-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The performance of DDAG on RegDB #5
Comments
I suppose you might have made a mistake in the visible-to-infrared setting. Just keep all the settings as default (Do not change the test_mode in [Line 69]), since this represents the feature extraction mode. The only thing you need to change is the distance computation, changing the query and gallery setting. |
The visible-to-infrared setting is that Testing trial is only for RegDB dataset. Can you explain it in detail? |
You may refer to the baseline code at test.py in Line 254. Other parts are kept the same. |
This paper reports that DDGA is evaluated under both visible-to-infrared and infrared-to-visible query settings.
I re-implemented the code you published without making any changes. I obtain 31.25% map under visible to infrared setting, which is much more lower than 61.80% map reported in your paper. Under infrared to visible setting, similar results (61.97 vs 63.46) is still found.
Thanks in advances.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: