-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proof for chapter 17, H4 #7
Comments
you're right! He didnt use the properity of integral domains. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Ch17, 8.4: Prove "in any integral domain, only 1 and -1 are their own multiplicative inverses"
I don't quite get the solution; seems like the proof assumes "only 1 and -1 are their own multiplicative inverses". Please correct me if I am wrong! But I think I do have another proof:
Instead of solving
a*a=1
, we could leta=1+x
, then solve(1+x)(1+x)=1
, which expands to1+x+x+x*x = 1
, sox(1+1+x)=0
. Integral domains do not have divisors of zero (theorem 2 on page 174), so at least one ofx
and1+1+x
must be zero (page 173), so eitherx=0
orx=-1-1
;a=1
ora=-1
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: