generated Java code, one can see the difference. In the first case we see:
In the second case we see:
configuration
This was compiled with:
related issues
These issues could be related:
#181
#154
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: