You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"update" is not "upgrade"
I should not have to type "luet upgrade" TWICE IN A ROW to make sure it actually does what "upgrade" means.
equo had update/upgrade separation. This made sense.
This is non-idempotent as it stands now. The same command, at 2 different states of the repository up-to-dateness, creates 2 different outcomes. This is wrong.
If you are going to take out "update", then for the love of all that is good, make "upgrade" finish the repo update AND the file/package upgrade IN THE SAME SINGLE COMMAND STEP.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If those commands exist, why does it not say 'instead of upgrade, try updating your repository first'?
I like a single command to do the same and only one thing if I invoke it multiple times.
"update" is not "upgrade"
I should not have to type "luet upgrade" TWICE IN A ROW to make sure it actually does what "upgrade" means.
equo had update/upgrade separation. This made sense.
This is non-idempotent as it stands now. The same command, at 2 different states of the repository up-to-dateness, creates 2 different outcomes. This is wrong.
If you are going to take out "update", then for the love of all that is good, make "upgrade" finish the repo update AND the file/package upgrade IN THE SAME SINGLE COMMAND STEP.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: