-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-3122.txt
8313 lines (6438 loc) · 292 KB
/
ORNL-3122.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
/ MASTER
g iase / ' ORNL-3122
UC-80 — Reactor Technology
MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR PROGRAM
PROGRESS REPORT
FOR PERIOD FROM
AUGUST 1, 1960, TO FEBRUARY 28, 1961
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an
agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States
Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal
liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process
disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately
owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,
process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or
otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any
agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein
do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States
Government or any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegible In
electronic image products. Images are produced
from the best available original document.
- ORNL=-3122
UC-80 — Reactor Technology
TID-4500 (16th ed.)
Contract No. W-T4LO5-eng-26
MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR PROGRAM
PROGRESS REPORT
FOR PERIOD FROM AUGUST 1, 1960, TO FEBRUARY 28, 1961
R. B. Briggs, Progrém Director
Date Issued
JUN 27. 1961
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPPORATION
for the
U.S5. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
~ THIS PAGE
‘WAS INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
SUMMARY
PART I. MSRE DESIGN, COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERTNG ANALYSIS
1. MORE Deslgn
Design efforts on the MSRE continued on all fronts. Although findings of con-
tinuing studies necessitated some revisions, both the goals of the experiment and
the basic design of the plant remained unchanged. The reactor is to provide facili-
ties for demonstration of salety, dependability, and. serviceability of molten-salt
systems and is intended to produce information on the behavior of graphite under
irradiation and in contact with molten salts.
The reactor, fuel pump, and heat exchanger will be located in the reactor cell.
A component and process-piping layout was completed with a check of thermal stresses
in the piping. Layout of auxiliary connections is in progress. Checking of thermal
stresses in the coolant piping is in progress. The drain-tank area layout is under
revision following the decision to eliminate freeze flanges from the drain.lines in
the initial construction.
Detail drawings of the reactor were completed. A set of five molybdenum bands
was included in the midplane of the graphite core to restrain bowing of the -string-
ers caused by the fast-flux gradient. Iour "poison tubes" are intended to introduce
nuclear poison in the reactor to balance reactivity changes stemming from xenon
sorption or potential fuel abscorption in the moderator graphite. The fuel fraction
in the core was raised to 22.5%, minimizing the nuclear consequences of such even-
tualities. The design of the air-cooled radiator and drain tanks was completed.
The off-gas system piping is designed to accommodate either fresh or recycle
helium. The xenon decay was increased to 72 days minimum so that the radioactivity
of the stored helium should not exceed 15 curiles.
Salt-containing lines and components will be provided with heaters capable of
heating the system to 1250°F. Heating units were designed for the reactor, drain
tanks, and piping. ’
Specifications were prepared for the single-arm remote-maintenance manipulator.
Design of individual tools and racks is in progress.
Heat-balance and neutron-lcvel measurementc occrve as the indicators of reactor
power. Autumatic control of reactor power appears necessary because of the slug-
gishness of the system and uncertainties of graphite. The poison tubes provide a
total of 12% Ak/k for control purposes. Interlocking functions will control the
heat withdrawal at the radiator.
Building and site improvements will be accomplished in four steps; scheduled
for completion by October 1961. . Engineering is progrescing comsistent with thilsg
goal. Shielding requiremento were eslablished, and specification and design of
services and utilities are in progress.
aes
Construction work on the reactor will be divided between lump-sum and cost-
plus-fixed-fee contractors to accomplish the work most economically. The installa-
tion of the reactor is to be completed by July 1963.
2. Component Development
Design of an improved freeze flange for 6-in. molten-salt piping was completed,
and such flanges are being fabricated for testing. Freeze flanges of the original
design for 3- 1/2-in. and b-in. pipe passed a test consisting of 104 thermal cycles
without mechanical failure, although excessive gas leakage occurred.
Freeze valves opened by direct resistance heating, by induction heating, and
by Calrod heaters were tested successfully; the latter were adopted for the MSRE.
Prototype heaters for the MSRE piping and the core vessel were fabricated for
‘testing.
A sampler-enricher concept devised for the MSRE operates within a two-chambered
dry box located above and to one side of the reactor pit. A mockup of its drive
mechanism, latch, sample capsule, connecting tube, latch stop, and capsule guide was
built and tested. A solder freeze valve to isclate the sampler during maintenance
was developed.
Flow tests of the MSRE core were conducted in a one-fifth-scale model. Proper
Tlow distribution in the entrance volute, the vessel cooling annulus, and the bottom
plenum chamber was verified. :
A test unit was built to evaluate titanium, uranium, and other materials for
use as high-temperature oxygen getters in helium streams.
A maintenance philosophy including both remote and semidirect operations was
evolved for the MSRE. The remote-maintenance demonstration facility was operated
successfully with salt following extensive maintenance, thereby ‘completing the demon-
stration. The facility is ‘being converted to the study of sample MSRE problems, the
first of which is replacement of the fuel pump. A one-twelfth-scale model of the
MSRE is being constructed; the reactor cell was completed.
A program to develop a remotely brazed Jjoint was started. Several mechanical
disconnects for auxiliary lines were procured and tested. '
Operation of long-term forced-circulation corrosion test loops was concluded.
Two natural-convection salt loops were placed in service to investigate the compati-
bility of graphite, molybdenum, and INOR-8 in MSRE fuel.
A facility for water-testing the MSRE fuel pump was completed, and various
dynamlc and hydraulic characteristics were determined.
- The design of the hot-test prototype of the MSRE fuel pump was completed, and
. fabrication was started. Procurement was initiated for cast INOR- 8 hydraulic parts
and for the drive motors and the variable-frequency supply. An experiment was pre-
pared to determine the amount of gas back -diffusing from the pump bowl into the
lubrlcatlon system. :
A survey was made of thermal stresses in the MSRE primary-pump tank, and cor-
rective design action was taken in those areas where the stresses are excessive.
v
The design of the hot-test stand for the MSRE fuel pump was completed, and
fabrication was started. Design of the water test stand for the MSRE coolant pump
was essentially completed.
The pump containifig a salt-lubricated journal bearing continues to operate
satisfactorily after 7440 hr at 1225°F, including 72 stops and starts.
The small frozen-lead-sealed pump failed after 22,000 hr of operation, appar-
ently as a result of erosion of the shaft by metal oxides.
Design and fabrication of the MSRE engineering test loop were completed.
Several types of cnd seals are being developed for use as cold end seals for
mineral-insulated sheathed thermocouples in MSRE installations.
Kemote electrical, therfiocouple, and instrument disconnects have been developed
for use in the MSRE. Prototypes of the electrical and thermocouple disconnects were
fabricated and were tested in a remote-maintenance facility.
A float-type, electric transmitting continuous level indicator is being devel-
oped for measurement of salt levels in the MSRE pump bowls.
The feasibility of.using inductance probes for single-point measurement of
molten-salt levels is being investigated.
3. Reactor Engineering Analjsis
A number of survey-type calculations were performed to obtain information con-
_cerning various alternative designs for the MSRE core. Dividing the core into two
or three concentric cylindrical regions having different fuel volume fractions did
not lead to sufficient decrease in circulating-system inventory or sufficient im-
provement in the power-density shape to justily the additional complications arising
in fabrication of a multiregion core.
The reactivity worth of the proposed control poison tubes was estimated using
a two-group, two-dimensional model with group constants derived from multigroup,
one-dimensional calculations. The results ihdicate that the proposed four tubes
have a total worth of 11% Ak/k and that the tubes may be cut off 1 ft below the top
of the core without serious loss of reactivity worth.
Preliminary nuclear calculations were completed for an MSRE core having the
fuel separated from the graphite by INOR-8 tubes. For a core with 8 vol % fuel
salt, insertion of 30-mil-thick 2-in.-diam INOR-8 tubes increased the critical
circulating-system inventory by about TC%; the percentage of fissions caused by
thermal neutrons decreased from 92% to about 88%; the average number of fission
neutrons released per neutron absorbed in fuel was reduced from 2.02 to 2.00; and
the temperature coefficient of reactivity due Lo expansion of the core salt was re-
duced by about 1%.
Eetimates were made of the dose rates at various places outside the reactor
cell. Above the reactor-cell top plug, having a thickness of 7 ft of ordinary con-
crete, the dose rate during 10-Mw operation was estimated to be 90 mr/hr. Above
the drain-tank-cell top plug, having a thickness of 6 ft of ordinary concrete, the
dose rate immediately after draining the reactor core was estimated to be 62 mr/hr;
2 hr after draining the core this dose rate was 0..47 mr/hr, and the integrated dose
over a long period of time amounted to less than 25 mr.
R
'PART II. MATERTALS STUDIES .
L. Metallurgy
Examinations were completed on two INOR-8 forced-convection loops which oper-
ated with fluoride mixtures for 8,100 and 14,500 hr. Attack in the form of surface
roughening and pitting to a maximum depth of 1-1/2 mils was found in the former; the
latter showed no attack, except for the formation of a thin surface layer. Examina-
tions of two Inconel forced-convection loops, which operated with fluoride mixtures
for periods of 13,150 and 15,000 hr, revealed attack in the form of intergranular
void formation to maximum depths of 13 and 24 mils, respectively.
Two thermal-convection loop tests were started to determine the compatibility -
of the system salt-graphite-molybdenum-INOR-8, with the molybdenum in intimate con-
tact with both the graphite and the INOR-8. The purpose of these tests is to con-
firm the feasibility of utilizing molybdenum bands to prevent lateral distortion of
the graphite bundle in the MSRE core.
During routine welder-qualification tests on INOR-8, weld cracking was observed
in some heats of material. A study is therefore being made to determine the reasons
for the cracking and to develop methods for alleviating the condition. The addition
of 2 wt % Nb to INOR-8 appears to completely overcome weld-metal cracking on the
materials investigated. The Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute hot-ductility test is
being used to determine the base-metal cracking susceptibility of several heats of
INOR-8. Heats which have been shown to be subject to heat-affected-zone cracking
also have exhibited poor hot ductility in this test. '
The development of techniques for producing solidified-metal seals for molten-
salt reactor applications is continuing. An INOR-8 sump-type seal with gold-copper
alloy operated successfully for ten closures. A metallographic evaluation of a
Reactor Division sump-type seal was also conducted. A seal utilizing an impregnated--
metal-fiber compact was also successfully operated, and the experiment is described.
Investigations of Ni-Mo-Cr-Fe alloys had shown that an intermetallic compound
formed at compositions above the upper limits specified for INOR-8. The investiga-
-tion was continued to determine whether or not the intermetallic phase would form
in alloys within the upper compositional limits of INOR-8. Microstructural examina-
tions were made of a number of alloys with compositions within the range of interest
which had been heat treated for various times and temperatures. The results of this
investigation to date strongly indicate that the intermetallic phase will not pre--
cipitate from alloys within the compositional limits of INCR-8.
The allowable design stresses for INOR-8 were.altered as a result of the ac-
quirement of more complete properties data and the application of more critical
criteria. These criteria include a consideration of radiation damage effects.
Tensile data were obtained for cast INOR-8 and creep and stress-rupture testing
is projected.
A study of the effect of notches on INOR-8 stress-rupture characteristics was
started. Initial results indicate that a notch with a 0.005-in. radius does not
significantly weaken the material.
A radiographic technique was used to determine the distribution of LiF-BeFo-
- ThFL-UFY (67-18.5-14-0.5 mole %) salt in specimens of nine grades of low-permeability
graphite following their exposure to the salt for 100 hr at 150 psig at 1300°F. It
indicated that graphite can be made that will take up salt only in shallow (<50-mil)
surface 1mpregnat10n unider ‘the above conditions.
vii
The quantity of salt that can be forced into graphite may be increased %y
prior heating of the graphite in air, which probably enlarges the pore spaces of
the graphite.
When in contact with oxygen-contaminated graphite at l300°F, LiF-BeF,-ThFy-UF),
(65-30.5-4-0.5 mole %) precipitated uranium as UOp. Under similar conditions,
LiF-BeFs-ThF)-UF), (67-18.5-14-0.5 mole %) did not develop & precipitate that could
be detected radiographically, while LiF-BeF,-ZrF)-ThF)-UF) (70-23-5-1-1 mole %)
developed a precipitate of monoclinic ZrO,. No other oxides were identified in the
precipitate by powder x-ray diffraction analysis.
Oxygen was not removed effectively from graphite by 20- and 100-hr purges with
molten LiF-BeF,-UF), (62-37-1 mole %) or LiF-BeFp-ThF),-UF), (67-18.5-14-0.5 mole %).
Similar purges with NaF-ZrF)-UF) (50-46-U4 mole %) were more effective, although
this salt mixture does not remave all the uvaygen. .
Twenty-hour treatments of graphite by the thermal-decomposition products of
NI, F-HF at 1300°F (704°C) appeéar to effectively remove oxygen from graphite, so that
it can contain LiF-BeFp-UF) (62-37-1 mole %) for periods greater than 2000 hr at
1300°F (704°C) without a dectectable precipitate forming.
In 100-hr exposures of INOR-8 to the thermal-decomposition products aof NH), ¥« HF
crystals at 1300°F, a 0.0005-in.-thick reaction layer was produced on the INOR-8.
5. In-Pile Tests
The first two MSRE graphite-fuel capsule experiments (ORNL-MTR-47-1 and -2),
each containing four capsules, were examined in hot cells at the Battelle Memorial
JInstitute. In these capsules, delicate bhellows were used for encapsulating graphite
immersed in fused-salt fuel. Of the eight capsules examined, only one was found
intact; the bellows walls had ruptured in the other seven. It is bhelieved that ex-
pansion of the molten-salt fuel on melting (following a reactor scram) caused the
‘ruptures. fxamination of the graphite specimen from the intact capsule is discussed
below. '
A new capsule design has been made for the third 'experiment, based on somewhat
different criteria. One objective of this experiment, which also contains four cap-
sules, is to study samples of graphite that have been irradiated under conditions
more extreme than those expected in the MSRE reactor. For Lhis purpose two of the
four graphite samples will be impregnated with a modified MSRE fuel. A second ob-
jective is to detect changes in the wetting characteristics ot the fuel in contact
with graphite under high-temperature irradiation. For this purpose two capsules
will contain unimpregnated graphite of a type similar to that of the MSRE. A third
objective involves the inclusion of specimens of molybdenum, INOR-8, and pyrolytic
graphite in contact with both the graphite and the fuel to demonstrate the compati-
bility of the principal components of the MSRE system. The four capsules consist of
heavy-walled INOR-8 cylinders, each containing a l—l/h-in.—diam 3-in.-long graphite
cylinder. The upper half of each graphite cylinder is machined in the form of a
boat-like cavity to contain 5 cc of molten-salt fuel, 1n which the pyrolytic graph-
ite and the metal specimens will be cuspended. The remainder of the experiment
assembly is similar to that of the previous experiments.,
Results of the postirradiation examination of the SKA graphite specimen from
ORNL experiment 47-2 at Battelle Memorial Institute are given. Examination of the
- external surfaces of the graphite, up to 34X magnification, revealed that the sur-
faces generally appeared to be unaffected by the irradigtion. A study of & cross-
sectional face of the cylindrical graphite specimen by autoradiography and core-
drilling indicated that the major portion of the fission-product activity was on
viii
or very near to the exposed surfaces except for a plane of porosity that extended.
longitudinally through the cylinder. Intrusion of fuel salt occurred through this
.fault. The remainder of tfie interior graphite was relatively free of radiocactivity
with the exception of Cst Data derived by Battelle are not sufficient to
distinguish between mechanlsms which could explain the presence of cesium in these
internal areas, and additional radlochemlcal studies are being conducted on the
specimen at ORNL.
6. Chemistry
The MSRE fuel composition has been revised to include’ 5 mole % ZrFu and is now
LiF-BeFy-ZrF) -ThF),-UF), {70-23-5-1-1 mole %); the melting point is 442°C. The pur-
pose of the ZrF) is to serve as an oxide scavenger and to provide protection against
precipitation of UO,. When the Zer/UFu mole ratio in the liquid is high enough,
excess oxide under equilibrium conditions causes precipitation of ZrO, rather than
UOo. The protection due to ZrF) remains effective until the Zth/UFu mole ratio
fails to about 2. Also, at higher ZrF), concentrations there may be a benef1c1al
effect due to complexing of oxide ions by species such as Zrote. -
The density of the fuel, given by the eguation, p(g/ce) = 2 8L - 0. OOO56t( c),
is about 2. 5 at reactor temperatures; at these temperatures the vapor pressure is
negligible.
Slow freezing of the.fuel under conditions which favor segregation, glfies an
initial solidification of phases such as 6LiF- BeF2 Zth, thereby depletlng the Zth
concentration in the remaining unfrozen liquid. ,
Confusion was resolved in regard to the melting point of the MSRE coolant
(LiF-BeF,, 66-34k mole %); its melting point is L450°C.
The .solubility of BF3 in MSRE-type fuels is about 1000 times thal of noble
gases and is in a suitable range for nuclear control schemes involving a volatile
poison. Tests of the retention of BF3 on graphite gave a favorably low answer of
about 10 ppm.
Xenon poisoning due to diffusion of xenon into the.unclad graphite considered
for use in the MSRE is more serious than was previously recognized and is difficult
to remedy by merely decreasing the permeability of the graphite. The concentration
gradient controlling the diffusion of xenon in the graphite tends to steepen sharply
with lower gas permeabilities, giving an increased driving force which tends to
counteract the benefits of an increased resistance.
The capillary behavior of MSRE fuel in graphite corresponds satisfactorily to
the nonwetting performance expected from estimated surface tensions and measured
densities, at least in clean systems. Exposure of the salt and graphite to air
leads to the formation of oxide films at the interface and to superficial manlfesta—
tions of good wettlng
Proposed procedures for chemical analysis of the operating MSRE fuel are being'
actively developed. The problem is primarily one of modification of existing pro-
cedures to adapt them for use in the High-Radiation-Level Analytical Facility.
T. Engineering Research
The enthalpy of the MSRE fuel mixture (LiF- BeFo-ZrF), - ThFh UFL, 70-23-5-1-~1
mole %) was determined over the temperature range 100 to 800°C The mean value for
ix
the heat capacity of the liquid (between 550 and 800°C) was calculated to be 0.451
cal/g-°C; this agrees well with the value 0..458 cal/g-°C estimated from an empirical
relationship developed from data for similar salt systems. A preliminary value of
0.53 cal/g-°C was obtained for the heat capacity of the coolant mixture LiF—BeF2
(68-32 mole %) between LOO and 650°C.
Initial measurements of the viscosity of the fuel mixturé LiF-BeFo-ZrF)-ThF)-UF)
(70-23-5-1-1 mole %) indicate that, although the over-all results scatter widely,
kinematic viscosities based on the lower limits of three sets of data are in reason-
able agreement. Thus, at 650°C the data range from 2.05 to 3.15 centistokes and at
800°C, from 1.2 to 1.8 centistokes.
The study of heat transfer for the mixture LiF-BeF,-UF)-ThF}, (67-18.5-0.5-1L
mole %) flowing in heated Inconel and INOR-8 tubes was discontinued after 7050 hr of
circulation. A preliminary analvsis of the date shuwed no significant trend as a
funetion of The exposure time. The data lie on the average 25% below the general
heat-transfer correlation for other normal fluids in the range Nge = 10,000 to 20,000.
8. Tuel Processing
Rare earths, but not ThF), have a high solubility in solutions of SbFs in anhy-
drous hydrogen fluoride, which may have application to the problem of recovering
decontaminated ThF) from MSER blanket sall. The LiF compound formed with this rea-
gent, LiSbF,, was a monoclinic crystalline compound. It was found to be stable to
temperatures of 600°C or more, compared to a boiling point of ~150°C for SbFé.
MSRE fuel carrier salt (LiF-BeFs, 63-37 mole %) dissolved in boiling 90% HF -
10% water at an average rate of about 50 mils/hr for the first 10 min, but the rate
dropped to <10 mils/hr subsequently. The decrease in rate was probably due to a
layer of soft material on the surface of the salt, which dissolved more slowly than
the LiF.
A laboratory-model steady-state fluorinator was operated in four runs which
demonstrated that uranium could be recovered from a salt continuously. The primary
problem was corrosion; probably because the design of the apparatus required opera-
tion at high temperatures. With a 4O-min salt residence time and excess fluorine,
”98% of the uranium was removed in a one-stage fluorinator at about 650°C.
~ THIS PAGE
WAS INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
CONTENTS
SUMMARY . ieietevioneonoensosssessasvsssseessssassssenensssoossnsennsosessnssss 1dl
PART I. MSRE DESIGN, COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
1. MSRE DESIGN ......... e trasvavasnertertaneens 1
Introduction ...... cesesens cesseveasen teses et s e et ettt an s enss 1
Reactor Corc and Vcabel o Cacveseretevseasann 2
Fuel Heat Exchanger ...c.iiieitentersenesressncssssocssssnanssas L
>
9
-
Radiator ....cceveeiienieneennennne seeseas Geeeesuescesaseneanne
Drain Tanks ..veccecieersnonncensntnsecenersstosecnans cereseaeas
Eguipment Arrangement ......cceeeersescrscrssvcccasresosssnssssess 12
Cover-Gas System ...veeeevevnrrresaserserscscsnsrsasrsseessssssces 15
System Heaters .ieieiercrtecrsnsesossnsnsessssscansoscsssnassnss 16
Design Status of Remote-Maintenance System .......ce000v000e0ss 20
Reactor Control Design ...eeereencierensoressvrsssonsosscnscsnes 20
Design Status of Building and Site .....eevieevvrressoscscesanes 20
Reactor Procurement and Installation seeciierieecrccrenerreneeee 23
1.12.1 Division of Work and Schedules ....eevevvervncrscneees 23
1.12.2 Procurement of Components .ieevevsnsecovorevscansensnss 24
HHEHPRFEHF PP =
2 HEEN0 0= OV W D
| ol &)
2. COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT ....00veessssocessesosesocscsassssssscssssnssnas 26
2.1 Freeze-Flange Development ..eveescesesesssssscssscsscnsesesecase 26
2.1.1 MSRE 6-in. FlaN@e5 ..eeceveescecssoneacsssscccsssssseses 26
2,1.2 Freeze-Flange Thermal-Cycle Tests ..cceevveveversccanes 27
Fréeze VAlvVeD ...ciereecrecoerosocasssssvorscnossssssesovencones 27
HeBteT TeSTE +eveevsrernneeoorensraceansoncesasassoersasancnnes 28
2.3.1 Pipe Heaters ....cieeeerecccerecscsesccsossnsssensacesees 28
2.3.2 Core Healer .iivivrieievernssrenncievecsorsaresscncsssene 31
2.4 Sample-Enricher Development ....cceeeveneeersveecssonsassassee 31
2.4.1 Sampler-Enricher Concept ....eeeeeesvereveroesesesneass 31
2.k.2 Sampler-Enricher MOCKUD ...coveverennrsnnenncssnevasans 33
2.4.3 Solder Freeze VALVE ....eitvevvneresoannnccnennns ceees. 33
2,5 MSRE Core Development .....cvueeersrresencasnsceccssassssncnanne 37
2.6 Helium Purification .....cc.cu.... S ereresreeieasteanns et eeaeen Lo
2,7 MSRE Maintenance Development ........ccveevirnecescnccs R Ty
2.7.1 Maintenance PhiloEoPhY .eeovseveearrnsvansvsrsnsconrese LO
2.7.2 Remote-Maintenance Development Facility .........c..... 4O
2.7.3 Semidirect and Remote Tools ....ceeveececenees cecssesaas Lo
2.7T.4 MSRE MOAEL tvvinvnverrenssassossnnssonoansnesnssansnass LD
Brazed-Joint Development ..ceeeeeccerersrssossoncrsccsnsssnsesese L2
Mechanical-Joint Development ....veevsvscssssresosnssvsssscanes U2
Forced-Circulation Corrosion LOOPS ceeeveocrocscossscnsorsesceess Ll
Graphite-Molybdenum Compatibility Test .uiveeeececeverscacseses LUl
Pump Development .....cieveereeeceereoceronsoacosossssnerasnoeses L7
12,1 MSRE Fuel PUmp ...coverecvenncanccscrsanoarrnsnanass R
12,2 MSRE Coolant PUmp ..eveveveveeorssnnsovenerrsanosssese 53
.12.3 Advanced Molten-Salt Pumps ...cceceevvescvecsrsvsncaess 53
.12.4 Frozen-Lead Pump Seal ...c.vvvevnvivsscscrsesasansaess 53
2.13 MSRE Engineering Test LoOOD ..iveevressvsrrtrosaaanaesiriioassa «es 53
o
w N
l\)!\)l\)l\)
xi
3.
L,
5. IN-
>
p
6.
REACTOR ENGINEERING ANALYSIS .icesiienvococoonssonostococoonsns
IVIEI‘I‘ALIURGY- e 0 ¢ e e L] LA R B R SN R B A B R I A A A I ¢« s
C
2.14
3.1
3.2
3.3
3L
L1
L.2
P
.1
2
.
HEMIST
6.1
Q::::%:rrr
xii
MSRE Instrument Development ......eeveveeen. e .
lllllllllllll
2.14.1 Thermocouple End S€2L1S +vvveerenenoencenenseesensnonns
2.1
. 2:14.3 Pump-Bowl Level Indicator ............. ceretdereneren
2.14
Criticality Calculations ..... ceaeas teetrsesceacaccesenranaon e
Reactivity Worth of Control Tubes ......cceeeivvvvennensecoonss
Preliminary Calculations for Core Containing
INOR-8 TUDES tuvvvrsorosnonnnnaancnesen ceesstesracsreasrenans
MSRE Biological Shielding and Associated Dose Rates ......00...
PART II, MATERIALS STUDIES
Dynandc Corr051on Studles S e
1.1 Status of Test Program ....cieveeess e eresssssenns s e
.1.2 Examination of TNOR-8 LoOPS cvvvivrrnronesersnesonscnss
.1.3 Examination of Inconel LooPs .....e0:.. teestseeer s eana
.1.4 Molybdenum-Graphite Compatiblllty TeStS civvveeeroeanns
ding and Brazing Studies ......c.ivieiennnn ceesesesrenerranns
.2.1 Welding of INOR-8 .............- Ceretasreeeeieeresna .o
2,2 BSolidified-Metal.Seal Development ...... teesesensennana
.2.3 Sump-Type Seal Development ........... Ceviesacsaccriana
.2.4 Metal-Fiber Seal Development .............. Ceeeriteneas
OR-8 Development ...eoveeo.. ceee i teerecereereene b e e
%,3,1 Structural Stability of 18% Mo Alloys Ceebeneen
Mechanical Properties of INOR-8 ........... Cheteceseanas ceeenes
Impregnation of Graphite by Molten Salts ..... cesrerancnns o ees
4.5.1 Permeation Screening Tests on Large and
Small Pipe tvieevsveeesnsnas Ceresersenne cesserennnn
1.5.2 Oxidation and Permeation .........cevveeenes. Ceereei e
Precipitation of UOs from Fluoride Salts ....ecevevcovcenes .
Precipitation of Zr0O, from MSRE Fuel .........
Removal of Oxygen Contamination from Graphite ......... ceeseans
4.8.1 Purging with Molten Fluorides ............... ceereaeaas
4:8.2 Purging with Ammonium Bifluoride ........coiuveves Ceees
4.8.3 Reaction of INOR-8 with the Thermal-
Decomposition Products of NH4F-HF ........cc0veeeenes
II‘ETESTS * & 0 & 5 & % 0 S PP PSP S B SEEN A & 0 & 8 P PO b e P e PR RS Re S bR
Graphite-Fuel Capsule Experiments ........ccveveneeiinrenensan.
Examination of Graphite Specimen from Experiment
Om‘-u7-2 .I.II.O......I................l'l"'....C.'I......l.
Se Equilibrl‘mstudles ..... e 0 0 0 0 b B b .I....;.I....'II.I...
'Ihe SyStem LiF-Bng-ZI‘F4'~ThF4-UF4 ¢ s e P PRI ESIELIELEEIE PN
IIYhe SyS'temLiF-Bng-ZrFq. LI I R R N R B R R I I I I I I I B R A )
Phase Equilibria in the System NaF Bng-ThF4 cecsecoas
The System CsF-ZrFg ..iceseresitveersosessassnasonsnses
Crystal Structure of LiF- SbFS ciertesesserresaes oo s
Index to ORNL Work on Fused-Salt Phase Studies .......
Solubility of HF in Molten Fluorides .....cceevesecess
Solubility of BFs in MSRE-Type Fuels ..vevveveccrncenes
Freezing-Point Depressions in Sodium Fluoride ........
.1
.1
1
.1
.1.
1.
.1
.1
1
o1
o
L]
FJQ)EDLJO\v1¥?¢JhJP’
L,2 Instrument and Power Disconnects ........... Cerereenan ,
.4 Single-Point Level Device ..... chrsennene Ceirenaeas ces
'I'Ile SyStemLiF-BEFg e s 9t s s oe s LR I I A R N S S R A IR ) ‘
7.
8.
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
xiii
Oxide Behavior in Fuels ........
6.2.1 Identification of Oxides Precipitated from Fuels ......
6.2.2 Removal and Precipitation of Oxides from Fuels ........
Physical Properties .eeeeesess
6.3.1 Density of MSRE Fuel
® 0 & 0 & & & 6 0 b OSSR A S eSSt
LI I IR N B I R I B B N BN L I B B I I N LI I R ] » 0
6.3.2 Stochastic Correlation of Densities of Molten
Fluoride Fuels
e »
L N I N I BN B B DAY DAY BN DAY B L BN DN IR IR DN TN Y N I B I N L BN B B
6.3.3 Empirical Equation for Fluidity in LiF-BeFo-UF4
SVStem8 ..ceerevertovecerssesecscosrcassassasssesonsas
Graphite Compatibility .............
6.4,1 Xenon Diffusion in Graphite:
Absorption in Molten-Salt Reactors Containing
Graphite ........ )
6.4.2 Wetting of Graphite by MSRE Fused Sait ........ cersenas
b.4.3 Retention of BFs on Graphite in a Molten-
Salt ReBCtOr .vviuieerneorernveessoseescssarasseanssns
Analytical Chemistry ........
Effects of Xenon
2 8 & 8 & 0 ¥ ¢ 2 & RSP NSNS ESE SN
* o ¢ 0
LRI )
0 & 8 b 6 B & B BSOS ESEEN S eeos
6.5.1 Proposed Procedures for Analysis of the
MSRE Fuel ..........
6.5.2 Stripping Rate for CO, from Water in an
MSRE Pump-Demonstration System ........ cesessesarenen
mGImRmGRESE:ARCHI'...!-‘.'-I.
T.1
7.2
Physical-Property Measurements ..
T.1.1 Enthalpy and Heat Capacity
T.1l.2 Viscosity ..
L N BN I I B BN BN BRY BN BN NN BEY JNE O NN NN BN BN DN TR B BN BN IR I B BN N Y
o b & & & ¢ s e oo s bd e
Heat-Tra.nSfer S‘tU.d.ieS I R B N AR
® & & 0 & & & 2 e PO 0 &b e s hee e
® 0 & O ¥ PO GG E S S eeP e EEeEee
LI B B B BN I B B O N B N R N B R BN K RN N A
* 8 & 0 & & b e 0 S 8 b et s SESE S EEe
® ® 8 00 0 E 8PS PN P PSS SR s s de e
FUEL PROCEssmG LR R I A A R R R A R S R B R NI A A B A S I A B R R I A R RN A B I R R R Y R R R I A A B I ]
SbFS’HF‘ SOlU.tiOnS LI IR B BN I )
8.1
8.2
8.3
Dissolution Rates for MSRE Fuel Carrier Salt ...ceeeieescccenas
Steady-State Fluorinator
. o 800 00 ¢ & 0 s 8 b s b o e r b e s
I I A SR SR B R R NI N R R R R RN S )
PART |I. MSRE DESIGN, COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT,
AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
1. MSRE DESIGN
1.1 INTRODUCTTION
During the past six months, several revisions were made in the original MSRE
concept. The major concept did not change, however, and a large amount of design
work was accomplished. A very brief restatement of the original plan will be made
before taking up in some detail the features that have been modified.
The reactor consists of a graphite-moderated core encased in an INOR-8 con- S
tainer, through which is pumped a molten-salt mixture consisting of LiF, BeFo, S
ZrF),, ThFy, to which is added enough U232 in the form of UF), (approximately 0.25 ,
mole % UF)) to achieve criticality in the core. The reactor vessel, fuel circu-
lating pump, arid heat exchanger are located in the reactor containment cell.
The non-fuel-bearing coolant salt, LiF-BeF, (66-3k mole %) circulates through
the tube side of the heat exchanger and through the air-cooled radiator located out-
side the reactor cell. The coolant circulating pump is also located outside the
cell in the same general region as the radiator.
Drain tanks for the fuel salt are located in the drain-tank cell separate from
the reactor cell but having the same atmosphere and pressure requirements. One
addition was made to the drain-tank complex; a fourth tank for storage and subse-
quent batch-dispensing of spent fuel has been added. This fourth tank is located
in 4 separate but adjacent cell.
The essential changes in design have arisen from two insufficiently understood
properties of graphite: the extent of its permeation by fuel salt and the amount
of xenon holdup by the graphite.
Experiments have generally cstablished that the fuel will permeate only ~1
vol % of certain grades of graphite. This degree of permeation occurs, however,
in the absence of radiation and the possible complications imposed by fission--
fragment recoils in the graphite. At this stage there are not enough in-pile data
to warrant complete assurance that greater perméation will not occur in the reactor.
This lack of knowledge has brought about two modifications of design. One of
these is the "increase of fuel fraction within the core from 12% to 22.5%. This in-
crease minimizes the reactivity change associated with soaking of graphite by the
fuel. It has an additional beneficial effect in that it reduces the concentration
of uranium and therefore results in a lower fuel inventory. The only accompanying
adverse effect is an insignificant rise (~30°F) in hot-spot temperature in.the
core.
The second design change involves the addition of poison tubes within the
core. Four l-in.-diam inverted thimbles are now inserted in the core and provide
means for inserting or removing liquid poison in a controlled manner. The tubes
provide ample poison for overriding complete saturation of the graphite by fuel.
The absorption of xenon by the graphite has been studied theoretically and
experimentally; and with the gas permeability of the graphite expected to be used
in the MSRE, it is apparent that the xenon poison level will be 2 to L% Ak/k
The poison tubes can be used to compensate for the decay of xenon after reactor
shutdown. '
A third change in the design, also dictated by the indeterminant status of
the graphite problem, involves a better method of sampling the core graphite during
the course of the experiment. An additional penetration into the top of the re-
actor vessel has been provided. Through this penetration, with a minimum of incon-
venience, a sample of graphite can be removed from the core for study.
It is obvious from these design changes that, in addition to establishing
the safety, dependability and maintainability of the molten-salt reactor system,
a fourth objective has been added to the project. This objective is to establish
the feasibility of unclad graphite as a moderator for the molten-salt reactor.
Except for the changes referred to, the MSRE design proceeded in accordance
with the original plan. Component design, system layout, building-alteration de-
sign, and services provisions progressed satisfactorily. Detailed discussion of
. these design phases follows.
1.2 REACTOR CORE AND VESSEL
A number of significant changes to the reactor core and vessel were made
during the period covered by this report. Briefly they are: the flow rate was
reduced to 1200 gpm, the core inlet volute was changed to a flow distributor, the
fuel volume in the core was increased to 22- L/E%, a poiscn system was added, a
method of sampling graphite near the outer periphery will be added, .a rieutron
shield was incorporated-in the head, and other minor changes were made.
Detail drawings of the reactor were completed and were submitted for review.
Checking of all drawings is in progress.
The reactor receives the fuel salt from the cold end of the fuel heat ex-
changer. Once in the vessel the salt passes down in a l-in.-wide annulus in a
-helical path. The swirl is stopped at the bottom of the vessel, and the fuel
flows upward through the graphite-moderated core, through the holes of the neutron
shield, and finally leaves through a bellmouthed outlet pipe.
. i
The original core design was changed in several respects. These changes were
necessitated by:
additional nuclear information,
results of hydrodynamic data on the 1/5-scale model,
investigation into the behavior of graphite under 1rrad1at10n,
fabrication difficulties of the first design.
W
Significant design data are presented in Table 1.1.
)
Table 1.1. Reactor-Vessel Design Data
Structural material INOR-8
Core vessel
ID 58 in.
Wall thickness 9/16 in.
Design pressure 50 fisi
Design temperature 1300°F
Fuel inlet temperature 1175°F
Fuel outlet temperature 1225°F
Inlet Flow distributor
Annulue ID 56 in.
Annulus OD 58 in.
Over-all height of core tank ~8 ft
Head thickness 1l in.
6-in.-0D tubing, 0.203-in. wall
Tnlet pipe
Outlet pipe 8-in. sched-L0 pipe
Core container
ID 55-1/2 in.
Wall thickness 1/b in.
Length 68 in.
Graphite core
Diameter 55-1/L4 in.
Core blocks (rough cut)
Number of fuel channels
Fuel-channel size
Effective reactor length
2 x 2 x 70 in.
1064
1.2 x 0.400 x 63 in.
~65 in.
Fractional fucl volume 0. 400
Changes in the fuel composition resulting in an increased density and specific
heat made it possible to lower the flow rate to 1200 gpm and obtain the 50°F
desired At.
The fuel volume was increased to 22-1/2% by increasing the width of the chan-
nel to 0.4 in., maintaining the length at 1.2 in., but with semicircular ends.
The reducllon in flow ratée and increased volume lowered the velocity to approxi-
mately 0.72 fps and the Reynolds number to approximately 1200. The flow in the
annulus remgins turbulent, and maintaining the core wall at a reasonable tempera-
ture presents no problem.
The fuel tlow passages will be machined in the four faces of the graphite
stringers, but no cross-communicating channels will be provided. Five molybdenum
bands will cover the middle one-third of the matrix. It is possible that a lfull
cross-sectional break could occur in a graphite stringer. Should this happen,
the upper piece would tend to float upward approximately 3/h in., creating a fuel
pocket 2 x 2 x 3/4 in. This fuel, being relatively .stagnant, might reach a very
high temperature. To prevent this possibility, an INOR rod will be placed hori-
zontally through the upper ends of the graphite blocks, one rod in each row.
The coarse screen at the top will not be used, but a neutron shield will be
placed in the upper head. This shield will be a large INOR-8 casting of circular
shape but varying in thickness from 4-3/k in. near the outer edge to approximately
8-3/4 in. at the center. It is perforated by 1-1/8-in.-diam holes on a 2-in.
square spacing-.
The antiswirl vanes in the lower head extend radially 11 in. toward the center
. from the outer periphery. This reduces the radial pressure difference to approxi-
mately 0.3 in. of fuel salt. The pressure drop across the graphite lattice sup-
porting the stringers is approximately 4.5 in., which, being large in comparison to
the radial pressure difference, assures good flow distribution te the wvertical fuel
channels. '
A poison-tube system (shown in Fig. 1.1) was added for control during startup
and to compensate for xenon poisoning effects. Poisoning will be accomplished by
means of a molten salt composed of Li and BeF,. 1In the reactor the poison salt
will be contained in four l—in.-ODAO.O65-in.-wall tubes, each separately controlled.
The tubes enter the reactor vessel through the lower head on a U4-in. radius and ex-
tend through the graphite stringers to the upper. end where they are capped off.
The section of the tube which passes through the lower head is a 3/4—in. pipe and
joins the 1-in.-0D tube Jjust inside the vessel. OQutside the reactor vessel a
‘ l/2—in. pipe goes to a reservoir located just above the flow distributor, thus
forming a U-tube. A 1/4-in. tube enters the 1-in.-OD tube through an elbow outside
the vessel head and extends to the upper end where it terminates open-ended. Gas
pressure is required to keep the poison out of the reactor, thus providing a fail-
safe condition. :
A penetration will be provided in the top head near the outer periphery for
removing graphite samples without removing the pump. Details of the method of re-
moval have not yet been determined.
_ The fuel inlet volute was replaced by a flow distributor. The distributor is
composed of a perforated section of the vessel wall and a constant-area casing
around the outside of the vessel enclosing these holes. The holes are 3/& in. in
diameter and enter the vessel wall at a 30° angle to the tangent to the outer vessel
syrface. This arrangement provides the swirling flow desirable in the annulus. The
holes have a variable circumferential spacing to provide a more even flow distri-
bution to the annulus. The reactor with these changes is shown in Fig. 1.2.
1.3 FUEL HEAT EXCHANGER
The design of the heat exchanger was revised to compensate for changes in com-
position and properties of the fuel and coolant salts. Revised design data are
shown in Table 1.2.
Drafts of heat transfer and pressure-drop design reports were completed. A
summary of stress calculations was also drafted. Specifications were approved.
According to the specifications the fabricator will be responsible for detail de-
sign and completion of the stress analysis.
5
Table 1.2. Primary-Heat-Exchanger Design Data
Structural material INOR-8
Heat load ) 10 Mw
Shell-side fluid : _ Fuel salt
Tube-side fluid | Coolant salt
Layout ‘ | ’ 25% cut, cross-baffled shell
and U-tubes '
Baffle pitch 12 in.
Tube pitch 0.775 in.
Tube ‘
Outside diameter 0.500 in.
Wall thickness - 0.042 in.
Active shell length 6 ft
Average tube length 14 ft
Number of U-tubes 7 165
Shell diameter 16 in. -
Over-all length ~8 ft fi
Shell thickness 1/2 in.
" Tube-sheet thickness 1-1/2 in.
Design temperature 1300°F
Design pressure
Shell 50 psig
Tube _ 75 psig |
Terminal temperatures ,