Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specifying forcefields to specific residues #751

Closed
bc118 opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Specifying forcefields to specific residues #751

bc118 opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@bc118
Copy link
Contributor

bc118 commented Jun 18, 2020

In some cases, I would like to individually select force fields for a specific residue. For example, instances like the attached Pore_Builder_Example [https://github.com/rmatsum836/Pore-Builder], as we will be working with a modified graphene structure in a similar fashion.

We have built a patch to do this for the GOMC and LAMMPS writer files. However, we would like to discuss if this should be put in foyer instead of the GOMC and LAMMPS write functions? Also, should this be done now or should we wait until it is GMSO is implemented?

Additionally, Ray has done something similar a while back Rays_code. Ray used dictionaries instead of the lists that were used in my example below (list were utilized as these inputs are existing in the compound.save functions), but both are doing the same task.

The example code is attached.
Specific_FF_to_residue.zip

Lastly, if we build this into foyer/GMSO we may want it to atom type a residue and then copy the values to the same residues. This may allow the FF application to not take excessively long with 100k atoms, etc.

Please provide your thoughts and feedback.

Thanks,

Brad

@CalCraven
Copy link
Contributor

Closed with addition of GMSO parameterization

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants