We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The example
\overbrace{{}+2}
produces the incorrect enriched MathML:
<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-OP MJX-fixedlimits"> <munder> <mrow type="overscore" role="addition" id="4" children="2,3"> <mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> </mrow> <mrow type="prefixop" role="addition" id="2" children="1" content="0" parent="4"> <mo type="operator" role="addition" id="0" parent="2" operator="prefixop,+">+</mo> <mn type="number" role="integer" font="normal" id="1" parent="2">2</mn> </mrow> <mo accent="true" type="fence" role="overaccent" id="3" parent="4">⏞</mo> </mrow> </munder> </mrow> </math>
(Here, the brace has been added to the base, and there is no second element to the <munder>.)
<munder>
This comes from this forum post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that \overbrace{1+2} works as expected, so the empty braces seem to be the issue.
\overbrace{1+2}
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The example
produces the incorrect enriched MathML:
(Here, the brace has been added to the base, and there is no second element to the
<munder>
.)This comes from this forum post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: