Any specific use case for supporting only VARCHAR datatype and not NVARCHAR #22871
ade-owasp-sf
started this conversation in
Ideas & Feature requests
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Agree, it is valuable for Unicode strings. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Bump, is there any solution to this yet? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Not yet. I suppose NVARCHAR is a new data type of field. So far we haven't put it in our plan. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Any specific use case for supporting only VARCHAR datatype and not NVARCHAR
With NVARCHAR there will be less code page issues.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions