Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tags, Custom Properties and other improvements for Data Products #17046

Open
OrtegaJuanJose opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
backend enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@OrtegaJuanJose
Copy link

OrtegaJuanJose commented Jul 16, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

  • Missing the possibility to add Tags to Data Products limits my capacity to query and filter them based on Tags.
  • Missing the possibility to add Custom Properties to Data Products forces me to add them in the Data Product description, which makes repetitive attributes searchable and is not ideal.
  • Missing the capacity to define the FQN on a Data Product or that it has Domain as part of it, forces Data Products names to be unique. In my Data Mesh the uniqueness of Data Products is Domain + Data Product.

Describe the solution you'd like
That Tags and Custom Properties behave just like with other entities.
That Data Products FQN consider the domain, like: "{domain_name}.{data_product_name}"

Describe alternatives you've considered
None

Additional context
Every Data Mesh setup vary greatly, hence Data Products and Domains entities need to be more flexible. This are features needed to comply with part of my organisation's Data Mesh schema.

For example, in my case, Data Products are cataloged by Tier also, so right now I can only include this as text in the description and not use the Tags.

Other open issues for Data Products

@OrtegaJuanJose OrtegaJuanJose added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 16, 2024
@pmbrull
Copy link
Collaborator

pmbrull commented Jul 17, 2024

hi @OrtegaJuanJose, we can move forward with tagging and Custom Properties, but I don't think updating the FQN is viable.

Thanks

@OrtegaJuanJose
Copy link
Author

Ok! Those two improvements will be very helpful nevertheless.
Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants