Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconsider naming convention for "vehicle_representation" #61

Closed
cfirth-nasa opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Reconsider naming convention for "vehicle_representation" #61

cfirth-nasa opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@cfirth-nasa
Copy link
Contributor

Was brought up that the name "vehicle_representation" maybe does not fully represent the work that the class it creates actually does. "Vehicle_representation" suggests health/housekeeping (to me), whereas the actual class carries something more like a state space (containing information about the platform/system AND the environment). Is there a more accurate name for this subsystem?

@asgibson
Copy link
Contributor

Here's a few ideas:
CognitiveEntityModel
AdaptiveEntity
AutonomousUnit
AutoBot (but then we'd need a rival class called Decepticon 😏)

@cfirth-nasa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Renamed to knowledge representation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants