-
Runc supports opening the sub-path of cgroup through openat2 in a certain version. The logic is as follows:
Does it mean that if the system without supporting openat2 will not be attacked? We have a large number of nodes with runc 1.1.4. I want to confirm whether it needs to be upgraded. Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I think no, there were two fd leaks, the other one is here: 506552a If you are concerned about the compatibility, you can use a minimum patch in 1.1.4 like this PR: lifubang#63 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There were several other internal fd leaks we fixed, as well as adding hardening that will ensure future fd leaks won't cause issues in the future. In addition, runc 1.1.4 is also vulnerable to three different CVEs that we fixed in 1.1.5 (CVE-2023-25809, CVE-2023-27561, CVE-2023-28642). I would strongly suggest that you always upgrade to the latest version of runc as soon as possible, because we do not provide support for older versions. Closing, since I believe your question has been answered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
There were several other internal fd leaks we fixed, as well as adding hardening that will ensure future fd leaks won't cause issues in the future. In addition, runc 1.1.4 is also vulnerable to three different CVEs that we fixed in 1.1.5 (CVE-2023-25809, CVE-2023-27561, CVE-2023-28642). I would strongly suggest that you always upgrade to the latest version of runc as soon as possible, because we do not provide support for older versions.
Closing, since I believe your question has been answered.