-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-3419.txt
7415 lines (5876 loc) · 279 KB
/
ORNL-3419.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
ORNL-3419
UC-80 =Reactor Technology
MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR PROGRAM
SEMIANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
FOR PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 31, 1963
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an
agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States
Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal
liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process
disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately
owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product,
process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or
otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any
agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein
do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States
Government or any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegible In
electronic image products. Images are produced
from the best available original document.
Printed in USA. Price: $2.75 Available from the
Office of Technical Services
U. S. Department of Commerce
Washington 25, D. C.
LEGAL NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work, Neither the United States,
nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission:
A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of
any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe
privately owned rights; or
B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of
any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report.
As used in the above, ‘‘person acting on behalf of the Commission’’ includes any employee or
contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee
or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or
provides access to, any information pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission,
or his employment with such contractor.
Contract No. W-7405-eng-26
MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR PROGRAM
SEMIANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
For Period Ending Januvary 31, 1963
R. B. Brigge, Program Director
Date Isscued
JUR 3 - 1963
OAK RIDGE NATTONAL LABORATORY
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
| for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
ORNL-3419
THIS PAGE
WAS INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
A}
&
iii
SUMMARY
Part 1, MSRE Design, Engineering Analysis,
and Component Development
1. Reactor Analysis
Selective freezing of fuel salt in the drain tanks could permit the
MSRE core to be filled with concentrated fuel and premature criticality
could occur. This situation was studied for the case of fuel containing
no thorium. If the core were filled completely with concentrated fuel,
fluid temperatures in excess of 2500°F could result even if all control
rods were inserted. Insertion of rods near the time the core first be-
came critical would, however, keep the reactor subcritical for a time suf-
ficient to stop the fuel addition; stopping the addition would limit the
fuel temperature rise to less than 25°F.
Estimates were made of coolant salt activation by absorption of de-
layed neutrons for both the normal coolant LiF-BeF, (66-34 mole %) and for
LiF-NaF-KF (46.5-11.5-42 mole %). After 10-Mw operation, the activity of
the normal coolant will be about 2.7 pc/cm® and that of LiF-NaF-KF would
be about 2.5 pc/cm’.
Expressions were obtained relating the reactivity effects of Xel3?
to the reactor conditions and the xenon spatial distribution. For the
MSRE and highly enriched uranium fuel, a reactivity decrease of about
0.6% was associated with an effective xenon poison fraction of 1%.
Calculations were made of the reactivity effects associated with
graphite shrinkage, fuel soakup, and uncertainties in salt and graphite
densities. TFor highly enriched uranium fuel, a 0.34% increase in re-
activity was associated with a 1% increase in average salt density; a 1%
increase in average graphite density increased reactivity by 0.53%. The
increase in average salt density associated with a 1% decrease in graphite
volume as a result of shrinkage caused the reactivity to increase by 1.18%.
2. Component Development
Two INOR-8 freeze-flange joints for 5-in.-diam sched.-40 pipe were
successfully tested, one in the thermal-cycling test loop and the other
in the pump-testing facility. The joint in the thermal-cycling test loop
was thermally cycled a total of 103 times between 100 and 1275°F, at the
bore, with a final helium leak rate of less than 5 X 107° cm?® (STP)/sec
at the lower temperature. The Jjoint tests were completed, but the joint
in the pump-testing facility will be left in place for observation after
extended operating intervals.
An MSRE prototype freeze valve control circuit was installed in the
valve test loop for operational testing, and it performed satisfactorily-
iv
in the control of the transfer valve, which is typical of all MSRE valves,
except the reactor drain valve. The reactor drain valve differs in the
orientation of its flat surface and in the presence of a concentric emer-
gency drain line inside the valve proper. The extra conduction of this
line resulted in a larger temperature difference between the center of
the valve and the surface during the freezing transient, requiring that
the automatic controls be set at a lower temperature than desired. In-
sulation of the thermocouple area is being tried as a solution to this
problem.
The design and fabrication of a prototype control rod drive was sub-
contracted, and work on the drive was started. Two types of flexible con-
trol rods were tested under realistic operating conditionsg. Excessive
wear at the bends of the guide thimble was solved by the installation of
rollers. Exact positioning of the bottom of the rud rewmains a problem.
Two all-metal prototype heaters for 5-in. plpe were received, and
testing was initiated. One heater was in excellent condition after oper-
ating for 2600 hr above 1200°F. The other failed after 1260 hr, probably
because of either abnormally high thermal stress or the presence of a con-
taminant that will not be encountered in the reactor.
The prototype cooling bayonels for removing fuel afterheat from the
MSRE drain tank were thermally shock tested a total of 2257 without fail-
ure. Six of the ten reactor-grade thermocouples were still intact after
this very severe test. :
Fabrication of the sampler-enricher system mockup and installation
into the engineering test loop is nearing completion. Difficulties with
the sealing of the flanged disconnect were traced to shresses produced
during fabrication and were solved by annealing.
Operation of the full-scale MSRE core model with water at 85°F was
continued to make preliminary measurements of the internal flow distribu-
tion and pressure drop through the corc., The difference in flow between
mutually perpendicular channels was reduced by drilling holes in the sup-
port lattice directly under the starved channels. The small radial depend-
ence of flow was deftermined as beneficial in giving more nniform tempera-
ture rise of the fuel. The over-all pressure drop through the MSRE core
model was measured and was found to be essentially independent of the
Reynolds number. -
The engineering test loop was placed into operation after successful
pretreatment of graphite with wvacuum and heat, and after treatment of the
operating salt with H, and HF to remove oxygen. The graphite container
access Jjoint seal was operated in a manner to reduce the heat removed
from the joint.
After 1540 hr of operation, the loop was shut down and graphite sam-
ples were removed for metallurgical examination. Treatment of the salt
in the drain tank with HF indicated the presence of at least two separate
)
phases of oxide. Although some improvements were made in the sampling
technique, the chemical analyses for oxide were not reliable and consist-
ent.
Measurements were made of the permeability of ETL graphite samples
with area-to-length ratios ranging from 69 to 99 cm. The permeability
to helium ranged from 1 X 10-2 to 3 x 10-? cm?/sec.
A procedure for the remote replacement of a freeze flange gasket was
demonstrated. Two men completed the replacement in 8 hr, and it was esti-
mated that the replacement would require an additional 24 hr in the reac-
tor. Additional tools were designed and are being fabricated for the
maintenance of freeze flange FF-100 under its special conditions.
A 1/6-scale model of the reactor cell was constructed for use in
studying maintenance problems.
Operation of the prototype fuel pump in molten salt was resumed, and
the testing program was reinstated. A water test of the fuel pump was
also run to determine the value of the radial force on the impeller for
several pump operating conditions of interest. Endurance testing of the
lubrication pump and the PKP fuel pump with molten salt were continued.
A prototype model of a two-level single-point molten-salt-level probe
has operated successfully for six months. Although the signal-to-noise
ratio obtained is adequate, an effort is being made to reduce the noise
level.
Developmental testing of a continuous liquid-level-indicating ele-
ment for use in measuring the molten salt level in the MSRE pump bowl was
continued. Performance of two units is still satisfactory after one year
of operation at temperatures between 900 and 1300°F. Performance of a
bubbler-type molten-salt-level-indicating system, which simulates a sys-
tem to be installed on the MSRE, has been satisfactory.
A developmental temperature-scanning system was operated satisfacto-
rily for 3000 hr. At the end of this period, the system began generating
excessive noise pulses. The noise was determined to be due to oxidation
of mercury in the lower switch deck.
Negotiations were completed for the procurement of a special high-
temperature, NaK-filled, differential-pressure transmitter.
Thermon X63 was determined to be unsuitable for use as a heat-conduct-
ing bond on the MSRE radiator thermocouple installation. Eight MSRE pro-
totype surface-mounted thermocouples continued to perform satisfactorily
after 3000 hr of operation on the MSRE Experiment Test Loop. Drift of
six similar thermocouples remained at less that *2°F after 8000 hr at
1200 to 1250°F. Five out of ten thermocouples are still functioning
after 2050 severe thermal cycles.
vi
Data obtained from tests of MSRE prototype surface-mounted thermo-
couples on the MSRE pump test loop indicated that the thermocouples are
greatly int'luenced by the heaters. The thermocouples could not be used
for computation of reactor heat power or for precise measurement of the
mean reactor temperature unless the heater power was maintained constant
and a correction was made for bias in the thermocouple reading.
Several sealing and potting compounds were tested for use in seal-
ing the ends of mineral-insulated thermocouples and copper-tube-sheathed
thermocouple extension cable. Excellent seals were obtained with Araldite
epoxy compound and with a glass-to-metal hermetic solder seal. No accept-
able seals were obtained with low-temperature-setting ceramic-base com-
pounds. A compound which requires high-temperature curing is being in-
vestigated for posgsible use in sealing the ends of indivlidual wetal-
sheathed thermocouples.
3. MSRE Design, Procurement, and Installation
No significant changes were made in design concept or in detail of
any component or system. Design work, except for instrumentation, was
essentially completed, and a design report giving all engineering calcu-
lations and analyses of the system is being compiled.
The layout of the instrumentation and control system remains essen-
tially the same as previously reported. Three panels were added, location
of wireways was determined, and containment penetrations were assigned.
Additional instrument application flow diagrams for the chemical pro-
cessing system, the fuel loading and storage system, aud the instrument
air distribution system were completed. ‘Tabulations aud application dia-
grams were revised to incorporatée recent design chauges., -
Preliminary control system block diagrams were prepared, and crileria
for control and safety circuitry are being reviewed. The design of instru-
ment and control system panels 1is approximately 85% complete, and panel
fabrication is 50% complete. The design of lonslrument air interconnec-
tione was completed. Interconnection wiring designs for the annunciator
system and for the Foxboro Electronic Consotrol Instrumentaltion System
are nearing completion. Design work on thermocouple interconnections 1is
under way. Location and attachment drawings for thermocouples in the fuel
and coolant system and a tabulation of the 819 thermocouples in the reac-
tor system were completed.
Fabrication drawings for drain tank salt level probes and for oil
system venturi flow elements were completed. Requirements for process ra-
diation monitors were established, and design work on field installations
for these monitors is in progress. Panel design is nearing completion.
Design work on personnel monitoring installations is under way.
Approximately 90% of the commercially available standard components
for the reactor system instrumentation was received. Approval was ob-
tained for procurement of the data system.
vii
An analog simulation of the reactor fill and drain system indicated
that the use of restrictors in the bypass lines between drain tanks and
the pump bowl would reduce pump bowl pressure transients during a dump
to an acceptable level without an objectionable increase in the time re-
quired to complete a dump.
All modifications to Building 7503, which will house the MSRE, were
completed. TFabrication of the fuel system flush tank, the coolant salt
storage tank, and the steam dome and bayonet tube assemblies for the
drain tank coolant system was completed. Other components are approxi-
mately 85% complete.
Difficulty in the manufacturing of the MSRE graphite was encountered
that will delay delivery until after July 1, 1963. Procurement of miscel-
laneous equipment arnd material for MSRE auxiliary systems is approximately
85% complete.
Part 2. Materials Studies
4. Metallurgy
A full-scale sample heat exchanger was successfully fabricated to
test previously developed welding and brazing procedures. The 52 welded-
and-brazed tube-to-tube sheet joints exhibited good weld soundness and
complete brazes. Ultrasonic inspection techniques for the tube brazes
were correlated with metallographic studies, and a 3/32-in-diam flat-
bottom reference hole was selected as the standard for evaluating braz-
ing of the MSRE heat exchanger. The MSRE heat exchanger core was suc-
cessfully assembled and welded.
Mechanical properties studies of random heats of reactor quality
INOR-8 to be used in the MSRE indicated that these materials have signifi-
cantly better properties than the design values established with the pre-
viously available INOR-8. INOR-8 was approved for code construction by
the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Committee. The allowable
stresses are reported.
The CGB graphite bars produced for the MSRE moderator were found to
meet specifications except that there were cracks and some bars had densi-
ties as low as 1.82 g/cmB. Despite these conditions the graphite was
found to have good mechanical strength and low permeation when exposed
to salt. The salt permeation of cracked CGB graphite was tested at 150
psig and 1300°F and was found to be less than 0.1% of the bulk volume.
Rapid thermal cycling between 390 and 1300°F did not damage the graphite
or cause salt-impregnated cracks to propagate. The tensile strength was
found to range from 5440 to 6500 psi when tested as a round bar or a ring.
The strength of severely cracked specimens was as low as 1500 psi; how-
ever, the material did not demonstrate notch sensitivity.
viii N
Sample control rod elements were tested in the control-rod-testing
rig. They were thermally and mechanically stressed for 600 hr through
approximately 11,000 cycles. The hot-pressed Gdp03-Al,05 cylinders
cracked during this testing but did not crumble, and the metal container
was not distorted.
Cold-pressed and sintered cylinders of Gd,03-A1,0; mixtures contain-
ing 30 wt % Al,0; were prepared by working with prereacted powder that
had 95% of the calculated density. Shrinkage behavior at successive
sintering temperatures caused distortion, apparently because of the for-
mation of intermediate compounds by a peritectic reaction. The use of a
prereacted Gd;03-Al,03 holding fixture was found to resolve the distor- _
tion problem. ] .
5. Radiation Effects : v
The source of the previously encountered F,; in the cover gas of
sealed capsules examined after an exposure of 1070 neutrons/em® wus dis-
covered in recent irradiation experiments. The fluorine was evolv=d from
the frozen fuel at room temperature as a consequence of radiation damage
to the crystals. No evidence of radiation damage to the molten fuel was
found, and the evolution of F, at low temperature appeared to be easily
avoidable without appreciable changes in present plans for MSRE operation.
Examinations of sealed capsules from earlier cxposures were continued.
The results served chiefly to confirm previously reported preliminary
findings and surmises. Analyses of gas samples that were accumulated in
capsules operating at MSRE conditions gave reassuringly negative results
in regard 1.0 the evolution of CF,. Results from all experiments, includ-
ing gas analyses from a varilety ol uperaling conditions, make a strong
case for the presence of CF, only as a secondary consequence of F, pro-
duction. The absence of evidence of unusual loss of [fluorine in any form
from the fissioning fuel at high temperatures was firmly established and
confirmed bhoth thermodynamic predictions and the conclusions from irradia- \
tion tests since the earliest work on molten salt reactors. The post-
exposure evolution of F, from the solids, which even yet has uol always 8
occurred when it might be expected, was generally not identified when-
present in earlier hot cell examinations, presumably because the gas
phase usually escaped and was never analyzed; fluorine was undoubtedly
associlated with an earlier instance of an unidentit'ied smoke that was
noted when loop sections ¢ontaining lrradlaled Luel werc scgmented.
6. Chemistry
-
Continued phase equilibrium studies of MSRE-type fluoride mixtures
showed that in none of the complex solid compounds so far encountered in
the LiF-rich region of the LiF-ZrF,-UF, ternary system does UF, partici-
pate in a solid solution; however, the simple compounds UF, and ZrF, oOr
UF; and UF3 do form solid solutions. The solubility of UF3 in MSRE fuels
was studied and found to be more than adequate.
Revised and lower values for the solubility of oxides in fuel mix-
tures were correlated with recently established solubility products of
7Zr0, and UO,. Saturation limits at as low as 80-ppm oxide for precipi-
tation of Zr0O, were indicated for melts like the MSRE fuel; the scaveng-
ing action of ZrO, in protecting against precipitation of UO, was con-
firmed.
Favorably low vapor pressures for MSRE melts were determined experi-
mentally. The low vapor pressures are in part explained by strong com-
plexing of potentially wvolatile constituents, such as ZrF,, as reflected
by calculated activity coefficients in the system LiF-ZrF,.
Further confirmation was obtained of the adequacy of proposed MSRE
startup procedures for removing moisture from graphite. Physically held
water was driven off near 100°C, and a small burst of more strongly bound
water was evolved near 400°C in a roughly reproducible pattern that was
only slightly altered by changes in the heating rate.
An experimental study of the reaction of CF,; with fuel mixtures re-
duced by the addition of zirconium turnings showed that the CF, reacted
with the reduced fuel at an accelerated rate when admitted to the fuel
through a hollow graphite cylinder immersed in the fuel. The reasons for
this behavior are not yet fully established.
Experimental investigations involving fluorine were facilitated by
the use of a new manifold for regulating and controlling the flow of fluo-
rine gas. For example, XeF, was prepared as required., A facility for
the production of pure UF; was improved.
Four approaches to out-of-pile studies of irradiation-induced evolu-
tion of fluorine from solid fluoride fuels are being investigated. Con-
sideration is bein% given to the use of Van de Graaff electrons, beta
radiation from Sr°°-Y%9, gamma radiation from a Co®® source, and x-rays
from a high-capacity x-ray machine. All these radiation sources are amen-
able to use over extended salt composition and temperature ranges, and
most could be employed on molten salt 1f necessary.
Work continued on the development and evaluation of methods for
analysis of the radioactive MSRE fuel. A hot-cell mockup was used in
most of Llls wurk, dlong with actual high-level-radiation hot cells,
in order to simulate as closely as possible the conditions under which
it will be necessary to analyze highly radiocactive materials, Improved
means of analyzing fuel for oxides were studied.
7. I'uel Processing
Work on the detailed design of a fuel-processing system for the MSRE
was essentially completed. The locations of the equipment were estabw
lished, and the flow sheel was changed to route the exit gas from the
fluorine disposal system through the caustic scrubber.
| THIS PAGE.
WAS INTENTIONALLY
- LEFT BLANK
x1i
CONTENTS
SUMMARY &ttt it ittt ittt i e e e i e e e e iii
PART 1. MSRE DESIGN, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS, AND
COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
REACTOR ANALY SIS + it it ev et nnorcnanasnenessossscoessnsases 3
Analysis of Filling Accident .........ccuiit i innrnerennnns 3
Coolant Salt Activation .......c.eiii it iiin et veoeiononnesans 4
Reactivity Effects of Xel3% it ien s 4
Reactivity Effects of Changes in Salt and
Graphite Densities .......iiviiivn e nnenans P e e e e e 6
COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
Freeze-Flange Joint Development ..........v.cu... e e e e e 10
Thermal-Cycling Test ..ttt ntoteeoerstesostneassonansas 10
Joint Tests in Pump-Testing Facility ....... ... nn 10
'lests of Freeze-Valve Control Circuit ........ccciiiiennan. 12
TransSter Valve i ittt o ittt estneoneenerseeneneeeneasnenas 12
Reactor Drain Valve .....ieiee e enenneeenrosoeraneonanss 14
Reactor Control Rods and Drives ........ . veiivoeereneaeennes 15
Control Rod Drive Prototype ..... ..ot ivivinnrnennneecanass 15
CONErOL ROA t'vvveevnvnoseensennennassennn e 17
Heater Tests v ii it it tni e et ot tovererocasocosenoesenosonoacesss 17
Pipe Heaters with Reflectlve Insulation ..... e e e 17
Drain Tank COOlers .e.eeeeeeeeeas R N T TR 23
Sampler-Enricher System MOCKUD «ovt ittt eenereorooaronoeoeoes 23
Flange DisCONNECtS v vttt it ittt it et et et ee et ennenennseneenens 27
Core DeveloDmMent . vttt ittt ittt ettt te st neneoetnntoeeeanneens 27
Internal Flow Distribution ..o v vt it it it i ineeeesennnees 27
COTE PreSSUTE DIUP v vv e e s tteenneneseenneetonnseeeannss 28
Engineering Test LooP (ETL) «vvvrerrnvennoneeunenneneennnonns 28
Results of the Graphite Pretreatment ..................c... 29
oo} o T 6; oTc ol = v I J 30
Operation of the Graphite Container Access Joint ......... 30
Graphite Sampling Via Removable Dry BOX ...vevevunrrnneens 32
Analysis of Solids Removed from the Graphite
Container ACCESS JOINL .. vt v in it vt nnrnneossnnsesnenns 33
Chemical Analysis and HF Treatment of ETL Flush Salt ..... 33
ETL Graphite Permeability ...... i nnns 35
Xenon Transport in the MORE ... .t ittt treroneereneneenns 35
MSRE Maintenance Development ............ e e ae e e Veeo 35
Maintenance Study Model .....ivieeeernrennn. e e 37
2
Pump Development .......c.cviiiinrencnnes e ettt e e e 37
L
xii
Prototype Pump Operation and Testing .......covvveereennnn 37
PKP Fuel Pump High-Temperature Endurance Test ............ 40
Lubrication-Pump Endurance Test ....ivt i iiiiirnnnnnnnons 40
Instrument Development ..o v vt vt it vt ittt et et bttt et e nsneses 40
' Single-Point Liquid-Level Indicator .........eveeveveneenn. 40
Pump-Bowl Liquid-Level Indicator ..........vuceeenennven.. 41
Bubbler-Type Liquid-Level Indicator .........cvvvvvvneenn. 43
P eMPETratUre SCaNNEY + vt vt ee ettt v e oe tsonvsnennoenenennenns. bdy
High-Temperature NaK-Filled Differential-Pressure
B = T 7 v Y 45
Thermocouple Development and Testing .....covvvevvvennan.. 46
MSRE DESIGN ....... B b e et e e s e e e e s e s e e e e e s e 49
Design Status .....cuvveeunnns N e e 49
REACEOY SYSteM vt vttt it ient tene cnntsnnnnnnnanns e 49
Instrumentalion and CONBIULlE .....vviiiiorannenen.. - uuds 49
Procurement and Installation Status ............. .0 iiunoen, 54
Subcontract Work at Reactor Site ......cveiiiennnnnnann, 54
Fabrication of Major Reactor Components ........ Ceh e - 54
MSRE Cost Estimate Revision ............ R R 62
PART 2. MATERIALS STUDIES
METALIURGY «@vvevverenns e e P 65
Heat Exchanger Fabrication .........iiiie it i nneenenns 65
Sample TUDE BUNGALe 4 v v vt o trse s eroeonenssoonennernenas 65
Tube Joint Inspection ....... S e e ea e et acus s st eerren ‘e 65
MSRE Tube BUndle ....euovveeereernenennneas fe e et d e e 67
Mechanical Properties Of INOR-8 ... vt ittt ie v tnieennsennnness 68
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Allowable
Stresses £Or INOR=8 tivv e it neneieeonsnnensronasonns . 68
Reactor-Quality INOR- 8 ................................ o 68
Evaluation of MSRE Grabhite ...vvrtivenererennnnonnenn. R 70
Salt Permeation of MSRE Graphite .........civuivennnenn 71
. Thermal, Cycling of Salt- Tmpregnated Graphite et e .. 71
Tensile Strength of CGB Graphite ...vveiivreeerer e ennan T4
Nevelopment of Gd;03-A1,0; Control Rod Elements ............. 76
Sample Control Rod Element Testing ... v vt i iine e ninss 76
Sintering Characteristics of Gd;03-A1,05 '
Specimens .............. e et ettt 76
RADTATTION EFFECTS ittt v vt aetr oo seeeoneeennnennneoeanans SR 80
Postirradiation Examination of Experimental
Assembly ORNL-MIR=47=3 .ttt erunvernoeeeneeeneennenneenanns 80
Postirradiation Examination of Experimental o ' o
Assembly ORNL-MIR =47 =4 vttt eneneenneensnensennennisensse 80
xiii
GAS ANBLYSES vttt tratonesaetootoets ot tasersoroesasonaes 80
Metallographic Evaluation of the Wall of a Capsule
from Experimental Assembly ORNL-MTR=47-4 .. ...uiveeeeennn 84
Autoradiography of Unopened CapsSuUles ...oeereenruresvennas 87
Bubble Formation in CapsUles ....v vt vt et veneneneeenos 88
Chemical Analyses of Materials from Experimental
Assembly ORNL-MIR=47 <4 vt nr ittt ettt neeeneeeeenennenns 88
Observations of Sectioned Capsules .........vevivrenunnnss 91
Control Experiments on the Fluorination of Graphite ...... 93
Conclusions Drawn from the ORNL-MIR-47-4 Experiment ...... 93
Molten-Salt Irradiation Experiment ORNL-MIR-47-5 ............ 94
Capsule Irradiation and Sampling ........c.cvt v iveecnnn. 04
Analyses of Gas Samples Taken During Irradiation ......... o7
Pressure Increase During Reactor Shutdown .........cvc0vvn 101
Effects of Flssioning in Frozen Fuel ...........couivnn.. 104
Pressure Rise Following Termination of Exposure .......... 106
Conclusions Drawn from Experiment ORNL-MTR-47-5 .......... 106
CHEMISTRY vt vttt cneennannenesnnsas f e bttt e e 108
Phase Equilibrium Studies ... ..t iri ittt in e inenenennns 108
The System LiF=ZrF =UF, -+ttt ittrtnnneseeennnnenecnnnnns 108
The System UFg-UF, « vttt entnutennnetnnesesenennaeness 108
The System LiF-UF3=UF, ... ittt iirrtnnecnnneenas 109
The System LiF-BeFo-UF3 «itueeu ittt cneneennooneeesesnnns 109
The System LiF-BeFo-ZrF4-UF3 «. ittt iennonreoenens 109
Core and Blanket Fluids for Future Reactors .............. 109
Crystal Structure of Xenon Fluoride ........ i ivinunnn. 110
Oxide Behavior in Mixtures of Flush Salt and Fuel Salt ...... 110
Physical Properties of Molten Fluorides ........coveevenecens 116
Vapor Pressures Of Fluoride MiXtures .......eeeeveeeeennns 116
Densification Of LiF Powder ... v ve ittt tiieoeronerenronnns 117
DENSIEY OF CrF o v v vt evnner it tn s st tanesenssensnsosess 119
Activity Coefficients of ZrF,; in the LiF-ZrF, System ........ 120
Graphite Investigations .......ii it it iiir it neannnnnneeeeens 122
Bvolution ul Volatile Impurities trom Graphite ........... 122
Behavior of Carbon Tetrafluoride in Molten
Fluorides ......oviiiiin.as e e e s e ee e et b e e e e e 127
Production of Purified Materials .........c.ov i ininnrnennss 131
Pure Uranlum Trifluoride .......c.. ittt it einnnnn. 131
Preparation of Xenon Tetrafluoride .......cci i i 131
Fluorine Gas Manifold ... ..t iiinitiennneetnnnnenenens 133
Out-of-Pile Irradiation Studies .....c.cvveiiir i innnnennns 134
Fluorine Evolution from Solid Fluoride Salts Under
Irradiatlon by Van de Graat Electrons ................... 134
Effect of Beta Radiation on Fused Fluorides .............. 135
Gamma Irradiation Experiments with a 10,000-Curie
Cobalt~B0 SOUICE vttt it ittt e te e et eeie st nennnnnnas 135
X=-ray Irradiation of Inorganic TFluorides ,......ecvovveu... 136
Reaction of Fluorine with Reduced Fuel ...........c..c.... 136
7.
Analytical Chemistry
Methods for the Analysis of Radiocactive MSRE Fuel
Analytical Hot-Cell Mockup for MSRE Fuel Analysis
FUEL PROCESSING
Xiv
-----------------------------------------
---------
----------------------------------------------
138
138 .
140
141
PART 1.
MSRE DESIGN, ENGINEERING ANALYSIS, AND
COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
THIS PAGE
WAS INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
1. REACTOR ANALYSIS
Analysis of Filling Accident
The filling accident described previouslyt was reanalyzed2 because
it is presently planned that the first charge of fuel will not contain
thorium. The accident postulated consisted of premature criticality
while the core was being filled with fuel salt containing more than the
design amount of uranium. The increase in the uranium concentration
could result from selective freezing of the salt in the drain tanks. The
accident would be more severe without thorium in the fuel salt because,
if present, it would be concentrated with the uranium and would act as a
neutron poison. :
In the reanalysis it was considered that the fuel contained fully
enriched uranium (0.15 mole % U) and no thorium. With this fuel, it was
found that control rod action alone was not sufficient to prevent a power
excursion for all the cases considered. It would be necessary to stop
filling the core because rod insertion would not always prevent the re-
actor from becoming supercritical and developing excessive temperatures
if the filling were completed.
Even with 39% of the fuel frozen in the dump tanks, the core could
be completely filled with the remaining fluid. If the frozen fraction
contained no uranium and the core were filled with the remaining fluid,
the fuel temperature would exceed 2500°F, even with all control rods in-
serted. Power and temperature transients were therefore predicted, using
an analog computer, to test various corrective actions. The results in-
dicated that if the fill rate were limited to 0.5 cfm, excessive temper-
atures could be prevented if the control rods were inserted and the gas-
control valves were operated at the time the power level reached ~15 Mw.
Inserting the rods limited the fuel temperature rise during the initial
excursion to less than 25°F, and operation of the gas valves stopped the
filling in time to prevent a damaging second power excursion. In an ex-
treme case in which it was assumed that one of the three control rods
failed to drop and two of the three gas control valves failed to operate,
a second excursion resulted from '"coast-up" of the fuel level. In this
case, with an assumed initial fill rate of 0.5 cfm, the fuel temperature
rise at the hottest point was 150°F, and the final temperature was 75°F
above the starting temperature.
1l0ak Ridge National Laboratory, "MSRP Semlann Prog. Rep. Aug. 31,
1962," USAEC Report ORNL-%369, p. 21.
27. R. Engel, P. N. Haubenreich, and S. J. Ball, "Analyeis of
Filling Accidents in MSRE," USAEC Report ORNL-TM-497, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory (in preparation).
Coolant Salt Activation
The activation of the coolant salt by delayed neutrons in the fuel-
to-coolant heat exchanger was estimated using TDC, a multigroup neutron
transport code. Important activities in the normal coolant, that is,
LiF-BeF, (66-34 mole %), were 2.0 pc/cm® from 7.3-s N1€ and 0.7 pc/cm®
from 1128 F2°. If LiF-NaF-KF (46.5-11.5-42 mole %) were used as cool-
ant, the activities would be 1.1 pc/em® from N'€, 0.4 pc/cm® from F=°,
0.7 ue/em® from 15-h Na2%, and 0.3 pc/cm® from 12.4-h K*2,
The present design provides adequate shielding for the radiation
from the coolant system during operation with either coolant. After
shutdown there would be no problem of radiation from the Lil- Bel,, cool-
ant. With LiF-NaF-KF as the coolant, radiation 6 ft from the coolant
drain tank shortly after 10-Mw operation would be only 100 to 200 mr/hr.
Dispersal of coolant through a leak in the radiator would present
a health hazard with either type of coolant. The toxicity of NaF de-
termines the maximum permissible concentration of LiF-NaF-KF in the air,
and the radiocactivity is relatively unimportant. Because of the beryl-
lium, the maximum permissible concentration of the LiF-BeF, in air is
about one tenth that of LiF-NaF-KF,
Reactivity Eifects of Xel®S
The total reactivity loss that will result from Xe'®> poisoning
during high-power operation of the MSRE will depend both on the total
amount and the spatial distribution of xenon in the fuel salt and in
pores in the graphite. The reactivity loss and the poison distribution
can be related theoretically, and the relation is most conveniently ex-
"pressed in terms of a reactivity coefficient and an importance-averaged
xenon concentration.® According to first-order perturbation theory,
the weight function for the poison concentration is proportional to the
product of the thermal flux, ¢_,, and the thermal flux adjoint, ®5 thus
2
jNg N aV+fN LOre_ AV
*
N (1)
Xe ?
£¢2¢2 av
3B. E. Prince, "Methods of Computing the Reactivity Effects of
Distributed Xenon, Graphite Shrinkage, and Fuel Soakup in the MSRE,"
USAEC Report ORNL-TM-496, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (in preparation).
where N is the importance-averaged concentration per unit reactor vol-
ume, ®and Ns are the local concentrations per unit volume of graphite
and sa{%, respectively, and the integral limits g, s, and R refer to
graphite, salt, and reactor, respectively. The quantity N. is also the
uniform equilibrium concentration of xenon that produces thé same re-
activity change as the actual distribution.
In determining the total reactivity loss, a third quantity is often
utilized, the effective thermal poilson fraction, Py.. This is the
number of neutrons absorbed in xenon per neutron absorbed in U235, also
weighted with respect to neutron importance, and is given by
N. [ o e_av
. o-Xe-}(e R 2 2
P, = ) (2)
Crsl o 2 4%
% (21,070, + Z5_0,0,) AV
whexre
Z;;E = macroscopic absorplion cross sectlons of U3 for fast (L)
and thermal neutrons (2), respectively,
OXe = xenon microscopic thermal-neutron absorption cross section.
*
The relation between total xenon reactivity and PXe is given by:
(zl 0 ¢ + X2 o7 ) av
25 2 2 % p
PXe 2 (3)
R
1 =
é(vthbld)l + vthb 0 ) dv
where v is the number of neutrons produced per fission and 1’2 are the
macroscopic fission cross sections for fast (l) and thermal neutrons (2),
respectively. Thus, given knowledge of the xenon distribution, deter-
m%ning*the xenon reactivity involves three steps; namely, calculation of
Nyos P> and &/k from Egqs. (1), (2), and (3), respectively. Alterna-
tively, these relations may be used in the reverse sense in attempting
to infer the distribution from reactivity measurements at power.
The coefficients in the above equations were evaluated for the case
in which the fuel salt contained 0.15 mole % UF4 as highly enriched
uranium. The results were
Sk *
S Sl 0.634 Poe
(L)
*
Pre 4.08 x 10 Ny, s
¥ . . . -
where N is the atoms of xenon per cubic centimeter times 10 =%. The
axial and radial weight functions are plotted in Figs. 1.1 and 1.2.
UNCLASSIFIED
ORNL-LR-DWG 78435
7 - -
— CORE BOUNDARIES -
LT IN
SRR
RELATIVE REACTIVITY IMPORTANCE larkitrary units)
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
‘AXIAL POSITION (in.)
Fig. 1.1. Relative Reactivity Importance of Xenon Concentration
Versus Axial Position.
Reactivity Effects of Changes in Salt and Graphite Densities
Factors that influence the reactivity effects of graphite and salt
density changes are graphite shrinkage, fuel soakup, and uncertainties
in measured values of the densities at design conditionsg. When changes
in the over-all dimensions of the core can be neglected, reactivity
changes with density may be calculated using a reactivity coefficient
and a weighting function that expresses the relative importance oil' the
density change with respect to position.® The latter is useful when the
density changes occur in a nonuniform manner throughout the core. The
calculation is similar to that for determining the temperature coef-
ficient of reactivity;4 in fact, the temperature coefficient is -the sum
#0ak Ridge National Laboratory, "MSRP Semiann. Prog. Rep. Aug. 31,
1962," USAEC Report ORNL-3%369, p. 33.
UNCLASSIFIED
ORNL-LR-DWG 78436
5 LN\
RELATIVE REACTIVITY IMPORTANCE (arbitrary units)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
RADIAL POSITION (in.}
Fig. 1.2. Relative Reactivity Importance of Xenon Concentration
Versus Radial Position.
of the effects of density and thermal spectrum changes. The results of
calculations for fuél salt containing 0.15 mole % UF4 were
N x
ok )
© = 0.343 (5—)
S
(5)
aN _ x
Sk _ 8
k - 0'533 (N ) 2
g
where NS and N_ are the effective homogeneous densities of galt and
graphite, respgctively, per unit rcactor volume, and (SN/N)" _1is the
importance-averaged fractional change in density. The latt8?Cis given
by
8
J Gy (r,2) % av
* R
5s8 J'GN(r,z)dV
R
(29) (6)
where G, is the spatial importance function. The axial and radial weight
functions for fuel ‘and graphite density changes are plotted in Figs. 1.3
and 1..4.
UNGLASSIFIED
ORML~LR=DW} 7R437
| i N
- CORE BOUNDARIES — -
n
(63
(o]
7
\
/
‘!_‘:
o
N
/ \\
GRAPHITE
(’
\
7 N Y FUEL SALT
\
\
\
A n
0 /% by \
-{0 0 0 20 30 40 50 69 70 80
AXIAL POSITION (in.)
o
[$]]
\\\
N
\\
RELATIVE REACTIVITY IMPORTANCE (arbitrary units)
o
N
~
\\
Fig. 1.3. Relative Reactivity Importance of kractional Increases
in Salt and Graphite Densities Versus Axial Position. -
The results given above can be used to calculate the reactivity
effects of uncertainties in the measured densities of the materials at
design conditions. In order to calculate the effects of graphite shrink-
age and fuel soakup, however, some specific situation must be considered.
If shrinkage were uniform in the transverse direction across a graphite
stringer and if the center of the stringer remained fixed during con-
traction, gaps would open between stringers and fill with fuel salt.. The
homogeneous density of the graphite would remain constant; however, the
effective salt density, N, would increase. If \A and v_ represent vol-
ume fractions of salt and graphite in the lattice, the f%actional change
in salt density would be given by BVS = —0v_, and the associated changes
in salt density and reactivity would be
N ov v \'2 v
e—=-£ £ K (7)
N v v v v 1
s S s g S
UNCLASSIFIED
ORNL-LR-DWG 78438
2.5
@
. &
pos | .
> - -
5 2.0 ’,’ \-\
= / N
5 // \\
w o~ / N\
s Y \\pRAPHWE
2 15 <
S \
8 \
2 \
\
- ‘\\\ \
> 10 \
e FUEL SALf\\\\\\ \
3 N
[
w \ \\
> N
% 0.5 N\ _
N
w ‘\ N\
o N\
AN
AN
N
0 \\\k
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
RADIAL POSITION (in.)
Fig. 1.4. Relative Reactivity Importance of Fractional Increases
in Salt and Graphite Densities Versus Radial Position.
and
8k g N *
= = 0.343 < v fl> =1.18 £, (8)
where f_ is the fractional decrease in graphite volume as a result of
shrinkage (a function of position), and the starred quantities are
importance-averaged values of the indicated functions. Equation (8)
also applies to the case of fuel soakup if fl is replaced by f2, the
fraction of the graphite volume filled with salt.
10
2. COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT
Freeze-Flange Joint Development