-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-2338.txt
5723 lines (3782 loc) · 131 KB
/
ORNL-2338.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
TR e essenon
3 445k D3505Lc H
ORNL-2338
UC-25 = Metallurgy and Ceramics
INTERIM REPORT ON CORROSION BY
ZIRCONIUM-BASE FLUORIDES
G. M. Adamson
R. S. Crouse
W. D. Manly
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
ORNL-2338
UC-25 = Metallurgy and Ceramics
Contract No. W-7405-eng-26
METALLURGY DIVISION
INTERIM REPORT ON CORROSION BY ZIRCONIUM-BASE FLUORIDES
G. M. Adamson
R. S. Crouse
W. D. Manly
DATE ISSUED
JAN 3 1961
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Qak Ridge, Tennessee
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS LIBRARE
e N
3 445L 0350512 y
FOREWORD
The corrosion data reported herein are an extension of the data given in the com-
panion report Interim Report on Corrosion by Alkali-Metal Fluorides: Work to May 1, 1953
(ORNL-2337) but concemn zirconium fluoride—base mixtures, principally fluoride 30. The
companion report should be used in conjunction with this one for background information,
which will not be repeated here. The period covered by this report is approximately from
July 1952 to June 1956.
CONTENTS
FOr@WOIT ...cccovisiossasssssssssssssssusassnasssiosess sinsunssisssssosnansnnasssissssssbsassss
A DS ACT oottt
ConClUSIonS .oy s R e T S
Expaiimantol Methoths cicms i rimim i i s i P SR I T b v civR isean v bemab SR e s by
Equipment .....ocovoivniieiciiciienan,,
Procedure ....c.cooievnnnne
Results and Discussion......cuiiiamnwmmisnasms
Fluoride 30 in Inconel Loops......ccoivencrvnciinnicierire e
Standard Loops ...... R R
Dperating Time s
Effect of Temperature.........cccoiiieciiiesiesicssisssssssssesessssasesessssnesnns
NEMPOrature LD .. ovovsrres ramismsmssusssmesnsssssasssrmnssanssonsppaseenpassmiss st stass assiss
Additives .
OO0 WL v n N NN
B —
O —
Ratio of Surface Areu 10 Lnop Volume SR R A e BB bR
Oxide Removal Procedures ..............
Heating Methods ..................
Loop Size and Shape......c.cc.c...... e s e T A T e G SRR T TR A
Change in Analysis of inner Prpe Wail
Effect of Uranium Concenfration......c..........
Barren Fluoride Mixtures ..............
Screening Tests of Possible Container Materials..........
Staindess Staals . onininn s iR SR
BB VPO cmes e snansnesmas o msmontns sensos s HTeE e eSS FRS PR B WS S i
Nickel ..
Inconel X T S R S S PR G e A e TR
Mnlybdenum und Ntoblum
Hastallay B . .. ot i i e i Bt
Special Alloys ..............
Special Fuel Mixtures ................
Alkali-Metal-Base Mixtures Containing Trivalent Uranium......
Reactions and Mechanisms .....cccocovivvvevenvnnnnnn.
W LI WK M
O B — 00 =]
L W
~ ~
5588
E&&EED
Ln
O~
INTERIM REPORT ON CORROSION BY ZIRCONIUM-BASE FLUORIDES
G. M. Adamson R. S. Crouse W. D. Manly
ABSTRACT
(rhe zirconium fluoride—base fluoride mixture NaF-ZrF -UF , (50-46-4 mole %), referred to as “‘fluoride 30,"
was circulated in Inconel thermal convection loops for periods varying from 500 to 5000 hr and ot a hot-leg tempera-
ture of 1500°F.
companying the circulation of zirconium fluoride—~base mixtures in Incenel,
The purpose of this program was to develop an understanding of the corrosion mechanism ac-
The attack in the Inconel loops was in the form of subsurface voids formed by selective leaching of chromium |
from the alloy. After 500 hr of operation the voids were found to depths of about 10 mils, with the depth continuing
to increase at a rate of abaut 4 mils per 1000 hr of operation. The effects of such variables as time, hot-leg temper-
ature, temperature drop, fluoride purity, loop size and shape, and inhibitors on the depth of carrosion were studied.
It wos found that the attack was reduced when a portion of the uranium wos present in the trivalent state, but the
results were not reproducible. ] —
Also, o few tests were carried out in loops constructed from nickel, stainless steels, iron, Hastelloy B,
molybdenum, and nicbium.
A limited amount of work was done on Inconel loops circulating alkali metal~bose mixtures (NaF, LiF, KF,
UF,) with portions of the uranium in the trivalent state. Reduced ottacks were found, but disproportienation and
production problems require additional study.
CONCLUSIONS
From the data presented in this report it may be
concluded that molten mixtures of NaF, ZrF ,, and
UF, may be circulated for several thousand hours
in low-velocity nonisothermal Inconel systems.
After 2000 hr of operation the corrosion depth in
such a system will be deeper than desirable but
will still not be excessive. A depth of about
0.010 in. will be reached in 500 hr; after this the
depth will increase at a rate of 0.004 in. per
additional 1000 hr of operation.
The corrosion of the Inconel takes place by
selective leaching of chromium metal from the
hotter surface of a nonisothermal system, The
removed chromium is reploced on the surface by
diffusion from the center, but since no inward
diffusion takes place, voids
surface of the metal.
The principal removal reaction is
QUF‘i + Cr— EUF:3 + CtFy
form under the
accompanied by the reverse reaction to form
chromium metal in the cold leg. With short
operating times a large portion of the attack
takes place by enough chromium being leached
from the wall to reach the equilibrium concen-
tration necessary for the mass transfer reactions
to take ploce, It is known that other mass
transfer reactions may occur when the uranium is
not present, and these may also be of secondary
importance when uranium is present, Neither
the nature nor the location of the rate-controlling
step has been determined. The diffusion of
chromium to the hot-leg surfoce has been shown
not to be controlling.
With present production techniques for the
fluoride mixtures, the nickel, iron, and hydrogen
fluoride impurities are reduced to levels where
they no longer play a vital part in the corrosion
mechanisms; however, if they are present in the
zirconium fluoride—base mixtures, they will
cause attack in the loop hot legs.
The most important variable controlling the
depth of corrosion is the maximum wall temper-
ature. The wall temperature is more critical
than the maximum average bulk fluoride tempera-
ture. While wall temperature is important, it must
be a relative temperature; appreciable attack is
found only at the hottest point in a loop no matter
what the actual temperatures are, Variables of
secondary importance are uranium concentration,
loop size and shape, and temperature drop.
The replacement of a portion of the UF; content
of a batch with UF,, either in the production
procedure or by the addition of reducing agents,
will provide reduced depths of attack. The UF,
has only a limited solubility in zirconium fluoride—
base mixtures, so all the uranium cannot be
present in the trivalent form. These mixtures are
difficult to control during production, ond dis-
proportionation of the UF; may occur, causing the
formation of hot-leg deposits.
While Inconel is on acceptable material for
present reactors, it will not be adequate for
future larger reactors. With zirconium fluoride—
base fluoride mixtures at 1500°F, niobium, mo-
lybdenum, and Hastelloy B show promise as
future reactor materials. Some reduction in depth
of attack may be obtained in alloys similar to
Inconel but with reduced chromium concentration.
The stainless steels did not plug with these
fluoride mixtures, as they did in the case of the
alkali-metal-base fluoride mixtures, but they still
are not as good as Inconel.
The addition of UF, fo alkali-metal-base fluoride
mixtures also resulted in a reduction in depth of
attack in Inconel loops. The solubility of UF,
is higher in this system, but mixtures of UF,
and UF , were still necessary. While this mixture
shows promise for future use, production and
disproportionation problems remain to be solved,
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
Equipment
Most of the loops used for this study were
slightly modified from those originally de-
veloped;! the modifications are discussed in
detail below (“‘Loop Size ond Shape’). The
expansion pot was reploced by a length of pipe of
the same size as that used for the loop itself.
The fill line and spark plug probe entered the
sides of this pipe through Swagelok fittings. A
typical loop is shown in Fig. 1. Most of the loops
were constructed from IPS ¥%-in. sched=10 pipe,
but, if this wos not available, IPS ]fz-in. sched-40
pipe was used as an altemate, No changes were
made in the auxiliary equipment.
Procedure
The operating procedure remained essentially
the same os that used for the alkali-metal-fluoride
6. M. Adamson, W. D. Manly, and R. S. Crouse,
Interim Report on Corrosion by Alkali-Metal Fluorides:
Work to May 1, 1953, ORNL-2337 (Mar. 20, 1959).
work,! except for the addition of a cleaning step,
which consisted in circulating another batch of
fluorides for 2 hr before the loop was filled with
the test mixture.
All the molten fluorides used in this study were
mixed and purified by the ANP Chemistry Section
of the Materiols Chemistry Division.? The
purification procedure included treatment with
both hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen goses at
elevated temperature followed by o prolonged
stripping operation with hydrogen and helium,
During the latter part of this study the batch size
was increased, from 50 |b, to 250 |b; however, for
handling and use, these batches were subdivided
into 50-lb batches. The batching down was
carried out while the mixture was molten, and the
usual steps were taken to avoid contamination.
Once a pot was filled, it was held under a positive
helium pressure at all times. Helium gas was
allowed to leak to the atmosphere whenever a
connection was made or broken. During the
actual transfer to a loop, helium pressures were
maintained in both the loops and the fill pot.
The rate of transfer was controlled by adjusting
the difference between these pressures,
The liquid level in the loop was controlled by
the location of the outlet from the transfer line.
When o signal was obtained on the spark-plug
probe, which was located above this level, the
helium pressure in the loop was increased and
the excess liquid was transferred back to the fill
pot. After the loop reached operating temperature,
any excess liquid resulting from expansion was
blown back to the fill pot. A sample of the
original liquid was trapped in an enlarged section
of the transfer line for chemical analysis.
After the loop had operated for the desired
time, the power was turned off and the liguid
allowed to freeze in place. The loops were then
sectioned as shown in Fig. 2, The material was
melted out of the 2-in. sections in an inert-atmos-
phere fumace; the pipe sections were sent for
metallographic examination, and the fluorides for
chemical analysis, Sections 1A, 2A, and 4A
were stored in a dry box as reserve samples,
The ends of the other sections were covered with
tape., The loop sections were stored for three
months; then, if they had not been used, they
were sent to salvage.
*E. F. Joseph et al,, Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion
Fluoride Fuel Preparation Facility, ORNL CF-54-6-126
(June 1, 1954).
UNCLASSIFIED
PHOTO 21341
Fig. 1. Thermal Convection Loops.
——
ve
{-in. RESERVE METALLOGRAPHIC
SAMPLE
2-in. METALLOGRAPHIC SAMPLE
4-in. DRY-BOX SAMPLE (CHEMICAL)
2-in. METALLOGRAPHIC SAMPLE
6-in. CHEMICAL SAMPLE, SPECIAL
LOOPS ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED
ORNL-LR-DWG 48763
5| €-in. CHEMICAL SAMPLE, SPECIAL
LOOPS ONLY
4| 2-in. METALLOGRAPHIC SAMPLE
2| 5-in.DRY-BOX SAMPLE (CHEMICAL)
3| 2-in. METALLOGRAPHIC SAMPLE
f!f"e in,
st
N
Fig. 2. Location of Metallographic and Chemical Samples. Standard loops.
The amount of attack was determined by
metallographic exomination. Uncertainties in
the original pipes, in cleaning the surfaces after
operation, and in determining losses from extesmol
oxidation prevented the use of weight loss data.
The depth of attack was determined by the depth
of the deepest void formation found metallographi-
cally in a traverse of an entire circumference of a
section. Other than classifying the intensity as
moderate, heavy, etc., no attempt was made to
determine the amount of the attack. Typical
sections of each type are shown in Fig. 3. Wall
thicknesses were measured microscopically, and
it was shown that no large, even surface remcval
type of attack was taking place; however, smoll
amounts less than the normal variation in pipe
wall thickness would not be measurable. For
UNCLASSIFIED
T 5183
Fig. 3.
Light; () moderate; (c) heavy, 250X. Reduced 29%.
i
’ ’ 1
vy = - < - * o? ' 4 e
- "
' e - . w |
)- . / —{\“ { - " rg
e & =
s . e “ | T
e o e J ) ok
4 ) " r'- 2 d' S
o . s B L . " Leot]
. g AT Ve
- \l‘ Fe 3 i 3 o0b
il o | T'T';*'p g ..-"‘A:h
L B - r [ L& i, S —
e e R el
« : . bk e T e
i - = - 3 - ¢ N | :
. 1 - - _‘E_L..
Photomicrographs lllustrating Various Intensities of Attack as Reported for Fluoride Corrosion.
each loop, at least two sections from the hottest
area were examined to determine the maximum
attack.
The fluoride mixtures used in this study are
referred to by number, identified in
Table 1,
and are
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fluoride 30 in Inconel Loops
Standard Loops. — A considerable number of
loops were operated under what were considered
to be standard conditions. These loops circu-
lated a zirconium fluoride mixture for 500 hr with
a hot-leg temperature of 1500°F and a tempera-
ture drop of about 225°F,
general groups,
They fall into two
The first group were operated
UNCLASSIFIED
T 5185
BRI
o
-
.
-
5
a
i
"
.
!
3
—
o
k-]
"
{a)
Table 1. Composition of Molten Fluoride Mixtures
Fluecride UFai NaF ZrF4
Ne. Weight % Mole % Weight % Mole % Weight % Mole %
27 10.9 4.0 16.7 46.0 72.4 50.0
30 11.4 4.0 19.0 50.0 69.6 46.0
31 20.1 50.0 79.9 50.0
44 18.6 6.5 20.5 53.5 60.9 40.0
either as preliminary loops to outline the problems
to be encountered with this mixture or as control
loops for some of the early studies. These loops
were not precleaned, and close control of con-
ditions had not yet been established., The second
group were run as controls for later studies, and
all were precleaned. While some scatter in re-
sults still exists in this second group, the
reproducibility, especially during the fluoride
production, was much better than was found in
the early loops. The data for the first group are
tabulated in Table 2 and those for the second
group in Table 3,
It is apparent from Table 2 that a variation in
maximum depth of attack from 5 to 18 mils was
from supposedly duplicate loops. With
many of these loops the iron and nickel impurity
concentrations of the original fluorides were also
high, but the maximum depth of attack did not
vary in a systematic manner with these concen-
trations. Another cause of variation in attack
was an undetermined amount of hydrogen fluoride
left in the fluoride mixture from the purification
process. This hydrogen fluoride would react
with the loop wall, producing iron and nickel
fluorides which in turn would reduce the chromium,
When this group of loops were operated, no suit-
oble method waos available for measuring the
found
hydrogen fluoride concentration.
When a method became available for measuring
the hydrogen fluoride content of the mixtures, it
was found to be necessary to increase the
stripping time after purification to reduce the
hydrogen fluoride to acceptable levels. The
control loops tabulated in Table 3 were those in
which the controlled fluoride batches were circu-
lated., While considerable variation is still
found in the maximum depths of attack, it is not
as great as in Table 2,
The loops in Table 3 are tobulated approxi-
mately in the order in which they were filled or
in order of time. |f this table is divided into
quarters and average moximum ottacks calculated
for each quarter, it may be noted that the depths
of attack are higher at the end, that is, that the
attack is graduclly increasing with time, The
average depth for the entire table was 9.1 mils,
while the attack for the four quarters averaged
7.0, 9.2, 9.6, and 10.5 mils, respectively. As a
comparison, the average in Table 2 was 10.1 mils.
The poorer control of production with the large
batches was responsible for some of the increase
but not for all of it, since the trend was a gradual
one, Neither the other causes of this gradual
increase nor the cause of the occasional very
deep attacks has been determined. The increased
purging time and closer control in the second
group have made the ottack more consistent but
have not resulted in a large average reduction in
maximum depth of attack. Since the average
chromium content in the fluorides after operation
of the loops in Table 2 is higher than after
operation of those tabulated in Table 3, there
oppears also to be a reduction in intensity of
attack over the entire loop with the controlled
batches.
In an effort to determine whether air contami-
nation during filling or operation could be re-
sponsible for the variation in ottack, o series of
loops were operated with fluoride batches which
had been deliberately contaminated. Loops were
operated under three conditions: (1) with helium
pressure only during filling, (2) with no protective
atmosphere combined with a small air leak, and
(3) with a l-liter volume of air bubbled through
the batch before transfer. The loop with no
protective atmosphere and a slow leck developed
an attack of 21 mils in 500 hr, which was double
Toble 2. Data from Preliminary Control Loops?
Fluoride Mixture
Anclysis of Flueride Mixture
i Eluoiide Barch Aftost Nickel (ppm) Iron (ppm) Chromium (ppm) Uranium (%)
o Ne. No. tnnty Reptiei) e M DiEm - A0y B i See e
234 27 Lak Light 5 530 <30 4100 600 1460 1900 8.3 9.2
236° 27 Lab Moderate 10 610 <30 2900 1000 1070 2400 7.9 9.2
244 27 Moderate 9 140 <20 540 100 <20 1450 8.2 5.0
245 27 Moderate 12 340 <20 340 100 75 1500 8.4 9.3
2610 30 Lab Moderate 6 <20 150 950
273 30 Moderate 10 <20 60 860 175 160 1200 8.6 2.0
272 30 Moderate 16 720 30 520 200 45 1350 8.3 7.0°
283 30 d Heavy 15 1100 40 740 100 100 2800°¢ 4.6 5.1
280 30 EE-58 Heavy 8 85 <20 430 50 <20 1000 8.6 9.7
287 30 EE:50 Heavy 13 30 20 520 60 <20 1450 8.8 9.1¢
282 30 e Moderate 9 40 <20 520 30 <20 1100 8.9 8.9
289 30 EE-59 Heavy 8 95 20 620 60 230 900 8.8 9.5
295/ 30 EE-63 Heavy 6 145 <20 625 30 <20 1100 8.8 9.4
296 30 EE-63 Heavy 8 40 20 470 45 90 1050 8.9 9.1
284 30 d Heavy 12 500 <20 1000 40 1450 1400 9.0 9.2
310 30 R-110/ Heavy 9 40 <20 265 50 <20 900 8.6 9.0
307 30 e Heavy 5 90 <20 235 30 <20 1100 9.0 8.8
298 30 EE-68 Heavy 9.5 40 <20 550 25 100 1100 8.6 8.9
343/ 30 EE-106 Heavy 18 75 <20 210 50 890 1500¢ 9.0 8.9
324% 30 EE-92 Heavy 15 60 <20 c 45 250 1300 8.6 8.9
345/ 30 EE-113 Heavy 6 40 <20 65 45 120 600 9.0 9.2
326 44 EE-114 Heavy 750 <20 500 65 250 1100 14.4 14.0°
381 44 EE-140 Heavy 10 <20 <20 175 120 50 700 14.6 12.0°
387 44 EE-145 Haovy 16.5 <20 <20 395 90 135 700 15.3 15.5¢
10 (av) 1190 (av)
PAll loops circulated o zirconium fluoride mixture for 500 hr with a hot-leg temperature of 1500°F and a cold-leg temperature averaging 1300°F,
Loop treated with hydrogen.
“Considerable spread was found in the individual values.
4p: melted.
“Made in grophite.
Loop cleaned with flucride mixture 31,
Table 3. Data from Contrel Loops”
Fluoride Mixture Analysis af Fluoride Mixture
Lnnp EE Attack
Na. Fluaride e — e i Nickel (ppm) Chremium (ppm) Iren (ppm) Uranium (%) HF®
No Batch Intensity Depth (mils)
¥ b Before After Befare After Before After Before After
352 30 19 Moderate 5.5 <20 <20 50 450 110 60 8.8 9.4
353°¢ 30 e Heavy 3 <20 <20 50 600 130 75 8.8 9.1 3.6
3609 30 19 Heavy 4.5 <20 <20 100 500 100 70 8.7 9.0° 3.7
380/ 30 141 Heovy 7 <20 <20 95 700 185 90 8.7 8.9
382 30 155 Heavy 10 <10 <10 70 800° 65 90 8.6 8.6 2.2
383 30 150 Heavy 9 <10 <10 115 900 95 %0 9.0 B.5 2.1
384 30 150 Heavy 12 <20 <10 75 950 130 85 8.4 8.6 1.1
421 30 150 Heavy 5 <10 <10 100 800 110 300¢ B.8 8.6 3.0
435 30 160 Heavy 8 <10 <10 &5 400 40 70 8.6 8.8 2.5
440 30 158 Heavy g <10 <10 60 500 40 60 8.6 9.2
442 30 155 Heavy 10 <10 <10 80 800 150 60 8.5 8.6 4.6
4449 30 158 Heavy 8 120 <10 90 400 85 70 8.9 9.5 6.7
469 30 162 Heavy 8 25 15¢ 90 700% 55 70 8.5 8.8 0.9
462 44 203 Heavy 10 as <10 35 400 50 45 13.9 13.7¢ 2.8
463 44 203 Heavy 10 i5 <10 30 475 50 45 13.2 13.5° 2.5
540 30 188-1 Heavy 1 10 15 40 520 30 80 8.5 8.6 2.1
545 30 198 Heavy n 40 <10 70 400 65 70 9.5 8.8 1.7
571 30 232-8 Heavy 5 25 25 55 900¢ 165 e B.6 B.6
554 30 188-7 Heavy n 30 <10 80 600 90 60 8.5 B.6 2.7
570 30 232-8 Moderate 9 20 25 75 850 70 100 8.2 8.8 1.2
577 30 228-12 Heavy 9 40 40 45 850 85 80 B.9 9.2 0.5
586 44 239-3 Heavy 12 6 <10 50 800° 45 90° 14.0 13.7 0.5
607 44 241 Heavy 12 50 50 65 700 95 80 14,0 14.3 0.1
608 44 241 Heavy g 25 50 50 700 80 75 14.1 14.1 0.1
609 30 223-1 Heavy 7.5 <1 20 50 e 145 40 8.9 9.1 0.7
610 30 223-1 Heavy 1 <1 20 50 1000 145 50 8.9 8.7 0.7
651 30 513-4 Heavy 9 10 e 110 800 75 70 8.3 8.4 1.0
684 30 246-1 Heavy 11 15 10 55 200 255 50 8.9 9.1 1.2
685 30 246-1 Heavy 14 5 5 60 700 30 40 8.9 9.0 1.3
686 30 246-1 Heavy 9 15 10 80 775 60 15 8.8 9.0 1.5
698 30 434-R Moderate 10 9 10 40 800 105 55 B.6 8.9 1.5
700 30 246-4 Heavy 13 5 25 45 625 120 65 8.9 9.1 1.9
2.1 (av) 675 (av)
%A1l loaps circulated a zirconium flucride mixture for 500 he with a hot-leg temperature of 1500°F and a cold-leg temperature averaging 1300°F,
bRelative readings on Solubridge ofter bubbling 2 liters of helium through bath and then through boric acid.
“No cleaning.
dNu trap.
“Individual results vary,
ICurved loop.
—— e R e e e e e ——E
that found in the control loops. The other two
loops developed maximum depths of attack within
the usual spread. However, in loop operation
there is only a remote possibility that develop-
ment of a leak and failure of the protective gas
system would occur simultaneously.
When the gradual increase in attack became
apparent, loops 684, 685, and 686 were filled on
the same day from the same batch of fluorides.
The operators were watched and were extremely
careful to avoid any operation that could permit
contamination, The attack in 500 hr in these
loops was 11, 14, and 9 mils, respectively.
Since a variation was still found, these loops
indicated that the trouble was not from careless
operators or from the batch, Changes in the
batches could have caused the grodual increase
but not the wide and unpredictable variations.
As yet, no satisfactory explanation has been
offered for these variations.
To illustrate the distribution of attack around
the loop and to support the procedure of basing
conclusions primarily on the sample from the top
of the hot leg, loop 833 was sectioned in con-
siderable detail as shown by Fig. 4; the metallo-
graphic data from this loop are given in Table 4;
Fig. 5 shows typical photomicrographs from the
various loop sections. These data confirm the
fact that the maximum aottack was found at the
top of the hot leg. Very little attack was found
in the hot horizontal leg, and a gradual increase
in depth was found in moving up the vertical hot
leg. This increase was more gradual than was
found in o similar examination of a loop in which
alkali-metal-base fluorides were circulated, but
otherwise the two loops were similar.! The
attack depth decreased rapidly above the heated
area, and this will be discussed in more detail
below (‘“‘Effect of Temperature'’)., The three
samples from under the upper half of the top
heater checked each other very well,
Operating Time. — Since thermal loops have no
moving parts or mechanical seals, they are ideal
for long-time operation. The limiting feature in
such loops is the life of the heoting elements,
which can be replaced during operation only with
Table 4. Metallographic Examination of Sectioned Loop 833
Section Mo,
Metallegraphic Notes
1 Heavy surface pitting to 0.5 mil with heavy intergranular
subsurface veoids to 12 mils
1A Heavy surface pitting to 0.5 mil with heovy intergranular
subsurface void formation to a depth of 11 mils
2 Heavy surface pitting to 0.5 mil with heavy intergranular
subsurface voids to 9 mils
m N O ot B W
Light, shallow surface roughening
Moderate surface pits to 0.5 mil
Light, shallow surfoce roughening
Moderate surfoce pits ta 0.5 mil
Some as section 6
Moderate to heavy general subsurface void formation to a
maximum depth of 5 mils
9 Heavy surface pitting to 1 mil with intergronulor subsurfoce
voids to 6.5 mils
10 Some as section 9
11 Heavy surface pitting ta 1 mil with heavy general subsurface
voids to 3 mils
12 Heavy surface pitting te a depth of 1 mil
UNCLASSIFIED
ORNL-LR-DWG 48764
&
7 Sin __ ©
T-8870 (8] . ~
{in. 8
1al fin.
T-8871 i
r-ss7z|'| 5™
T 1
4in, 2in.
f
.L 5] T-8880
T-8873|2] 2in.
*
5in.
Y
T-8874 (19| in,
:
6in
J 4] T-8879
T-8875 (101 lin.
; j
4in 5IIT'I.
| :
3] T-8878
: T
© 12
M
¢ b
&z = |
P N
M
1
%‘.l i T
M -
Fig. 4. Location of Metallographic Sections from Loop 833.
10
*%GE pesnpay *gfg dooT punody 3ooiy Ul UONDMDA °G 614
n __ =
Lo s |