-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-2048.txt
2848 lines (2258 loc) · 100 KB
/
ORNL-2048.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
RESEARCH LIBRARY.
Ak (e
UNCLASSIFIED
ORNL.-2048
L
COPY NO. &7
Controct No. W-7405-eng-25
METALLURGY DIVISION
CORROSION OF MATERIALS IN FUSED HYDROXIDES
G. P. 5mith
DATE ISSUED
oo
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Operated by
UNION CARBIDE MUCLEAR COMPANY
A Division of Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation
Post Office Box P
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
MARTIN MARIETTA FNSRGY SYSTEMS LIBRARIES
uncLassiFiep TIRIREIRINED
3 4yyshL 0350099 5
UNGLASSIFIED
ORNL-2048
Metallurgy and Ceramics
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
1. C. E. Center 46, D. W, Cardwell
2. Biology Library 47. W. D. Manly
3. Health Physics Library 48. E. M. King
4. Metallurgy Library 49. A. L. Miller
“56. Central Research Library 50. D. D. Cowen
7. Reactor Experimental 51. P. M. Reyling
Engineering Library 52, G. C. Williams
8-20. Laboratory Records Department 53. R. A. Charpie
21. L.aboratory Records, ORNL R.C. 54, M, L. Picklesimer
22. A. M, Weinberg 55. G. E. Boyd
23. L. B, Emlet (K-25) 56. J. E. Cunningham
24. J. P. Murray (Y-12) 57. H. L. Yakel
25. J. A, Swartout 58. G, M. Adamson
26. E.H. Taylor 59. M. E. Steidlitz
27. E.D. Shipley 60. C. R. Boston
28. F. C, Vonderl.age 61. J. J. McBride
29, W. C. Jordan 62. G. F. Petersen
30. C.P. Keim 63. J. V. Cathcart
31. J. H, Frye, Jr, 64. W. H, Bridges
32. R. 5. Livingston 65. E. E. Hoffman
33. R. R. Dickison 66. W. H. Cook
34. S. C. Lind 67. W, R. Grimes
35. F. L, Culler 68, F. Kertesz
36. A. H. Sneli 69. F. A. Knox
37. A. Hollaender 70. F. F. Blankenship
38. M. T, Kelley 71-90. G, P, Smith
39. K. Z. Morgan 91. N. J. Grant (consultant)
40. J. A, Lane 92. E. Creutz {(consultant)
41. T. A. Lincoln 93. T. 3, Shevlin {consuitant)
42. A. S, Householder 94. E. E. Stansbury (consultant)
43. C. S. Harrill 95. ORNL - Y-12 Technical Library,
44. C. E. Winters Document Reference Section
45. D, S. Billington
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
96. R. F. Bacher, California Institute of Technology
97. Division of Research and Development, AEC, ORD
98. R. F. Kruk, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
99. Douglas Hill, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
100. L. D. Dyer, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
101. R. A. Lad, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Cleveland
- 102. L. F, Epstein, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
103. E. G. Brush, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
UNCGLASSIFIED "
104.
105,
106.
107.
108.
109.
110-428.
UNCLASSIFIED
D. D. Williams, Naval Research Laboratory
R. R. Miller, Naval Research L.aboratory
E. M, Simons, Battelle Memorial Institute
H. A. Pray, Battelle Memcrial Institute
P. D. Miller, Bottelle Memorial Institute
M. D. Banus, Metal Hydrides, Inc.
Given distribution as shown in TID-4500 under Metallurgy and Ceramics category
DISTRIBUTION PAGE TO BE REMOVED {F REPORT IS GIVEN PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
UNGLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CONTENTS
A S T R A T e e e ettt 1
1o INTRODUCTION Lot ettt ee et ee et ee e em e e s e e s et 1
2. ATOMIC NATURE OF FUSED SODIUM HYDROXIDE oo 2
3. CORROSION OF CERAMICS ot 2
Solubility Relations in Fused Hydroxides oo, 2
Oxide-lon Donor-Acceptor REACHIONS . oot 3
Ceramics with Saturated Cations and Saturated ARIONS .ooveeeoveeoe oo 3
Ceramics with Acceptor Cations and Saturated AnionS ..oooveeoeeeeeeeeee oo, 4
Ceramics with Saturated Cations and Acceptor ANTONS oo eev oo 6
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions oo, 7
Corrosion of Other Kinds of Ceramics oo 7
Secondary Corrosion PRENOMENT ..o iciiieeee ettt en e e 7
SUMIMIGEY ot ettt ettt et et et e e ee e e ee s 2t eaee e e et e emee et e e en e e e e s e e s e e te e ee et ens e e e e et es e eeess oo 8
4. CORROSION OF METALS Lo ettt evae et er e e e s e e et ees e e 8
Corrosion of Metals by Oxidation ...t 8
Corrosion by Hydroxyl Tons oottt ee e 8
Corrosion by Alkali Metal lons ..o, et sttt ner e ane s aben e et eeeane s 11
Corrosion by Oxidizing SolUtes . ..o es oot e oo eee e (A
Corrosion of A0y S oo ettt e et sener et (R
5. MASS TRANSEER .ottt et ee e e ee e e er e e 16
TR | ettt bt e e et s et e e e e e e e et e et s oo es et n e e ee e rans 17
Other Elemental Metals ...ttt est e ee e ee s ers e 20
ALOY S ottt ettt et a et n e ee et e te e e et et e et ee s e e e e 20
Bimetal e B eets oottt 20
Mechanism of Mass Transfer oottt er e e e 21
Differential Solubility (Mechanism 1) ................................................................................... 21
Oxidation-Reduction Processes (Mechanisms V1) ..o 21
Local Cell Action (Mechanism Y o oo e 22
Reduction of Hydroxyl lohs(MechqniSm T e e e e 22
Reduction of Alkali Metal lons (Mechanism 1V) oo, 23
Reduction of Solutes (Mechanism V) e e e e 23
Disproportionation (Mechanism V1), ettt et as 23
Summary of MechaniSms ..ot er e nn. 24
SUMIMIAIY ettt e e asase s he s oaaa s s ase s e e et e ae s e et enesee et s e st e e estetsesaeseseebesseeeteesseses oo 25
REFERENCES ettt e et e ee e ee e s e e sannee s s et esens 27
UNGLASSIFIED
UNGLASSIFIED
CORRi)SION OF MATERIALS IN FUSED HYDROXIDES
G. P. Smith
ABSTRACT
Some of the fused alkali-metsl hydroxides are of potential interest in reactor technology both
as coolants and as moderators. The property. which most discourages the use of these substances
is their corrosiveness,
The corrosion of ceramics and ceramic-reloted substances by fused hydroxides occurs both
by solution and by chemical reaction.
A few ceramics rea¢t with hydroxides by oxidation-
reduction reactions, but most have been found to be attacked by oxide-ion donor-acceptor re-
actions,
Magnesium oxide was the most corrosion-resistant of the ceramics which have been
tested, although several other ceramics are sufficiently resistont to be useful.
The corrosion of metc}ls and alleys by fused hydroxides takes place primarily by oxidation of
the metal, accompanied by reduction of hydroxyl ions to form hydrogen and oxide iens. Three side
reactions are known, but two of them are not important in most corrosion tests. The corrosion
of alloys involves either the formation of subsurface veoids within the alloy or the formation of
complex, twa-phase corrosion products at the surface of the alioy. Nickel is the most corrosion-
resistant metal which has been studied in fused sodium hydroxide.
Mass transfer, inducéd by temperature differenticls, has been found to be the primary factor
limiting the use of metals which, under suitable conditions, do not corrode seriously.
I. INTRODUCTION
Some of the fused alkali-metal hydroxides are of
potential interest in reactor technology as moder-
ators, moderator-coolants, and, possibly, moderator-
fuel vehicles.! The heat-transfer properties of
these substances are sufficiently good for them
to have been recommended as heat-
transfer media.? For use as a high-temperature
moderator without a cooling function, sodium hy-
droxide possesses the virtues of being cheap and
available as contrasted with its competitors, either
liquid or solid. Furthermore, an essential sim-
plicity in reactor design is achieved by combining
in one material the two functions of slowing
neutrons and cooling.? '
industrial
There are only a few
substances which will do both at high tempera-
tures,
Of the high-temperature moderator-coolants, the
fused alkali-metal hydroxides are among the most
stable with respect to both thermal dissociotion
and radiation domage. |t has been known for
some time that the alkali metal hydroxides should
be stable toward thermal dissociation. However,
not until recently have techniques been developed
whereby this dissociation could be guantitatively
Steidlitz and Smith? have shown that
this dissociation is relatively small, For example,
at 750°C the partial pressure of water in equi-
librium with fused sodium hydroxide is of the order
of magnitude of 0.1 mm Hg.
The radiation stability of fused hydroxides' has
been reported by Hochanadel® with regard to
electron bombardment and by Keilholtz et ul. ® with
regard to neutron bombardment. The radigtion
levels reported were very substantial, and ne
evidence was found for radiation damage.
measured.
The property of fused alkali-metal hydroxides
which most discourages their application at high
temperatures is their corrosiveness. It is the
purpose of this discussion to review the current
scientific status of studies of corrosion by fused
hydroxides. , fi
During the past five years, knowledge of the
cotrosive properties of fused hydroxides at high
temperatures has increased considerably. Never-
theless, this is a new field of research and one
in which there has been found a remarkable variety
of corrosion phenomena, so that the areas of
ignorance are more impressive than the areas
of knowledge. For this reason, the writer has
UNCLASSIFIED _ 1
chosen to ploce emphasis on some of the problems
which are most in need of solution., This review
will, accordingly, be concermned with the kinds of
corrosion phenomena which have been observed
rather than with the compilation of engineering
reference data, Moreover, with a view toward
stimulating further research, the writer has taken
the liberty of presenting a number of quite specu-
lative ideas on the origins of some of the corrosion
phenomena, Only in this way con many importani
possible accomplishments of further research be
indicated.
In this report, the term ‘‘fused hydroxides’ is
taken to mean the fused alkali-metal hydroxides;
the exception is lithium hydroxide, which, like
the fused hydroxides of the alkaline-garth metals,
is less stable with regard to thermal dissociotion
than the other alkali metal hydroxides. Most of
the available corrosion data are for fused sodium
hydroxide. Information on corrosion in fused po-
tassium hydroxide indicates that this substance
behaves qualitatively like sodium hydroxide. There
are very little dofo available on the hydroxides
of rubidium and cesium.
2. ATOMIC NATURE OF FUSED 50DiUM
HYDROXIDE
Studies of electrical conductivity? and of the
freezing-point depression by electrolyte solutes®
indicate that fused sodium hydroxide is o typical
fused electrolyte which obeys, at lzast approxi-
mately, the model of ideal behavior proposed for
such substances by Temkin.? Thus, sodium hy-
droxide consists of soedium ions and hydroxyl ions
held together by coulombic attraction such that
no cotion may be considered bound to a particular
anion, although, on the avercge, each cation has
only anion neighbors and vice versa. When an
ionic sodium compound is dissolved in fused
sodium hydroxide, the cations of the solute become
indistinguishable from those of the solvent. The
hydroxyl anion is not a simple particle of unit
negative chorge but has a dipole siructure and,
under suitable conditions, u polypole structure.10
3. CORROSION OF CERAMICS
Studies which have been made of the behavior
of ceramic materials in fused hydroxides are
limited in scope both as regords the variety of
substances tested and the information obtained on
any one substance. The use of petrography and
x-ray diffraction, which have been largely ignored
in the past, together with o proper regard for the
reactivity of many corrosion products in contact
with moisfure and carbon dioxide, is essential for
further progress.
The corrosion of ceramics and of ceramic-ralated
substances by fused hydroxides has been observed
to take place by solution and by chemical reaction,
A few of the chemical reactions which have been
observed were found to be oxidation-reduction re-
actions, These will be described briefly near the
end of this section. The majority of the known
reactions of ceramics and ceramic-related sub-
stances with fused hydroxides have been found
to be oxide-ion donor-acceptor reactions. This
kind of reaction in fused hydroxides may be treated
in a quantitative although formal way by appli-
cation of acid-base analog theory. Such a ireat-
ment is beyond the scope of this report. However,
some of the concepts derived from the theory of
oxide-ion donor-acceptor reactions are very useful
in describing the reactions between ceramics and
hydroxides and will be considered.
Solubility Relations in Fused Hydroxides, — A
ceramic material which is chemically inert toward
fused hydroxides might be limited in usefulness
because of appreciable solubility in these media.
There have besn very few quantitative measure-
ments of solubility relations in fused hydroxides,
and none of these measurements have been made
for substances which are of importance as ceramics,
However, in a discussion of the corrosion of
ceramics, such solubility relations must inevitably
be menticned if only in a qualitative way.
There is a fundamental difference between solu-
bility relations in nonelectrolytes such as water
ond in fused electrolytes such as hydroxides.
Solutions of a simple ionic substance in water may
be described in terms of a binary system, while
such solutions in fused hydroxides are reciprocal
salt systems which require the specification of
four components provided that the solute does not
have an ion in common with the solvent, Under
special conditions reciprocal salt systems may
be treated as quasi-binary systems, but it is
unwise to assume such behavior in the absence
of confirmatory experimental evidence.
Metathesis reactions in aqueous media are, of
course, the manifestation of reciprocal salt solu-
The corresponding type of re-
action in a fused hydroxide solution is complicated
by the fact that six composition variables would
in general be needed to describe the possible
solid phases which could precipitate from solution.
bility relations,
Oxide-lon Donor-Acceptor Reactions. — Many
chemical substances have a significant affinity for
oxide ions. Two well-known examples are carbon
dioxide and water, which react with oxide ions to
form, respectively, carbonate ions and hydroxyl
ions. Such substances are referrad to as “‘oxide-
ion acceptors.” Once an acceptor has reacted
with an oxide ion, it becomes a potential oxide-ion
donor and will give up its oxide ion to a stronger
acceptor. Thus, the hydroxy! ion is an oxide-ion
donor which is conjugate fo, or derived from, the
oxide-ion acceptor, water. Carbon dioxide is «
stronger acceptor than water and hence will react
with hydroxyl ions to form carbonate ions and
water, Such a reaction may be viewed as a compe-
tition for oxide ions between the two acceptors,
carbon dioxide and water:
(3.1) CO, + 20H-
it
Co,~~ + H,0
acceptor | + donor Il = donor | + acceptor [}
The reaction goes in that direction which produces
the weaokest donor-acceptor pair, '
Many substances will behave toward hydroxyl
ions like carbon dioxide in Eq. 3.1; that is, they
will capture oxide ions and liberate water. This
is not necessarily because the acceptor in question
is intrinsically stronger than water. An acceptor
which is stronger than water must successfully
compete with water for oxide ions when water and
the acceptor in question are at the same concen-
tration. Frequently reactions like Eg. 3.1 take
place because water is easily volatilized from
fused hydroxides at high temperatures, and conse-
quently its concentration is very low compared
with the concentration of the competing oxide-ion
acceptor. However, the water concentration in a
fused hydroxide may be maintained constant by
fixing the partial pressure of water over the melt,
Under this condition o comparison may be made
of the relative abilities of two oxide-ion acceptors
to capture oxide ions from hydroxyl ions in the
presence of the same fixed concentration of water.
Thus it is meaningful to speck of the relative
oxide-ion acceptor sirengths of two substances in
fused hydroxide solutions.
As was pointed out in the preceding section,
when an ionic substance is dissolved in a fused
hydroxide, dissociation, in the sense of separation
of ions, occurs, and the cations and anions of the
dissolved substance behave as chemically separate
entities, This does not mean that complex ions
may not form. It means that an ionic compound
such as sodium chloride dissolves as sodium ions
and chloride ions rather than as sodium chloride
molecules. This concept of ionization is' the
foundation of most of the modern chemistry of fused
electrolytes. On the basis of this concept it is
postulated that, when an ionizable solute is dis-
solved to form a dilute solution in a fused
hydroxide medium, separate oxide-ion affinities
may be ascribed to the cations and to the anions
of the solute., Although there are definite limi-
tations to the application of this postulate, it is
very useful for two reascns. First, it provides a
satisfactory qualitative description of the known
reactions between solutes and hydroxyl ions in
fused hydroxides. Second, to the extent that this
postulate is true, it allows inferences to be made
about the reactivity of an untested ionic compound
composed of cations C* and anions A~, provided
that the behavior of C* and A~ is known separately
trom the reactions of compounds which have as
cations only C* and other compounds which have
as anions only A—.
Considerations of the origin of the oxide-ion
affinity of cations, such as has been presented
by Dietzel'! and by Flood and Férland,'? indicate
that cations of very low ionic potential should
have low oxide-ion affinities, The cations to be
found in this category are the alkali-metal ond
alkaline-earth These ions have ac-
cordingly been found to show only o weak-to-
negligible tendency to react with hydroxyl ions in
tused hydroxide solution, _
Likewise, certain kinds of anions have such
small oxide-ion affinities that they have been
found to show only a weak-to-negligible tendency
to capture oxide ions from hydroxyl ions in fused
hydroxide solution. The onions in this category
include the oxide ion, the halide ions, and some
oxysalt anions such as carbonate and sulfate.
Obviously, ortho-oxysalt anions belong in this
category inasmuch as they are all saturated with
oxide ions. lons which show little or no tendency
to accept oxide ions from hydroxyl ions in fused
hydroxides will be referred to, for convenience,
os "‘saturated’’ ions. ;
Ceramics with Saturoted Cotions and Soturated
Anions, — lonic compounds with soturated cations
and anions have thus far all proved to be too
soluble for use as solid components in fused
hydroxide media. The alkali metal oxides!3 gnd
halides®:14 have been found to be quite soluble.
cations.
Barium chloride!3 showed significant solubility
in sodium hydroxide ot 350°C. A sample of
calcium oxide fired at 1900°C to give an apparent
porosity of 3% was reported!® to be severely
attacked by fused sodium hydroxide at 538°C,
although other tests!3 indicate that its solubility
is small at 350°C.
Ceramics with Accepter Cotions and Soturated
Anions, — A substantial proportion of the ceramics.
and ceramic-related substances which have been
tested in fused hydroxides is composed of cations
with appreciable oxide-ion acceptor strengths and
anions which are saturated. Cations which accept
oxide ions from hydroxyl ions should do so by the
formation of either oxides or oxysalt anions,
The formation of an oxide by the reaction of an
acceptor cation with a fused hydroxide has been
observed in studies!3 of the reactions of mag-
nesium chloride and nicke! chloride with fused
sodium hydroxide. These compounds reacted very
rapidly at 400°C to form insoluble magnesium oxide
and insoluble nickel oxide. The reaction of mag-
nesium chloride is given by the equation
(3.2) MgClz(solid) + 20H~ (melt)
= MgO(sclid) + 2CI~(melt) + HQO(gos)
Considerakble data are available on the reaction
of oxides with hydroxyl ions. Three oxides, those
of magnesium, zinc, and thorium, have been tested
up to temperatures without giving
evidence of Four oxides, those of
cerium(lV), nickel, zirconium, and aluminum, have
been shown under some conditions to have a sig-
nificant resistance toward reaction with hydroxyl
ions, although they are all known to be capable
of reacting completely. Two oxides, those of
niobium(V) and titanium, have been found to react
relatively rapidly at lower temperatures.
substantial
reaction,
Further
details on the above oxide-hydroxide reactions will
be given below.
The sction of fused sodium hydroxide on mag-
nesium oxide was studied by D'Ans and Loffler!¢
at temperotures up to 800°C, but they were unable
to detect any woter evolution, Steidlitz and
Smith,? who made mass spectrometric determi-
nations of the gases evolved on heating sodium
hydroxide to 800°C in o vessel cut from a mag-
nesium oxide single crystal, found water vapor,
but its presence was accounted for quantitatively
in terms of the thermal dissociation of hydroxyl
ions in the presence of sodium ions. The chemical
stability of magnesium oxide in fused sodium
hydroxide is not surprising, since magnesium is
not known to occur in an oxysalt anion. 7
Magnesium oxide is not only chemically stable
in fused sodium hydroxide but is also quite in-
soluble. In corrosion tests, Steidlitz and Smith4
found that single-crystal specimens of magnesium
oxide in a large excess of anhydrous sodium
hydroxide at 800°C. decreased in thickness by less
than 0.001 in. in 117 hr.
Water in fused sodium hydroxide has been found
to attack magnesium oxide. Boston!® reported that
anhydrous sodium hydroxide has no visible effect
on cleavage planes and polished surfaces of mag-
nesium oxide crystals up to 700°C but thut the
presence of water vapor over the melt caused rapid
etching of the crystal surfaces. This effect of
water is enfirely consistent with the oxide-ion
donor-acceptor concept.
The equilibrium between magnesium oxide and
water in the presence of sodium hydroxide may be
expressed as
(3.3) MgO(s) + H,O(melt)
= 20H"(melt) + Mg++(me|f)
The activity of solid magnesium oxide, MgQ(s), is
a constant, the hydroxy! ions,
OH=(melt), are present in great excess and should
have approximately constant activity. Conse-
quently, the application of the law of mass action
to Eq. 3.3 shows that the activity of magnesium
ions in the melt should be proportional to the
activity of water in the melt; that is, an increase
in the conceniration of water in the melt should
increase the apparznt solubility of magnesium
oxide.
Furthermore,
The practical application of magnesium oxide as
a ceramic material for service in fused anhydrous
hydroxides presents difficulties. Most sintered
compacts of pure magnesium oxide ore sufficiently
porous to absorb appreciable quantities of sodium
hydroxide. l.arge magnesium oxide single crystals
can be machined into fairly complicated shapes
when a special need for a particularly corrosion-
resistant part justifies the expense. At the Ook
Ridge Nationa! Laboratory, reaction vessels have
been machined from massive magnesium oxide
crystals, and in every instance such vessels have
proved to be very satisfactory containers for fused
sodium hydroxide.
Qualitatively, zinc oxide behaves much like
magnesium oxide in the presence of fused sodium
hydroxide. D'Ans and Loffler’® were unable to
find evidence of a reaction between zinc oxide
and anhydrous sodium hydroxide at 600°C. How-
ever, oxysalt anions of zinc are known to exist, 17
and it is possible that a reaction occurs at temper-
atures above 600°C. D’Ans and Léffler report
that water greatly increased the apparent solubility
of zinc oxide in sodium hydroxide. This behavior
may be analogous to that of magnesium oxide, or
it may result from the formation of complex zinc
anions involving water.'? In a corrosion test!?
compressed and sintered zinc oxide was found to
have lost 8% in weight at 538°C.
Chemical studies'® on thorium oxide indicate
that it does not react with fused sodium hydroxide
up to 1000°C. However, no corrosion or solubility
data are available.
As pointed out above, cerium(lV) oxide, nickel
oxide, zirconium oxide, and aluminum oxide are
all known to react completely with sodium hy-
droxide under suitable conditions, However, they
_all have been reported to show considerable re-
sistance toward reaction under other conditions.
D*Ans and L&ffler!® found that cerium(lV) oxide
reacted very slowly with an excess of sodium
hydroxide, the interaction beginning first between
950 and 1000°C, but, surprisingly enough, an
excess of cerium(lV) oxide reacted more easily
at 900°C to give N«JIZCeC)3 and water. '
Nickel oxide was found!3 to be unreactive in
fused sodium hydroxide at 400°C, at least for short
periods of time. Williams and Miller?? did not find
any reaction even at 800°C for a period of 2 hr.
However, Mathews, Nauman, and Kruh2? found that
at B00°C nickel oxide reacted rapidly with sodium
hydroxide to give water and Na,NiQ, according to
the equation
(3.4) NiO(s) + 2NaOH(l)
: = quNioz(s) + Hzo(g)
The difference between the results of these two
groups of experimenters is not understood.
Zirconium oxide was found by D’Ans and Loffler!®
to react with excess sodium hydroxide to form
Na,ZrO,. However, corrosion tests on stabilized
zirconium oxide have shown this substance to be
resistant to attack. Craighead, Smith, Phillips,
and Jaffee'’ found that stabilized zirconium oxide,
fired at 1700°C in either air or argon to give an
apparent density of less than 0.5%, was unaffected
by exposure to fused sodium hydroxide for 25 hr
at 538°C. Stabilized zirconium oxide differs from
the pure substance in having o different crystal
structure at the temperatures of interest here and
in having a few weight per cent of calcium or
magnesium oxide in solid solution. However, it
is difficult to see how these differences could
significantly alter the thermochemistry of the zir-
conium oxide—sodium hydroxide reaction, although
they may have an effect on the rate of reaction.
Aluminum oxide was found by D'Ans and Léffler!®
to react with sodium hydroxide to give the oxysalt
NuzAlzod. Craighead, Smith, Phillips, and Jaffee!?
exposed a single crystal of aluminum oxide to
sodium hydroxide at 538°C and reported that the
crystal decreased in weight by 0.40% after 24 hr.
Simons, Stang, and Logedrost?? used hot-pressed
A|203 as a pump bearing submerged in fused
sodium hydroxide ot 538°C. After 8 hr of pump
operation they were unable to detect any signs of
bearing wear or other damage. Tests have also
been reported!® for hot-pressed and for sintered
aluminum oxide. Weight changes which were
observed were less than those for single-crystal
material under the same conditions. This sur-
prising result may have been caused by abserption
of hydroxide into pores of the hot-pressed sample,
which compensated for a weight loss. :
The relatively good corrosion resistance of
aluminum oxide found in these corrosion tests is
confirmed by day-to-day experience at ORNL.
Vessels made of pure, binder-free, recrystallized
aluminum oxide without poresity have been found
to be excellent containers for fused sodium hy-
droxide under a wide variety of service conditions
where a small aluminate contamination could be
tolerated. It should be remembered, however, that
most commercial alumina and some so-called
““corundum ware’’ have a silica or fluoride binder
which is readily ottacked by fused hydroxides.
Niobium(V) oxide has been found to react very
readily with fused sodium hydroxide. Spitsyn and
Lapitskii?3 heated niobium(V) oxide with fused
sodium hydroxide for 1-hr periods at temperatures
of 350 to 650°C and found the reaction :
(3.5) Nb205 + T0NaCH = QNGSNE)OS + 5!’120
Titanium dioxide reacts readily with fused sodium
hydroxide at 800°C. D’Ans and Loffler'® studied
this reaction and concluded that when an excess of
hydroxide was present the reaction was not quanti-
tative but that an equilibrium existed, probably
between sodium orthotitanaie and a metatitanate.
Such an equilibrium might be as follows:
(3.6) Na,Ti, 0, + 2NaOH = 2Na,TiO; + H,O
In corrosion tests,!? titanium dioxide ceramics
sintered at 760°C were found to be very severely
attacked by sodium hydroxide at 538°C.
Inasmuch os sodium aluminate appears to be
stable in fused sodium hydroxide, it might be
supposed that the aluminate anion is of itself inert.
It has been shown!3 that ceramics with compo-
sitions in the neighborhood of MgAl, O, are quite
corrosion~resistant in fused sodium hydroxide.
This result is not surprising, bacause sodium
aluminate has a low solubility and the magnesium
ion would tend fo react fo give magnesium oxide,
which is very corrosion-resistant,
Ceramics with Soturcted Caticns and Accepter
Anions. — The saturated cations, as pointed out
above, are those of the alkali and alkaline-earth
metals. Only a few tests have been made on
compounds with cations which are saturated and
anions which will accept oxide ions from hydroxyl
ions, and they have been limited to the sodium
oxysalts with high oxide-ion affinities. Obviously,
such substances should not be corresion-resistant.
However, an exomination of their behavior will
serve to illustrate the kinds of reactions which
anions undergo.
The chemical composition of a sodium oxysalt
can alwsys be expressed in terms of the number
of equivalent weights of sodium oxide per equivalent
weight of the other oxide of which the oxysalt is
staichiometrically composed. Feor convenience,
this quantity will be designated as 3.
In general, the greater the 2 value of an oxysalt,
the less will be the oxide-ion affinity of its anion
as compared with other cnions composed of the
same elements. Therefore, if an oxide is found
to react with fused sodium hydroxide to yield at
equilibrium an oxysalt with a value of 2 equal to
o and if there are other oxysalts of the oxide in
question with values of X less than o, it may be
presumed that the other oxysalts will also react
with fused sodium hydroxide. This well-known
postulate, herein called the 'Y postulate,’’ under-
lies all phase-diagram work in which an oxide-ion
donor such as sodium carbonate is used as a
source of oxide ions.
In agreement with this postulate Spitsyn and
Lapitskii?® showed that sodium metaniobate(V),
like niobium(V) oxide, reacts with sodium hy-
droxide to give sodium orthoniobate(VY). This
reaction is as follows:
(3.7) NaNbO, + 4NaOH = NagNbQ, + 2H,0
Some information is available on two nonmetallic
systems of sodium oxysalts, [t has been known
for a long time that silicon dioxide, boron oxide,
the silicates with smoll & values, the borates of
boron{lil) with small 2 values, and the glasses
based on these substances nearly all react readily
with fused hydroxides to form water and the more
alkaline silicates and borates. This reactivity has
been utilized for many years in the solubilization
of minerals by a process known as alkali fusion,
On the other hand, very little information is
available on the action of fused hydroxides on
the more alkaline silicates and borates, many of
which should be relatively unreactive toward fused
hydroxides provided that they contain unreactive
cations.
From a knowledge of the end products of alkali
fusions it would be possible to estimate the
reactivity of the silicates and borates with high
3 values by application of the 3 postulate. Un-
fortunately, there are very few data of this kind.
Usually the products of alkali fusions are not
examined until ofter they have been hydrolyzed.
The results of two experiments are available,
however. First, Morey and MerwinZ4 mention,
without giving experimental conditions, that sodium
pyroborate is stoble in fused sodium hydroxide.
Second, D'Ans and Loffler1® found that silicon
dioxide reacts with an excess of sodium hydroxide
to yield an equilibrium between the pyrosilicate
and the orthosilicate as follows:
(3.8) Na $i,0, + 2NaOH = 2Na,5i0, + H,0
From these dota it is concluded thot borates with
Y less than 2 and silicates with 2 less than 1.5
will react in a similar fashion. This rather terse
conclusion can be interpreted in terms of the
structural chemistry of the borates and the sili-
cates.
Oxygen atoms in simple borates and silicates are
of twe kinds: those which are bound to two boron
or silicon atoms and form so-called ‘‘oxygen
bridges" and those which are bound to only cne
boron or silicon atom and carry o negative chorge.
Thus, the pyroborate ion has one oxygen bridge
and may be structurally represented as
“O\B/O\B/O“
1L
When an oxide ion reacts with a borate or sili-
cate, an oxygen bridge is broken and is replaced
by two nonbridge oxygen atoms. Thus, the pyro-
borate ion shown above can react with one oxide
ion to form two orthoborate ions each with the
following structure:
-0 o-
N
I
The X postulate implies that the greater the number
of oxygen bridges attached to a given boron or
silicon atom, the greater the oxide-ion affinity of
that atem. Since simple borates and silicates with
Y greater than 2 and 1.5, respectively, react with
sodium hydroxide, it is concluded that for these
compounds a boron or silicon atom with more than
one oxygen bridge has sufficient oxide-ion affinity
to accept an oxide ion from a hydroxyl ion. |
There are ‘other alternatives to the structural
interpretation of silicate and borate reactions in
fused hydroxides. For example, equilibrium 3.8
is thermodynamically consistent with the as-
sumption that, rather than the oxygen bridge in
the melt being a physical entity, the pyrosilicate
ions (known to exist in solids) dissociafe into
orthosilicate and SiG_ 2~ ions. Another alternative
is that there is an equilibrium in the melt between
5i,0 6~ on the one hand and :SiOA‘*" and Si03:2“
on the other without either one or the other pre-
dominating. The present technique of studying
fused electrolytes does not make it possible to
determine which reaction takes place, ‘
Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. — Only a few
examples have been found of oxidation-reduction
reactions of ceramics and ceramic-related sub-
stances in fused anhydrous hydroxides. Further-
more, all oxides and oxysalts which contain metals
capable of existing in more than one valence state
in fused hydroxides should undergo oxidation or
reduction reqctions, There are very few studies
of oxidationreduction reactions of oxides or oxy-
salts in fused hydroxides., In the former category
the behavior of silicon and carbon, two elements
which might be considered ceramics, has been
studied. :
As shown by LeBlanc and Wey!,?% silicon reacts
violently when displacing hydrogen from fused
potassium hydroxide at 400°C. The over-all re-
action was not determined, but an obvious guess,
on the basis of the information in the preceding
section, is that the orthosilicote is formed ac-
cording to the equation
(3.9) Si + 4NoOH = Na,Si0, + 2H,
Carbon in the form of massive graphite shows
very fittle tendency tfo react :o‘r temperatures up to
500°C but does absorb some hydroxide because
of its porosity. However, it has been demonstrated
that oxidation of graphite does occur, although net
rapidly, at temperatures as low as 500°C. Ketchen
and Overholser?® made a careful study of: the
action of a large excess of sodium hydroxide on
graphite (possible oxidants other than the hy-
droxide were excluded) and found that, above
500°C, graphite is oxidized to form sodium car-
bonate. At 815°C, graphite has been shown to
react quite rapidly.!3 '
D'Ans and L&ffler'6 report that under an atmos-
phere of nitrogen, iron(lil) oxide reacts with fused
sodium hydroxide to give mostly sodium ferrate(ll1),
with a small amount of an oxysalt in a higher
valence state, which they suggest may have been
sodium ferrate(V1).
Corrosion of Other Kinds of Ceramics. — The
action of sodium hydroxide on a number of other
kinds of ceramics such as carbides has been
studied13 in corrosion tests, However, no experi-
mental information was obtained which would
identify the chemical reactions.
Secondary Corrosion Phenomena. — The three
causes of the deterioration of ceramic bodies,
which will be considered secondary in the sense
that they do not reflect the infrinsic chemical
reactivity of the primary ceramic constituents, are
spalling, binder attack, and pore penetration.