Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we support doi info for bonded potentials? #451

Open
rsdefever opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Should we support doi info for bonded potentials? #451

rsdefever opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@rsdefever
Copy link
Member

Thought motivated by foyer #360.

I think this seems like a sensible thing to do. Depending on the force field, and particularly in the case of custom built force fields, the bonded and non-bonded parameters may come from different publications. It seems reasonable to at least support this option.

Thoughts?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rsdefever