Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DFT] Add descriptor move constructor and assignment #346

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 21, 2023

Conversation

hjabird
Copy link
Contributor

@hjabird hjabird commented Jul 10, 2023

Description

This PR is paired with suggested changes to the oneMKL specification here for adding move to the dft::descriptor class.

  • Adds dft::descriptor move constructor
  • Adds dft::descriptor move assignment
  • Adds basic tests for both
  • Notes that copy is not implemented

Checklist

All Submissions

* Adds dft::descriptor move constructor
* Adds dft::descriptor move assignment
* Adds basic tests for both
* Notes that copy is not implemented
Copy link
Contributor

@anantsrivastava30 anantsrivastava30 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Co-authored-by: Romain Biessy <romain.biessy@codeplay.com>
@Rbiessy Rbiessy merged commit 79a312c into oneapi-src:develop Jul 21, 2023
@Rbiessy Rbiessy deleted the add_dft_desc_move branch July 21, 2023 16:21
normallytangent pushed a commit to normallytangent/oneMKL that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
* [DFT] Add descriptor move constructor and assignment

* Adds dft::descriptor move constructor
* Adds dft::descriptor move assignment
* Adds basic tests for both
* Notes that copy is not implemented

* Correct comment spelling error.

Co-authored-by: Romain Biessy <romain.biessy@codeplay.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Romain Biessy <romain.biessy@codeplay.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants