-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-4191.txt
28056 lines (18171 loc) · 690 KB
/
ORNL-4191.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY RESEARCH LIBRARIES
| qt |
i
i
\ :
;
! 4
[ h
:
i b
:
| R
\ i
‘
i
! 4
| :
B
B
i
"
B
i
iy
4
4
4
v
i
1
3 445k 05155905
ORNL-4191
UC-80 — Reactor Technology
Contract No. W-7405-eng-26
MOL TEN-SALT REACTOR PROGRAM
SEMIANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
For Period Ending August 31, 1967
M. W. Rosenthal, Program Director
R. B. Briggs, Associate Director
P. R. Kasten, Associate Director
DECEMBER 1967
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Osk Ridge, Tennessee
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U. 5. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
TIN ENERGY AESEARGH LIBRARIES
[T
3 4454 0515905 7
i
i
§
i
!
i
'
b
i
This report is one of a series of periodic reports in which we describe briefly the progress of
the program. Other reports issued in this series are listed below. ORNL-3708 is an especially
useful report, because it gives a thorough review of the design and construction and supporting
development work for the MSRE. It also describes much of the general technology for molten-salt
reactor systems,
ORNL.-2474
ORNL.-2626
ORNL-2684
ORNL-2723
ORNL-2799
ORNL-2890
ORNL-2973
ORNL-3014
ORNL-3122
ORNL.-3215
ORNL-3282
ORNL.-3369
ORNL-3419
ORNL-3529
ORNL-3626
ORNL.-3708
ORNL-3812
ORNL-3872
ORNL-3936
ORNL-4037
ORNL-4119
Period Ending January 31, 1958
Period
Period
Period
Period
Ending October 31, 1958
Ending January 31, 1959
Ending April 30, 1959
Frnding July 31, 1959
Period Ending October 31, 1959
Periods Ending Jonuary 31 and April 30,
Period
Period
Period
Period
Period
Period
Period
Ending July 31, 1960
Ending February 28, 1961
Ending August 31, 1961
Ending February 28, 1962
Ending August 31, 1962
Ending January 31, 1963
Ending July 31, 1963
Period Ending January 31, 1964
Period
Period
Period
Period
Period
Period
Ending July 31, 1964
Ending February 28, 1965
Ending August 31, 1965
Ending February 28, 1966
Ending August 31, 1966
Ending February 28, 1967
1960
Contents
TN R O DU T N et e ettt et e s s e e be e bt et e oo s e e e oo e e ea e et e e e ae e et s 1
Sl M M A R Y oottt et ettt et et 2ttt nE o e e A A< e et et s e e e e e e e e e e e ae s e e et e e e e e a e e e e nen e e 3
PART 1. MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR EXPERIMENT
L. MO RE O E R A T IO S o oo e oo oo e oo oo e e e et 4 e e e ea et s es et 4o e n s £ bbb e 1t e e aeae e e 13
1.1 Chronological Account of Operations and Maintenance ...l e 13
1.2 Reactivity BalanCe ... 19
Balance s At P oWt e e 19
Balances at Zeto PowWer e 21
1.3 Thermal Effects of Operation ... ..ot et 22
Radiation Heating . oot ettt e e e e e ettt e e ettt e e e e 22
Thermal Cycle HISTOIY .o e et e e 22
Temperature MeaSurement. ... .. .o e e e 22
Fuel Salt Afterheat e e 24
1.4 Equipment PerformamOe et e et e e e 25
Heat T rans er o e e 25
MR B O OIS i ittt et e ettt et et e e 26
Radiator EnC oS Ure e e e e e e 26
O GaS Sy S MS i i e ettt e ettt a e 27
Cooling Water SySteMS ..o ettt et e e e 29
Component Cooling SyStRIM ... e e e e n e 29
Salt Pump O11 SySTemMS oo i e e e e e 30
Electrical System............... e e e e 31
HEATOIS ittt et e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e et e e et e e e e et e ea e 31
Control Rods and Drives ... e 31
Salt Samplers ... et ee et Meeeeeeeteiessueseteeetateessatetenehe et eeentn Lt et bt s e e st e e .31
oM A It L. i ettt et 33
2. COMPONENT DEVE L O PMEN T e et e et ettt 36
2.1 Off-Gas SamM P T e e 36
2.2 Remote Maint@nanee ... e e e 36
Preparations for Shutdown After Run 11, 36
Evaluation of Remote Maintenance After Run 11 e 37
Repair of Sampler-Enricher and Recovery of Latch ..., 37
2.3 Decontamination SIS . o e e e 40
111
2.4 Development of a Scanning Device for Measuring the Radiation I.evel of
2.5
3. INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROLS
Remote Sources
Experiment with a S-curie '37Cs Gamma SOUICE ..ot
Gamma Scan of the MSRE Heat Exchanger .. ...
Gamma Energy Spectrum Scan of the MSRE Heat Exchanger.............................................
BT DS L
Mark-2 Fuel Pump ...l UUTTI e
Spare Rotaty Elements for MSRE Fuel and Coolant Salt Pumps
Stress Tests of Pump Tank Discharge Nozzle Attachment
MSRE Oil PUMPS o U
0il Pump Endurance Test
3.1 MSRE Operating ERPeriCnCe ... e e
Control System Components ........................oco. e
N AT I S T I O S oo e e e e
Safety SyStem .
3.2 Contiol System Design ...
4. MSRE REACT OR AN ALY SIS e e
B It oAU O IO o e
4.2 Neutron Energy Spectra in MSRE and MSBR ... .
4.3 Other Neutronic Characteristics of MSRE with 233U Fuel .. o
4.4 MSRE Dynamics with 233U Fuel
5. DESIGN
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
6. REACTOR PHYSICS
6.1
Critical Loading, Rod Worth, and Reactivity Coefficients ...
Fission Rate and Thermal Flux Spatial Distributions ... ...
Reactor-Average Fluxes and Reaction Cross Sections
Effect of Circulation on Delayed-Neutron PrecurSors ...
Samarium Poisoning Effeets ...
Cell Arrangement
Reactor
Fuel Heat Exchanger
Blanket Heat Exchanger
Fuel Drain Tanks
MSBR Physics Analysis
Optimization of Reactor Parameters
Useful Life of Moderator Graphite
Flux Flattening
Temperature Coefficients of Reactivity
PART 2. MSBR DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
..................................................................................................
41
43
43
45
45
45
46
46
46
47
47
47
47
48
48
50
50
50
54
54
55
55
58
60
61
63
63
71
76
79
79
81
82
82
82
84
37
7. SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS DEVELOPMENT ... oo e 90
7.1 Noble-Gas Behavior in the MSBR .. e 90
7.2 MSBR Fuel Cell Operation with Molten Salt ...t e 95
7.3 Sodium Fluoroborate Circulating Loop Test ... e et e e e 95
T4 MSBR PUIIDS oottt cie et ettt ee e et e ettt et e et e e e ettt e er et s s et e e et e s en e s e e e 96
Survey of Pump Experience Circulating Liquid Metals and Molten Salts ... 96
Introduction of MSBR Pump Program. ... ..ot e et e e 96
Fuel and Blanket Salt Pumps oo ettt et ee e e e ens 97
Coolant Salt PUMDPS ..ot e ettt et e e et £t ane s 99
Water Pump Test Facility . ... e 99
Molten-Salt Bearing TeSES ..ottt s s ra e e e e e e eeneae s s 100
Rotor-Dynamics Feasibility Investigation ... 100
Other Molten-5alt PUIPS ... ettt et s e ae s st et e e oo e ers e e e e e e e st ee s e s mnmeeiaee e s 101
PART 3. CHEMISTRY
8. CHEMISTRY OF THE MORE L. ittt e e s e ee e et s e aene e e ce e crien e 102
8.1 MSRE Salt Composition and PUrity .. ...t e ee e e e 102
L GBIt i e et e e b e e et e et aenene e 103
Co01ant Sall Lo e e e e e e taa e e e e e e e et e en e naaae o 103
ISR Sat oo et ettt ba ettt e 2 e st et nnae e enea 103
Implications of Current Experience in Future Operations ... .. 108
8.2 MSRE Fuel Circuit Corrosion ChemiStry ...ttt 110
8.3 Adjustment of the UF, Concentration of the Fuel Salt ... 110
9. FISSION PRODUCT BEHAVIOR IN THE MSRE ... s 116
9.1 Fission Products in MSRE Cover Gas .. ... 116
9.2 Fission Products in MSRE Fuel ..o e 119
9.3 Examination of MSRE Surveillance Specimens After 24,000 Mwhr ... 121
Examination of Graphite ... e 121
Examination of Hastelloy N ..o e e s 124
Fission Product Distribution in MSRE . et e 125
9.4 Deposition of Fission Products from MSRE Gas Stream on Metal Specimens................. 128
9.5 Deposition of Fission Products on Graphites in MSRE Pump Bowl ... 131
10. STUDIES WITH LiF-BeF , MELTS ..o 136
10.1 Oxide Chemistry of ThFd—UF‘4 MBS et e e et e 136
10.2 Containment of Molten Fluorides in SiliCaA. ...t st e 137
CREMIESEIY .ottt ettt e e et e s e e s ek et 137
Spectrophotometric Measurements with Silica Cells ... 139
10.3 Electrical Conductivity of Molten Fluorides and Fluoroborates ... 140
11. BEHAVIOR OF MOLYBDENUM FLUORIDES ... ... e 142
11.1 Synthesis of Molybdenum Fluorides ... 142
11.2 Reaction of Molybdenum Fluorides with Molten LiF-BeF , Mixtures ... 143
11.3 Mass Spectrometry of Molybdenum Fluorides ... 144
vi
12. SEPARATION OF FISSION PRODUCTS AND OF PROTACTINIUM FROM
MOLTEN FLUORIDES
12.1 Extraction of Protactinium from Molten Fluorides into Molten Metals... ... ... . . .
12.2 Stability of Protactinium-Bismuth Solutions Contained in Graphite
12.3 Attempted Electrolytic Deposition of Protactinium
12.4 Protactinium Studies in the High-Alpha Molten-Salt Laboratory
Reduction of Iron Dissolved in Molten LikF'- ThF
Thorium Reduction in the Presence of an Iron Surface (Brillo Process)
Thorium Reduction Followed by Filtration
Conclusion
12.5 MSBR Fuel Reprocessing by Reductive Extraction into Molten Bismuth .............................
12.6 Reductive Extraction of Cerium from LiF-BeF, (66-34 Mole %) into Pb-Bi
Eutectic Mixture
13. BEMNAVIOR OF BF, AND FLUOROBORATE MIXTURES
13.1 Phase Relations in Fluoroborate Systems
13.2 Dissociation Vapor Pressures in the NaBF -Nal" System
13.3 Reactions of Fluoroborates with Chromium and Other Hastelloy N Constituents ...
Apparent Mass Transfer of Nickel
13.4 Reaction of BF3 with Chromium Metal at 6507 C e e e,
13.5 Compatibility of BF with Gulfspin-35 Pump Oil at 150°F
14. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR
MOL TEN-SALT REAC T ORS e e e
14.1 Determination of Oxide in MSRE Salts ...
14.2 Determination of U3* in Radioactive Fuel by a Hydrogen Reduction Method ........................
14.3 In-Line Test Facility . ..., U OPR P
14.4 Electroreduction of Uranium(IV) in Molten LiF-Bel' -ZrF, at Fast Scan Rates
and Short TransSition TImMES Lo e e e e e e e bt nan e
14.5 Spectrophotometric Studies of Molten Fluoride Salts ...
14.6 Analysis of Off-Gas from Compatibility Tests of MSRE Pump Oil with BF , ...
14.7 Development of a Gas Chromatograph for the MSRE Blanket Gas ...
PART 4. MOLTEN-SALT IRRADIATION EXPERIMENTS
15. MOLTEN-SALT CONVECTION LOOP IN THE ORR ... e
15.1 Loop Description .. ... BT ST ST T U OO UP PP PRSPPI
15, O PEIA IO oo oo e
15.3 Operating TemMPEIALUIES .......cooiitiiiiiiie it e et e e e et
15.4 Salt Circulation by ConveTtIon i e e aeieee et e e e s s s a s a2 aaaassareree e aenaeans
15.5 Nuclear Heat, Neutron Flux, and Salt Power Density ...
LS. OTTOSIOM . oo
148
167
16.
17.
18.
19,
vii
15.7 Oxygen AnalySiS oo e 182
15.8 Crack in the Core Qutlet Pipe ... e e e 182
15.9 Cutup of Loop and Preparation of Samples ... 184
15.10 Metallographic EXaminalion .. ..o ik e 185
15.11 Isotope Activity Calculation from Flux and Inventory History ... 187
15.12 Isotope Activity BalanCe ... s 190
15.13 Uranium-235 Observed in Graphite Samples.. .. 190
15.14 Penetration of Fission Products into Graphite and Deposition onto Surfaces ... 192
15.15 Gamma Irradiation of Fuel Salt in the Solid Phase ... e 193
PART 5. MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT
MSRE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM L ottt s e e en e e e e e e samn e 196
16.1 General Description of the Surveillance Facility and Observations on
Samples Removed ................oein e eeeeaseiutetete e e et eeaaaeante e e et ee 196
16.2 Mechanical Properties of the MSRE Hastelloy N Surveillance Specimens ... 200
GRA P H I TE ST U S et e et e e et e e e et eh et e ee it e bt ee e s et e e s an e eamsearneeaeeeean 208
17.1 Materials Procurement and Property Evaluation ... 208
17.2 Graphite Surface Sealing with MetalS ...t 211
17.3 Gas Impregnation of MSBR Graphites ... e 212
17.4 Trradiation of Graplit@ .. ... ettt 215
HA S T E L LY N ST U S . ittt e et e e ettt e s er e e e e 2 et eab ot e e et a2 etenesebre s s e baeaesaneenns 217
18.1 Improving the Resistance of Hastelloy N to Radiation Damage by
Composition MOifiC@tIONS . . oo ittt et e et e et et et ae e e e e s eearasaeneaeeeranees 217
18.2 Aging Studies on Titanium-Modified Hastelloy N ... ..ot et 217
18.3 Phase Identification Studies in Hastelloy N . e ee e eee e ne s 2195
18.4 Hot-Ductility Studies of Zirconium-Bearing Modified Hastelloy N...........ooinn . 221
18.5 Residual Stress Measurements in Hastelloy N WeldsS..........ooo e 223
18.6 COrtOSION SEUAIES ..o oottt e et et e et 226
FE] SLES it ittt e e ettt e e s et e e e n s e e e 226
00 Mt SaIES it ee e e et et e et e et eaeet s ettt e e e et e eataeeae e etan e e e aee e e nnenne 227
Equipment Modifications ... e e e e nans 230
18.7 Titanium Diffusion in Hastelloy N .. e e 230
18.8 Hastelloy N—Tellurium Compatibility ... e 233
GRAPHITE-TO-METAL JOINING oottt et s e e oo 236
19.1 Brazing of Graphite to Hastelloy N et e 236
JOIOE DIESIEIL ..ot et ettt e e e a e e e e st 236
Brazing Development. . ... e et et e e e e, 237
19.2 Compatibility of Graphite-Molybdenum Brazed Joints with Molten Fluoride Salts............... 237
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
viil
PART 6. MOLTEN-SALT PROCESSING AND PREPARATION
VAPOR-LIQUID EQUILIRRIUM DATA IN MOLTEN-SALT MIXTURES . 239
RELATIVE VOLATILITY MEASUREMENT BY THE TRANSPIRATION METHOD . _..................... 242
DISTILILATION OF MSRE FUEL CARRIER SAL T o e 243
STEADY-STATE FISSION PRODUCT CONCENTRATIONS AND HEAT GENERATION
IN AN MSBR AND PROCE SSING P L AN o e e e e e 245
Heat Generation in a Molten-Salt Still ... TR 247
REDUCTIVE EXTRACTION OF RARE EARTHS FROM FUEL SAL T o 248
MODIFICATIONS TO MSRE FUEL PROCESSING FACILITY FOR SHORT DECAY CYCLE ......... 251
PREPARATION OF 233UF4.7L1F FUEL CONCENTRATE FOR THE MSRE .. ... 252
IO G oo 252
Equipment and Operatlons ... e 252
Introduction
The objective of the Molten-Salt Reactor Program
is the development of nuclear reactors which use
fluid fuels that are solutions of fissile and fertile
materials in suitable carrier salts. The program is
an outgrowth of the effort begun 17 years ago in
the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program to
make a molten-salt reactor power plant for aircraft.
A molten-salf reactor — the Aircraft Reactor Ex-
periment ~ was operated at ORNL in 1954 as part
of the ANP program.
Our major goal now is to achieve a thermal
breeder reactor that will produce power at low cost
while simultaneously conserving and extending the
nation’s fuel resources. Fuel for this type of re-
actor would be ?33UF, or 235UrF'4 dissolved in a
salt of composition near 2LiF-BeF . The blanket
would be ThF4 dissolved in a carcrier of similar
composition. The technology being developed for
the breeder is also applicable to advanced con-
verter reactors.
Our major effort at present is being applied to
the operation of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experi-
ment {MSRE). This reactor was built to test the
types of fuels and materials that would be used in
thermal breeder and converter reactors and to pro-
vide experience with the operation and maintenance
of a molten-salt reactor. The experiment is demon-
strating on a small scale the attractive features
and the technical feasibility of these systems for
large civilian power reactors. The MSRE operates
at 1200°F and at atmospheric pressure and pro-
duces about 7.5 Mw of heat. Initially, the fuel
contains 0.9 mole % UF4, 5 mole % ZrF ,, 29 mole
% Ber, and 65 mole % LiF, and the uranium is
about 33% ?3°U. The melting point is 840°F. In
later operation we expect to use ?3°U in the lower
concentration typical of the fuel for a breeder.
The fuel circulates through a reactor vessel and
an external pump and heat exchange system. All
this equipment is constructed of Hastelloy N, a
nickel-molybdenum-chromium alloy with exceptional
resistance to corrosion by molten fluorides and
with high strength at high temperature. The re-
actor core contains an assembly of graphite moder-
ator bars that are in direct contact with the fuel.
The graphite is new material of high density and
small pore size. The fuel salt does not wet the
graphite and therefore does not enter the pores,
even at pressures well above the operating pres-
sure.
Heat produced in the reactor is transferred to a
coolant salt in the heat exchanger, and the coolant
salt is pumped through a radiator to dissipate the
heat to the atmosphere. A small facility installed
in the MSRE building will be used for processing
the fuel by treatment with gaseous HF and F,.
Design of the MSRE started early in the summer
of 1960, and fabrication of equipment began early
in 1962. The essential installations were com-
pleted and prenuclear testing was begun in August
of 1964. Following prenuclear testing and some
modifications, the reactor was taken critical on
June 1, 1965, and zero-power experiments were
completed early in July. After additional modifi-
cations, maintenance, and sealing of the contain-
ment, operation at a power of 1 Mw began in
January 1966.
At the 1-Mw power level, trouble was experi-
enced with plugging of small ports in control
valves in the off-gas system by heavy liquid and
varnish-like organic materials. These materials
are believed to be produced from a very small
amount of oil that leaks through a gasketed seal
and into the salt in the tank of the fuel circulating
pump. The oil vaporizes and accompanies the
gaseous fission products and helium cover gas
purge into the off-gas system. There the intense
beta radiation from the krypton and xenon poly-
merizes some of the hydrocarbons, and the products
plug small openings. This difficulty was largely
overcoimie by installing a specially designed filter
in the off-gas line.
Full power — about 7.5 Mw — was reached in
May. The plant was operated until the middle of
July to the eguivalent of about six weeks at full
power, when one of the radiator cooling bloweis —
which were left over {rom the ANP program — broke
up from mechanical stress. While new blowers
were being procured, an airay of graphite and metal
surveillance specimens was taken from the core
and examined.
Power operation was resumed in October with
one blower; then in November the second blower
was installed, and full power was again attained.
After a shutdown to remove salt that had acciden-
tally gotten into an off-gas line, the MSRE was
operated in December and January at full power for
30 days without interruption. A fourth power run
was begun later in January and was continued for
102 days until terminated to remove a second set
of graphite and metal specimens. The end of that
run came almost a year after full power was first
attained. In spite of the time required to replace
the blowers, the load factor for that year was 50%.
An additional operating period of 46 days during
the summer was interrupted for maintenance work
on the sampler-enricher when the cable drive mech-
anism jammed.
The reactor has performed very well in most re-
spects: the fuel has been completely stable, the
fuel and coolant salts have not corroded the Has-
telloy N container material, and there has been no
detectable reaction between the fuel salt and the
graphite in the core of the reactor. Mechanical
difficulties with equipment have been largely con-
fined to peripheral systems and auxiliaries. Ex-
cept for the small leakage of oil into the pump
bowl, the salt pumps have run flawlessly for over
14,000 hr. The reactor has been refueled twice,
both times while operating at full power.
Because the MSRE is of a new and advanced
type, substantial research and development effort
is provided in support of the operation. Included
are engineering development and testing of reactor
components and systems, metallurgical develop-
ment of materials, and studies of the chemistry of
the salts and their compatibility with graphite and
metals both in-pile and out-of-pile.
Conceptial design studies and evaluations are
being made of large power breeder reactors that
use the molten-salt technology. An increasing
amount of research and development is being di-
rected specifically to the requirements of two-
region breeders, including work on materials, on
the chemistry of fuel and blanket salts, and on
processing methods.
Summary
PART 1. MOLTEN-SALT REACTOR
EXPERIMENT ’
1. MSRE Operations
There were two long runs at full power during this
report period. The first, run 11, began in January
and lasted into May. After 102 consecutive days
of nuclear operation {over 90% of the time at full
power), the reactor was shut down to retrieve and
replace part of the graphite and metal specimens
in the core. The six-week shutdown also included
scheduled maintenance and annual tests of con-
tainment, instruments, and controls. Run 12 in-
cluded 42 days in which the reactor was at full
power continuously except for two brief periods
after spurious scrams. The run ended when the
fuel sampler-enricher drive mechanism jammed,
making it inoperative. The reactor was then shut
down, the drive was removed, and the sampler
latch, which had accidentally been severed from
the cable, was retrieved from the fuel pump bowl.
During the long runs at high power, interest
focused primarily on reactivity behavior and on
fuel chemistry. Slow changes in reactivity due to
fission product ingrowth and uranium burnup fol-
lowed expectations, and no anomalous effect was
observed outside the very narrow limits of pre-
cision of measurement (£0.02% 5k/k). Over 2 kg
of #3°U was added to the fuel during full-power
operation. The operation, using the sampler-
enricher, demonstrated quick but smooth melting
and mixing into the circulating fuel. Six additions
of beryllium metal were made to the fuel during
operation to maintain reducing conditions in the
salt. Corrosion in the salt systems was practically
nil, as evidenced by chromium analyses and exami-
nation of the core specimens. Studies of the be-
havior of certain fission products continued.
Component performance, on the whole, was very
good. There was no deterioration of heat transfer
capability or evidence of unusual heat generation
in the reactor vessel. Six thermocouples in the
reactor cell began giving anomalous readings during
mn 11, but all other themocouples showed no
tendency to become less accurate. The new off-
gas filter showed no increase in pressure drop and
apparently remained quite efficient. Restrictions
that built up slowly at the main charcoal bed in-
lets were effectively cleared by the use of built-in
heaters. While the reactor was down in May for
sample removal, two conditions that had existed
for some time were remedied: an inoperative posi-
tion indicator on a control rod drive and a leaking
space cooler in the reactor cell were replaced.
Until the sampler failure at the end of run 12, the
only delays in the experimental program due to
equipment difficulties were brief ones caused by
the main blowers and a component cooling pump.
A main blower bearing was replaced in run 11, and
shortly after the start of run 12 a main blower
motor mount was stiffened to alleviate a resonance
condition. Also at the start of run 12, low oil
pressure made a component coolant pump inopera-
tive until the relief valve was replaced. Secondary
containment leakape remained well within pre-
scribed limits, and there was no leakage from pri-
mary systems during operation. During the six-
month period, the reactor was critical 2925 hr
(66% of the time), and the integrated power in-
creased by 2597 to a total of 5557 equivalent full-
power hours.
2. Component Development
Extensive preparations were made for remote
maintenance in the May-June shutdown, including
training of 30 craftsmen and foremen. Work pro-
ceeded during the shutdown on two shifts. Pro-
cedures and tools prepared in advance worked well
in replacing cote specimens, repairing a control-rod
drive, replacing a reactor cell space cooler, and
inspecting equipment in the reactor cell.
When the sampler became inoperative, prepara-
tions were first made for shielding and containment
during replacement of the mechanism and retrieval
of the latch. The mechanism was then removed,
and a maintenance shield was set up for the latch
retrieval. Various long, flexible tools were de-
signed and tested in a mockup before use in the
sampler tube. The latch was grasped readily, but
difficulties were encountered in bringing it up until
a tool was designed that enclosed the upper end of
the latch. Tools removed from the sampler tube
were heavily contaminated, and a shielded carrier
with disposable liner was devised to handle them.
The sample capsule had broken loose from the
latch and cable and was left in the pump bowl after
an effort to retrieve it with a magnet failed. The
sampler repair and capsule retrieval were accom-
plished without spread of contamination and with
very moderate radiation exposures.
A sampler manipulator was successfully decon-
taminated for reuse in a test of decontamination
methods.
A scheme for mapping and identifying fission
product sources remotely was tested in the reactor
cell during the May shutdown. A lead-tube colli-
mator and an ionization chamber mounted in the
movable maintenance shield were vsed to map
gamma-ray sources in the heat exchanger and ad-
jacent piping; then a collimator and a gamma energy
spectrometer were used to characterize the souice
at various points. Results were promising.
Installation of the off-gas sampler was delayed
when the valve manifold had to be rebuilt because
of imperfect Monel—stainless steel welds.
Stress tests on a Mark-1 pump tank nozzle were
completed. Results compared favorably with cal-
culated stresses, and the design was judged ade-
quate. The Mark-2 replacement fuel pump tank for
the MSRE was completed, and preparations for a
test with salt proceeded.
Oil pumps removed from the MSRE were repaired
and tested. A replacement rotary clement for the
coolant salt pump was modified by seal welding a
mechanical seal that might have become a path for
oil leakage to the pump bowl.
3. Instruments and Controls
During the May shutdown a complete functional
check of instrumentation and control systems was
made. Preventive maintenance at that time included
modifying 139 relays and replacing capacitors in
33 electronic control modules. The type of com-
ponent failures that occurred did not compromise
safety or cause excessive inconvenience. Four of
the eight neutron chambers were replaced, one
because of a short and three because of moisture
inleakage.
Separate power supplies were installed for each
safety channel tc improve continuity of operation
and preclude a single compromising failure.
Various other modifications to circnits or com-
ponents were made to provide more infomation, to
improve performance, or to increase protection.
4. MSRE Reactor Analysis
As part of planning for future operation of the
MSRE, computational studies were made of the
neutronic properties of the reactor with 233U in
the fuel salt instead of the present %3°U (33%
enriched). The neutron energy spectrum was coni-
puted and compared in detail with that for a core-
lattice design being considered for a molten-salt
breeder reactor. The strong similarities indicate
that the results of the MSRE experiment will be
useful in evaluating design methods for the MSBR.
Other computations were made, with the following
results. The critical loading will be 33 kg of 233U,
compared with 70 kg of 2*°U in the first critical
experiment. Control rod worth will be higher by
a factor of about 1.3. The important reactivity
coefficients will also be considerably larger than
with 2°°U fuel. The themmal-neutron flux will be
up by more than a factor of 2, and the steady-state
samarivm concentmations will consequently be
Since more samarium will be left in the salt
from 23°U operation, it will act at first as a burn-
able poison, causing the reactivity to rise for
several weeks despite 233U burmup. Fission power
densities and importance functions will be similar
to those for 235U fuel. The effective delayed-
neutron fraction in the static system will be 0.0026,
decreasing to 0.0017 when fuel circulation starts.
(Corresponding fractions for 23°U are 0.0067 and
0.0046.)
The dynamic behavior with 233U was also ana-
lyzed from the standpoint of the inherent stability
of the system. Because of the small delayed-
neutron fraction, the neutron level responds more
sensitively to changes in reactivity, but the re-
lower.
sponse of the total system is such that the maigins
of inherent stability are greater with 233U fuel.
PART 2. MSBR DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
5. Design
The conceptual design wotk on molten-salt
breeder reactors during the past six months has
been concemed largely with a general advance in
the design of cells, containment, piping, and com-
ponents, and with stress analysis. In addition,
major effort has been devoted to preparation and
evaluation of a reactor design in which the average
core power density is reduced to 20 kw/liter from
the 40 kw/liter we were using during the previous
reporting period. At this lower power density the
core life before replacement is required would be
adequate even if the graphite behavior under irra-
diation is no better than that which has been
achieved to date. The performance at the lower
power density is more nearly representative of
current technology, and better perforimance should
be achievable as better graphite is developed.
Going from 40 to 20 kw/liter increases the capital
cost by $6/kwhr (electrical). No new design work
was performed on the steam system, but all salt
systems (fuel, blanket, and coolant) have been in-
vestigated more thoroughly than has been done
heretofore. Afterheat removal and thermal shield
cooling have been evaluated.
6. Reactor Physics
Parametric studies have been carried out which
reveal the dependence of MSBR performance on
such key design features as the average core power
density. They indicate that the power density may
be reduced from 80 w/cm? to 20 w/em?® with a
penalty not greater than 2%/year in annual fuel
yield or 0.1 mill/kwhr (electrical} in power cost.
At 20 w/cm? the life of the graphite will be in
excess of ten years.
Studies of power flattening in the MSBR core
show that a maximum-to-average power density
ratio of 2 or less can be achieved with no loss of
performance.
Calculations of tempetaiure ceefficients of re-
activity show that the lamge negative component
due to fuel expansion is dominant, and yield an
overall temperature coefficient of —4.3 x 107 %/°C.
7. Systems and Components Development
An analytical model was developed to compute
the steady-state migration of noble gases to the
graphite and other sinks in the MSBR. Work done
to date indicates that the mass tmansfer coefficient
from the circulating salt to the graphite is more
important than the diffusion ceefficient of xenon in
graphite in minimizing the poisoning due to xenon