You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One problem we find with the meshing tool is that meshing parameters are difficult to define to work for all objects in a complicated model.
It would be beneficial if we could allow a default set, which could be overridden for selected volumes.
For the gmsh-backend an approach could be to use the notion of "physical-partitions" which could then be meshed separately. Obviously it is necessary to have the same parameter set for shared/imprinted surfaces.
For the cq/mmg-backend it would be similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One problem we find with the meshing tool is that meshing parameters are difficult to define to work for all objects in a complicated model.
It would be beneficial if we could allow a default set, which could be overridden for selected volumes.
For the gmsh-backend an approach could be to use the notion of "physical-partitions" which could then be meshed separately. Obviously it is necessary to have the same parameter set for shared/imprinted surfaces.
For the cq/mmg-backend it would be similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: