Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DSST internal Neurobagel node and query #8

Open
6 of 10 tasks
Tracked by #11
surchs opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
6 of 10 tasks
Tracked by #11

DSST internal Neurobagel node and query #8

surchs opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Milestone Used to track other issues that are required to complete the milestone.

Comments

@surchs
Copy link
Contributor

surchs commented Aug 29, 2023

Context

The https://cmn.nimh.nih.gov/dsst group wants to explore having an internal Neurobagel endpoint for some of the intramural data, so that local users can search across datasets for participants that fit certain cohort criteria.
This is similar to the https://github.com/neurobagel/project/issues/105 milestone because it is an internal deployment.
Our main goal at this point is making sure our docs and tools meet the needs of an internal deployment - so feedback.
In the mid-term, DSST may be interested in

  • read-only federation with our public endpoints
  • spinning up a public endpoint for their own data

Why

Outcomes

  • DSST has a running internal neurobagel instance (on local hardware)
  • Two local (not necessarily local) datasets are annotated and ingested
  • intramural query is running and provides access info to local filesystem
  • We have feedback for the deployment docs and the query

What

@surchs surchs added the Milestone Used to track other issues that are required to complete the milestone. label Aug 29, 2023
@surchs surchs changed the title DSST internal Neurobagel endpoint and query DSST internal Neurobagel node and query Nov 13, 2023
@surchs
Copy link
Contributor Author

surchs commented Nov 27, 2023

Eric is currently occupied with other projects, we'll wait until the new year to follow up with the implementation steps.

@rmanaem
Copy link
Contributor

rmanaem commented May 3, 2024

Since we decided to stick with the version 2+ of docker compose we need to reach out to Adam or Eric to see if they can update their server on their end to be able to deploy our stack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Milestone Used to track other issues that are required to complete the milestone.
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants