Replies: 2 comments
-
I'm calling it by hand but it annoys me as well, managed to track it down to here in the source Considering @MrHinsh any insight? I couldn't really tell from the commit and PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@ALTrijssenaar has just added a PR #1439 that changes the default behaviour to support this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We're calling the tool automatically and in case of a failure (e.g. exit code -1) we like to start another process. Unfortunately the execution is always returning -1. Any ideas how we could catch a runtime failure? Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions