Replies: 7 comments 2 replies
-
Hi Rachel, thanks for reaching us. We'll look into this and provide you a guidelines tomorrow. BR, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I realized some of the under the hood parameters are not available. I ended up trying this out and it seemed to work:
I also tried adding I would still appreciate whatever advice you have. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
By default no, we have various presets for assemble step for different types of data (eg tagged or not tagged). The I am looking forward to your feedback, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for providing the custom preset file! I have tried it on my data and it works. It looks like this new preset reduces the number of noisy clone and results in more reads for the dominant clones, which is great! I was wondering if this is a result of different filtering or correction settings in the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have also sequenced this type of library using Nanopore sequencing and I want to do the same cell-level assembly. I see that there are some specific settings for aligning and assembling Nanopore reads. link. I know how to remove the R2 tag patters. What fields should I include to optimize mixcr for nanopore? I think for the chemistry version we are using, the error rate is about 1%. The extra configs for Do I add these overides for assemble:
inheritFrom: assemble-base
overrides:
clnaOutput: true
cloneAssemblerParameters:
badQualityThreshold: 0
minimalQuality: 15
cloneClusteringParameters:
clusteringFilter:
type: relativeConcentration
specificMutationProbability: 0.01 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you so much!
and corresponding whitelist config:
I had demultiplexed my samples based on i5/i7 index already with cutadapt, but I kept the adapters in the read for troubleshooting. So I am designating the i5/i7 index as cell barcodes instead of sample barcodes. I noticed that the bestHit for V/J gene do not have allele information. If I want to change the path of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have a TCR amplicon library made from single cells with primers in V and C regions. Cell-barcodes were inserted after C Region, and another ID sequence inserted before the V region (sequence differs for TRAV and TRAB). R1 starts form the UMI+C region, and R2 starts from the ID+V region.
I considered using the
generic-tcr-amplicon-umi
preset but I was concerned that it would get confused by TRA and TRB genes sharing a barcode. What preset should I use that would allow for cell-barcode correction without handling UMI?Also, what preset should I use for alignment? A lot of TCR tutorials in documentation uses
-p default_4.0
. Should I use that orgeneric-tcr-amplicon
?I have set floatLeftBound=true for gene regions where primers are used as I saw in the documentation guides.
However, I am curious about why the default values use local alignment for V right bound and J left bound, but global alignment for C Left Bound?
After alignment, what settings should I use for
refineTagsAndSort
to correct theCELL
barcodes?Many thanks! I appreciate all the features, documentation, and examples you provided!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions