Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about annotation #2

Open
ChuanxinSong opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Question about annotation #2

ChuanxinSong opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ChuanxinSong
Copy link

Hi, thanks a lot for your contribution.
However, I'm having some problems with the annotation of the dataset you made.
I noticed that the format of visible_bbox in "uoais_train_tabletop.json file" seems to be "[x_min, y_min, x_max, y_max]", like "[346, 225, 393, 253]". But in ". /sample_data/annotation_final.json" file the format of the bbox is "[x_min, y_min, width, height]", e.g. "[355, 153, 131, 84]".

But when I try to change the format of visible_bbox in "uoais_train_tabletop.json" to "[x_min, y_min, width, height]" for evaluation, the accuracy is very low.
So, I would like to enquire if my understanding of the above annotation is correct?

@ngzhili
Copy link
Owner

ngzhili commented Jul 30, 2024

Hi @ChuanxinSong, all annotations for visible_bbox in uoais_train_tabletop.json and . /sample_data/annotation_final.json are in [x_min, y_min, width, height] format.
This explains the poor evaluation performance when you did an extra conversion of the visible_bbox annotations that were already in [x_min, y_min, width, height] format.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants