-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
NAS-NS-3063.txt
3225 lines (2193 loc) · 91 KB
/
NAS-NS-3063.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
m @Sammm jon posss-
ple oOf mm@"mamn contained in
DOE’s Research and Development
~eports to business, industry, the
academic community, and federal,
state and locat governments.
Although a small portion of this
repor: is not reproducible, it is
being made available to expedite
t
the aval lability of m?orma'&son on the
regearch discussed n
NUCLESR SUIERCE SERIES
Radinchemistry of the Elements
R\%
TAE RADIOCHEKISIRY OF URANIUH, REPTURIU ARD ?EUTO&IUH - AN UPDATIRG
NAS-NS--3063
DE86 007600
by
. Richard A. Roberts
Hallinckrodt Medical Products R & D
- 8§75 HeDomnell Boulevard
St. Louis, MD 63134
Gregory R. Choppin
Department of Chemistry
Florida State University
Tallahessee, Florids
and
John F. Wiid
_ Nuclear Chemistry Division
Lavrence Livermore Reticnal Lsboratory
Livermore, California
Prepared for Committee on Ruclear snd Radiochemistry
_ Board on Chemical Sciences and Technoleogy
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources
National Academy of Sciences--Rationsl Research Council
Februazry 18856
Published by
TECHRICAL INFORKATION CENTER
OFFICE OF SCIENTIFIC AED TRCHNICAL IRFORHATION
USITED STATES DEPARTMERT OF ENERCY
Fanflufl
"
‘\__
The Committee on Nuclear agnd Radiochemistry is one cf a aumber
of committees workimg under the Board cn Chemfical Sciemces and
Technelogy of the Commizsion on Physicel Sciences, Kathematics,
and Resources of the Hationzl Acadery cf Sciencesz--Kational
Rezearch Council. Its mezbers are drawn from scademic,
industrisl, and government laboratoriecs &and represent the areas
of nuclear chezistry, radiocheeisctry, end nuclear medicine.
The Committee hes concerned itself with theszs areas of
nuclear sciance which involve the chemist, such ag the
collectionm and digtribution of radiochemical procedures,
speciglized techniques and instrumentetion, the pleacse of nuclear
and radiochezmistry in college 2nd unmiversity programs, the
training of nuclear and radiochemists, radiochemistry in
environzmentel science, and redionuclideszs in nuclear medicine. A
major interest of the Committee is the publicaticn of the
#uclear Science Series of moncgraphe on Radicchemistry znd on
Radiocherical Technigues. In 1982 & third ssries on Ruclear
Hedicine ves inftiasted. :
The Committee hes endeavored tc present monographs that wiil
be o0f maxieum use to the working scientisgt. Each monograph
presents pertinent information required for razdiochemical work
vith an Individual element or with a2 specielized technique or
with the use of radionuclides in nuclear gedicire.
Experts on the varicus subjectsz haee been recruited to write
the monographs. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsors the
printing of the series.
The present monograph is & comprehensive revision and update
of three previously published monographs in the series on the
Radiochemistry of the Elements, It is published 23 part of our
continuing effort to update, revise, snd expand the previously
- published monographs to keep them current and relevant.
Edvard S. Hacias, Chairmen
Committee on Buclear and Radiochemistry
iid
Preface
This monograph presents some procedures used in the
radiochemical isolation, purification and/or analysis of vranium,
neptunium, and plutonium. The original monographs were:
' The Radiochemistry of Uranium, J. E. Gindler, NAS-PS-3050
{1%862), 350 pp.., 18 procedures.
The Radiochemistry of Neptunium, G. A. Burney and |
R. M. Barbour, NAS-NS-3060 (1974}, 229 pp.., 25 prpcedures.
The Radiochemistry of Flutonium, G. B. Coleman, NAS-NS-3058 .
(1965), 184 pp., 25 procedures. |
in addition to the description cf the procedures, these
earlier monographs list the isotopes and their nuclear properties
for each element. They also discuss the chemistry of the
separation processes of these elements with primary emphasis an
precipitation, ion exchange and solvent extraction technigues. 1In
this update of the procedures, we have nct attempted to discuss
the developmentes in the chemistry of U, Np and Pu but have
restricted the monograph tc the newer procedures, most of which
have resulted from the increased emphasis in environmental concern
vhich requires analysis of extremely small amounts of the actinide
element in quite complex matrices. The final section of this
monograph describes several schemes for isolation of actinides by
oxidation state.
" The individual procedures fram the earlier monographs are
ligted by title to provide a more complete view of available
separation techniques. The new procedures in this monograph are
included for each element following the list from the earlier
publications. L
R. A. Roberts
G. R. Choppin
J. F. Wilad
iv
Discussion of Procedures........ ... ........ccvcununn. e, 6
Procedures: |
1. Seri-Quantitative Determination of Uranium
( OSPeCEToSCOPY ) . -t ittt ittt it tecn e ennredannrannnnasannnsa 14
2. Concentration of Uranium by Coprecipitation
with Iron-Potassiuz Ferrocyanophosphonates..... ........... 16
3. Extraction of Uranium with TOA and Spectro;
photometric Determinatiorn with Arsenezo III............... 17
4. Determination of Uranium (and Plutonium)
Isotopes ir Soil Samplies by a-Spectroscopy................1l9
S. Anion Exchange Separstion of U in HMalenic
and Ascorbic Acld Hedla........... .. ...t ienennnn. 21
6. Sepsration of Uranium from Heavy Mecals by
Chromatograephy Using an Arsonic Acid Resin....... Ceeeean 23
7 Chromatographic Separation and C-Spectrometric
Determination of Uranduwa...................... ........... 26
8. Determinetion of Uranium in Natural ¥Waters
After Anion-Exchange Separation............ ............... 26
9. Uranium Analysis by Liquid Scintillation Counting......... 28
'10. Determination of Tracs Uranfum in Biologlcal
Matarials by FKeutron Activation Analysis and
Solvant Extraction...... ... ittt ittt iieanasinaea ..-31
11. Determinztior of Trace Ursniu=z by Instrumental
Reutron Activetior Anslysie........... .ot 33
.
VI.
ViI.
BEow Neptunium Procedyres. ... . ... oo iiiinremctrennncnnanaanaas 34
Introduction..,........... thremasraaaae e raraaeaer e 34
- Procedures: :
1. Chfonatographié Separation of Neptunium Using
Quaternary Ammonium Nitrate Extractant.................... 35
2. A Spectrophotometric Method for the Defernlnation
of Neptunium in Process Solut;ons ......................... 36
Eg!_zlg;gniyn_z;gggflu;gg ....................................... 38
Introdu;tion;........1............;....31 ........... AU 28
Discussion-pf the Procedures....... :.....:?.T .................. 38
Procedures:
1. Ligquid-Liquid Extraction Separatioh and
Detereination of Plutonium......... ... ...ttt nannnnn 40
2, Deterzination of Plutonium in Sediments by
Solvent Extraction............. D 42
3. Radiochemical Determination of Pluteonium in
4. The Determination of Plutonium in Environmental -
Samples by Extraction with Tricdodecylamine................ 46
5. Solvent Extraction Method for Determination
of Plutonium In Soft Tissue............ ...t encennn. 48
6. Determination of Plutonium in Tissue by
8. Extrective Photometric Determination of
Plutonium(IV) with Aliquat-336 and Xylenol Orange......... 54
3. Sizulteneous Determinations of Plutonium Alpha- and
Bata-Activity in Liquid Efflucnts and Enviromnmental
Samples......... e tasasiiessasssssascecesatecsnsnsanesaanns 55
15.
16.
17.
ib'
Roberzs/Choppin/®ild
page 1
- 1. Summary of Previous Urenium Procedures
. J. E. Gindler _
NAS-NS-3050 (1%62)
_Determination'of Uranium -237-
Purification of Uranium -2490
Purification of Irradiated Uranium -236
Uranium and Plutonium Analysis |
Spectrophotoretric Extraction Methods\Specifxc for Uranium
Determinaticon of Uranium in Uranium Concengrates
Carrier Free Determination of Uranium —237
Radioassay of Uranium and Plutonium in Vegetation, Soil, and
Viater
Separation of Uranium by Sclvent Extraction with TOPO
Radiochemical Cetermination of Urénium'—237
Séparation éf Urahium and Bismuth
Isolation.and'Meésuremenfi'of Uranium at the Hicrogr&m Level
The Determination ¢of Uranium by Solvent Extraction
Uranium Radiochemical Procedure ngsed at the U.S. Raciation
- Laboratory at Livermore
Use of Ion Exchange Resins for the Determination of Uranium
in Ores and Solutions
The Use of a Compound Column of Alumina and Celluloée for the
~ Determination of Uranium in Minerals and Ore< Containing
Arsenic and Molybdenum
Determination of Uranium -235 in Mixtures of Naturally
Occurring Uranium Isotopes by Radiocactivation
Determination of Microgram and Submicrogram Quantities of
Uranium by Neutron Activation Analysis
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1s.
16.
17.
18.
Roberts/Choppia/iild
page 2
11. s&mnatl_gf Previous Neptunium Procedures
G. A. Burney and R, M. Harbour
NAS-NS-3060 (1974)
Separation of Np by TTA Extraction
Separation of Np by TTA Extraction
Determination of 23Np in Samples Containing U, Pu, and
Fission Products . '
e
Betermina;ion of Np "
Determination of Small Amounts of Np in fu Metal
Determination of Np in Samples Containing Fission Products,
J, and Other Actinides !
;etermination of Np in Samples of U and Fission Products
2xtraction Chromatographic Separation of 2°np from Fissicn
snd Activation Products in the Determination of Micro- and
Sub-Microgram Quantltzes of U
Separation of U, Np, Pu, and Am by Reversed Phase Partition
Chromatography
An Analytical Method for 237Np Using Anion Bxchange
Separation of U, Np, and Pu Using Anion Exchange
Separation pf Zr, Np, and Nb Using Anion Bxchangé
Separation of Np and Pu by Anion Exchange
Separation of Np and Pu bj Cation Exchange
Separation and Radiochzmical Determination of U and
Transuraniua Elements Using Barium Sulfate
The Low-Level Radiochemical Determinations of z”Np 1n
Envirommental Samples : .
Radiochenical Procedure for the Separation of Trace Amounts
2€ 237Np from Reactor Effluent Water
Determination of Np in Urine
18.
20..
21.
Roberts/ Choppinl!!i 12
page 3
Sunazary of Previous Neptunium Procedures, continued
Determination of 237Np by Gamma Ray Spectrometry
,Spectrophotémetric Determinafion of Nfi
Microvolumetric Complexometric Method for Np with EDTA
Photometric Determination of Np as‘the Peroxide Complex
Separation of Np for Spectrographic @nalysis of Impurities
Photometric Detgrmination of Np as tflg‘xglenol Orange Complex
Analysis for Np by Controlled Potential Coulometry
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9a.
Sb.
- 10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
18.
Roberts /Choppin/Wild
page 4
III. Sunnéry nf Previous Plutenium Procedures
G. H. Coleman '
NAS-NS-3058 (1965)
Determination of Pu in Solutions Containing Large Amounts of
Fe and Cr
Separation and Determination of Pu by TTA Extraction
Separation and Determination of Pu rn\U Fission Product
Mixtures
Plutonium
Pluteonium
Separation of Plutonium from Uranium and Fission Products in
Irradiated Reactor Targets
Determination of Pu
Uranium and Plutonium Analysxs
Separation of Plutonium fram Irradiated Uranium
Separation of Plutonium from Uranium Metal
Purification of Plutonium from Uranium and Fission Products
Uranium and Plutonium £f£rom Envzronmental Samples of Soil,
Vegetation, and Water
Plutonium from Environmental Water Samples
Plutonium from Environmental Water Samples
Separation of Plutonium in Uranium-Plutonium Fission Element
Alloys by TBP Extraction from Chloride Solutions
Separation of Pu before Spectrographic Analysxs of Impurities
Anion Exchange Method .
Separation of Plutonium Before Spectrographic Anlaysis of
Impurities. Extraction Chromatcgraphy Method Using TBP
Separation of Np and Pu bj Anion Exchange
Separation of Rp and Pu by Caticn Exchange Chromatography
Dgtermination of Plutonium in Urine
20.
21.
22.
. 23.
24.
25.
" Procedure)
Roberts/Choppin/Wild
page 5
Suzzary of Previous Plutonium Procedures, continued
Determination of Pu?3?® in Urine (Small Area Electrodeposition
Determination of Plutcnium in Urine
Determination of Americium in Urine 1fi~the Presence of
Plutonium
Determination of Plutonium in Urine by Anion Exchange
Determination of Plutionium in Urine by Cocrystallxzatlon
with Pota531um Rhodizenate
Determinatiocn of Plutonium in Urine and Bone Ash by
Extraction with Primary Amines
Roberts/Choppin/Wild
page 6
IV. New liranium Pracedures
INTRODUCTION
Since the publlcatlon of the orzgxnal monograph on the radio-
chemistry of uranium in 1962, much attention has been given to methods
of separation, isolation, and measurement of small amounts of
uranium in various types of samples. Such samples involve geological,
biological, and environmental matrices, frequently of high complexity
and lcw uranium content. The procedures for such samples collected
in this monograph are meant not to supplant, but rather to supple-
ment those in the original mcnograph by allowing applicability of
the procedures to & wider variety of sample types.
These new procedures were chosen to provide description of
a wide variety of techniques rather -than to fccus on any particular
method, such as neutron activation anaiysis or solvent extraction.
Some of the procedures emphasize the separatzon of uranium from
other elements, while for others, the main focus is the method of
measurement.
A complete procedure generally can be divided into three
operations: 1) ‘sample preparation, 2) separation of the element(s)
of interest, and 3) analytical measurement. In many cases a
specific operation from one procedure can be used in conjunction
with other operations from anothe~ procedure. This should
allow a broad spectrum of sample types. For each of the collected
procedures, sample types to which the procedure may be applied
are given. A more complete discussion of each procedure and
additional informaticn regarding applications can be obtained
from the original reference. In some cases, additional references -
are listed, as they ~ontain similar, related procedures and might
be of interest in the case of some particular sa=mple.
DISCUSSION OF THE PROCEDURES -
The first twc procedures involve precipitation of uranium
from large quantities of water. In the first procedure, NaOH
is used to precipitate uranium from seawater. The efficiency
of recovery of uranium and other heavy radionuclides from 750
grams of seawater by this procedure is shown in Figure 1.
The dspendency of the recovéry efficiency on the volume of NaOH
added is evident, with maximum recovery occurring after addition
to tha 750 gram sample of at least 8 ml of 1.0 M NaOH, which |
corresponds to a final NeOH concentration of approximately 0.01 M.
For different volumes of samples, the amount of base to be added
should be modified so as to obtain a comparable NaOH concentration.
Figure 2 is an alpha spectrum of a uranium sample obtained from
the use of thigs method.
% RECOVERY
- | Roberts/Choppin/Wild
page 7
\ -
_ = \
L | | -
SO /
f e
i o Y
9 Po
i 22®am
- A?"Pu
. g . . 1 -~
° S
mi of L.OM NoOH
FIGURE I. Recovery of uranium (and other added
nuclides) from 750 ml of sea water with - ‘“cus
volumes of 1.0 H.NaDH added. (5ee Proci. -: ™ §
for reference),.
200 —80
é [
P 1
3 /o
T / !
- i 234 —55 >
at 238 u —_—) @
Z ,[ Y //i by
< 1
< ! : / I
X i F / j Q
P : e - Gad
& 100 L/ L2
- h s
CL :- B . f. .E -
v Y I
= i ' } Q.
s o3
. : - <
S | / *{‘5’
/ |
; 235 | 1
‘ 0‘ . . LL | o 1 ‘i a0
CHANNEL NUMBER
FIGURE 2. Alpha activities of natural
uranium plated directly onto & counting
disc from the dissolved precipitate of 740
grems of Scripps Pier sea water. (Note
the absence of other ectivities in the
4.0 - 5.7 MeV energy range). (See -
Procedure 1 for reference).
Roberts/Choppin/Wild
page 8
Roberte/Choppin/tiild
page S
The second procedure involves the coprecipitation of
uranium with iron potessium ferrocyanophosphonates. - This procedure
can be used with larger volumes (several liters) of water and gives
-a slightly better recovery in scme cases. ' '
Procedures 3 ang 4 involve sclvent extraction to preconcen-
trate and isolate the uranium. Procedure 3 uses tri-n-octylamine
(TOA) as extractant; details on the chemistry of this extractant is
described in the original uranium monograph (NAS-NS-3050). This
procedure employs spectrophotometric analysis-.of the urenium by
<he use of arsenazo III reagent, which has come” into wide use
since the publication of the first amonozgraph and is an excellent
reagent for the spectrophotometric determination of uranium.
I+ forms & brightly colored complasx with uranium (VI) and can be
used to detect uranium in the part-per-million range (and, in socme
cases, in even lower concentrations). The original series of
articles on the use of this reagent!”? should be read for details.
Procedure L also uses trioctylamine in the solvent extraction
~ of uranium from acidic agqueous media. This procedure employs
‘the use of 239U tracer to correct for the low (2 - 10%) uranium
yield. This isotope is convenient to use as a tracer since its
alpha decay energies (and these of its daughters) are above
. 5.8 MeV and therefore do not interfexre in alpha spectroscopy with
the peaks cf the more commonly encountered uranium isotopes.
The preparation of the 2%y tracer by irradiation of thorium is
also described in the procedure®. The alpha spectrum of the puri-
fied 3%y (and its daughters) is shown in Figure 3, in which the
separation frcm the alpha spectra of 3%y, 3%y, and 2'% ig
easily seen. Quantitative analysis of samples is obtained by .
alpha spectroscopy and an appropriate yield correction obtained
from the #?°U. Although the yield is low, this procecdure is
a useful one for soil whose complexity causes the low yield.
_ Procedures 5, 6, 7 and 8 involve ion exchange chromato-
graphy. Procedure S used Dowex-21K resin in either the malonic or
ascorbic acid form for the separation c¢f uranium from other metal
ions. This procedure is capablie of separating uranium from a
host of other metals, and is therefore useful for purifying uran-
ium from highly contaminated samples such as fission products.
Uranium forms ‘a stronger anionic complex with both maiosnate and
ascorbate than most other metals and is retained on the column
while other metals are preferentizally eluted with a series of
increasingly stronger eluting agents. Reported recovery is
excellent, S9% + 1%. Additionally, the procedure allows purifi-
cation of thorium, if it is present in the sample.
. Procedure 6 uses Amberlite XAD-4 resin, convertad to the arsoaic
acid form, to separate uranium from natural waters in samples of
up to one liter in volume. Uranium recovery is dependent on pH,
as shown in Figure 4. Recovery and separations from other ametal
ions is reported to be very good, with chromium(III) deing the
only interference. When present in equal concentration with
the uranium (0.5 ppm), approximately l1l1% of the chromium was
eluted with the uranium fraction.
Roberes; Choppin/Wild
pege 10
80
735
a2
4é622)
Ra(5.86)
w t1BRN( 7.14) |
o L,
~22%7018.34 6.
D —7.0
1 ~ o J
| : g ]
e s « .
By < < = :
g., o = o -85 =
1 o = ) % - @
= < - ~ '
g2 I « Sl . ] =
i 2 3 T =
el e T 1 —60 o
® [ 1 @
o id i€
1 W
& ] >
s 9 _}5'5 g
i 60
31 P2
¢ ! j g
{
—gs.o
E
: A 5 o
ik | e
JUWUUL
i / , ' }
¢ .
Channe! Number
FIGURE 3. Alpha spectrum of purified 230y
in equiliggfim vith fits doughcers prepared
from the TR irradiation | rocess, showing
the energy separstion from other common
urapive isotopes. (Emergies given in MeV).
(Sze Procedure & for reference).
% RECOVERY
Roberte/Lhoppin/Wild
page i1
T T | )
80— ) &
0 /
50— / & A —
/° / o Th*¢
40 bwo : fij‘b a Fe+3 —
- 2
| ~ 8 LK%:
| &
201 o0 | - —
| 1 g L L L i ] I i
-3 -2 - O i e 3 4 5 &
o b
FIGURE &. Effect of pH of retenticmn of Th{Iv),
U{VI), and FE(IIL) on &n arsomic ascid columm.
(See Procedure & for zeference).
Roberta/Choppin/¥Wild
' page L2
In Frocedure 7, an initial column geparation using RDEH?
(di=-2=-athylhexylphosphoric acid) supported on 0.1 - 0.2 mm Teflon
seads is used both to isolate the uraniuz fraction from a sample
and to separate the individual U(VI) &and U(IV) fractions. The
separate f{ractions are purified by passage-through anion-exchange
resin columns prior to alpha spectromeiry. Large amounts of Fe(IIIl)
in & sample are reported to interfere with the separation.
- Bowever, reduction to Fe(Il) with hydrazine hydrochloride eliminates
this interference. '
: Procedure 8 employs a tetrahydrofuran-methy! glycol-HCl
pixture with Dowex-l anion resin to separate ura .am from acidified
natural waters. Quantitative analysis is performed bv optical
spectroscopy with arsenazo III. B
An increasingly important anaiyticel tool for alpha emitters
is employed in Procedure 3 wherein liquid scintillation alpha
counting is used to “etermine uranium in biological samples.
Instructions are give+: for t.~ use of both extractive and dispersive
scintillation cocktails. The cttractive cocktail gives slightly
lower background counts, and wcald probably be the more desirable
method for samples with lower uranium content. o
Procedure 10 is a neutron activation analysis for use with
solid biological materials. After irradiation, the uranium is
isoclated by solvent extracticn using HDEHP. The separated uraniux
is analyzed with a Ge(Li) detector by measurement of the 75 keV
gazmma ray of 2°°U. Reported yiei.ds are in excess of 90%.
Procedure 1l also describes a procedure of activation analysis.
in 196%, a procedure (reference 5} was published which quickly
became a leboratory standard for uranium analysis. Although it is
not really applicable to trace quantities of uranium, ner for
highiy radicactive samples, and has been supplanted by newer pro-
cedures, it is worthy of mention since it is still in common
use in many analytical laboratories. In this procedure, uranium
(¥I) is reduced to uranium(IV) by an excess of iron(II) sulfate
in a phosphoric acid-sulfamic acid solution. The excess iron(II)
is oxidized to iron(III) By nitric acid with a molybdenum(VI)
catalyst. The uranium(iV) is finally titrated with standard
potassium dichromate soluticn using barium diphenylamine sulfonate
as the indicator.
This procedure is applicable to solutions of 0-300 mg of
uraniwe per aliquot, with aliquot size up to about 15 ml. Optimum
uraniuz content is around 200 mg. There are relatively few inter-
ferences as compared with other redox methods, but vanadium,
bromide, iodide, and silver interfere directly with the redox
titrations of the U({IV). Additionally, if more than 100 mg of
of chromium{iII) is present, the indicator end-point <¢olor change
will be masked by the intense color of the chremium solution for
determination of trace levels of uranium in sclid samples by
neutron activation analysis in which no chemical separation is used.
lfihrtaldwpplnlflfld
page 13
REFERENCES
S. B. Savin, Talanta, 8, 673-685 (1961).
S. B. Savin, Talanta, 11, 7-19 (196%).
J. Hashimoto, K. Taniguchi, H. Sugiyama, and T. Sotobayashi,
Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry, 52, 133-142 (1979).
W. Davies and W. Gray, Talanta, 11, 1203-1211 (196%).
Roberts/Choppin/Hild
pege 14
PROCEDURE 1
Semi-Quantitative Determination of Uranium
(e-Spectroscopy?
Source: V. L. Hodge, M. E. Gurney, Analytz,cal Chemistry, 47,
1866-68 (1975).
Sazple Type: Sea Hater
rrocedure:
1. Weigh 750 g of sea water into & 1 liter polyethylene bottle
{whose top h&s been cut_off).
2. Add 8 to 10 ml of 1.0 M KaOH while s*;rrzng rapidly with a
magnetic stir Dbar.
3. Centinue stirring for 1 hour, then allow the m;lky preczpztate
tc settle overnight.
4. Compact the precipitate by centrlfugxng the liter poljethylene
- bottle at 2500 rpm for 15 minutes (Note 1).
S. Pour off supernatant sea water.
6. Dissolve the precipitate with 2 ml of 12 M HC1l and add 3 drops
of 0.04% thymol blue indicator.
7. Pour the solution into a plating cell.
8. Add 1 ml of 12 H HCL and 2 ml of deionized water to the poly
bottle.
Wash the walls of the bottle with this soclution and transfer
~ to the plating cell.
10. Wash the bottle once again with 1.5 ml of deionized water and
transfer to the cell which has a stainless steel sounting
planchet as the anode. '
11. Neutralize the contents of the plating cell with 1.5 ml of
15 K NH OE to a pH of 2-3.
iz. Plate the sample at 0.% anp/cmz current density for 1 hour.
Basfore stopping the electrolysis, add 1 =l of 1S i WH, 08
to the cell. Dissemble the cell and prepare the disc for
counting by washing with water and acetone, then drying.
Count with & silicon surface barrier detecteor (the authors
reported using a 300-4S50 == 2 detector monitored by a pulse
height analyzer; counting times of roughly 1000 minutes)
{Mote 2).
Hote 1l:
Hote 2:
Roheftlehoppinlfiilfl
page 15
.__\ .
The reported precipitation efficiency for uranium
ig 86 ¢ 2% using 8 ml of 1.0 K NaOH to effect
préci~itation. Thies value can be us+d in calcul-
atione for semi-quantitative analysis, or a tracer
could be added (see the original arcicle).
Pu and Am are coprecipitated and ciplated with the
uranius. All three elemsnts are dentified and
measured by the alpha energy specircmetry. -
Roberes/Choppin/tilé
pege 16
PROCEDURE 2
Concentration of Uranium by Coprecipitation
with Iron-Potassiuk Ferrocyanophosphonates
Source: V. P. Kermanov, D. A. Fedoseev, Radzokhlm;ya, 18,
827-29 (1878).
Sample Type: Aquecus
Procedure:
1. To 5 liters of water containing uranium, add the following:
7 ml MIOMPA (monoisooctylethylphosphonic acid)
5 ml toluene
1.5 ml kerosene
100 mg potassium ferrocyanide
1.3 3 ferric ~hloride
2. Miz thoroughly for 15 minutes.
3. Filter the precipitate.
4. Transfer to a weighing bottle or metallic substrate.
Extraction efficiency: 93 ¢ 14%
Roberts/Cheppin/Wild
~. . page 17
PROCEDURE 3
Extraction of Uranina with TOA and Spectrophotometric
‘Determination with Arsenazo III
Source: K. Onishi, K. Sekine, Talanta, 19,473-78 (1972)
Sample Type: Acidic aqueous
Procedure:
Solutions: Thenoyltrzfluoroacetone, 6.5 o - dissolve us g
TTA in %00 ml of xylene.
Tri-n-octylamine - dissclve S g TOA in 100 g