-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-CF-56-10-110.txt
748 lines (460 loc) · 16.1 KB
/
ORNL-CF-56-10-110.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
X-828
DATE:
SUBJECT:
T0O:
FROM:
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
| Operated By
UNION CARBIDE NUCLEAR COMPANY
WO' S i | - | ()l(l“*l. |
DAk oo, TENEAGES | CENTRAL FILES NUMBER
' O6C-10- 1
October 29, 1956 - This document consists of 9 pages.
FUSED SALT POWER REACTOR STUD
Minutes of Discussion Meeting No. 3
Distribution |
L. G. Alexander and J. T. Roberts
Copy /? of 22 copies. Series A
For Internal Use Only
Distribution
L. G. Alexander
E. 5. Bettis
D. 8. Billington
D. A. Carrison
R. A, Charpie
5. Jo. Cromer
W. K. Ergen
W. R. Grimes
W. H. Jordan
e
© G
0
° o
©
i ) l@ ° B o Wo KinyQI@. - | | . fr‘wmm
11. H. G. Ma@hermn | R ;
12 o W Q o . &m&;@‘ m;g
b, Ro'
L. A. Ma |
H. F, Popp@ndi@k
J. T. Roberts
J. A. Swartout
F. C. VonderLage
A, M. Welnberg
Laboratory Records
- C. R, Library
. This documem contains Restncfed D atg..qn
Energy Act of 1954, Its. transmltW%e dlsclosure of its contents
in any manner to an unoutg’gg person is prohlblted
,,-’_ Q&%‘Sfifi
T~
FUSED SALT POWER REACTOR STUD
Minutes of Discussion.meetingzm@013
October 18, 1956
Present: L. G. Alexander H. G. MacPherson
5. Bettis E. R Mann
A. Carrison J. T. Roberts
J. Cromer | J. A, Swartout
K. Ergen F. C. VonderLage
W. R. Grimes A. M. Weinberg
G. Wo Keilholtz
H. G. MacPherson opened the meeting with a summary of the discussion at the
previous meeting.
L. G. Alexander presented the result @f his UNIVAC calculations using the
Eyewash code.
Eleven reactor cases were studied. The reactors were spherical, the total
power was 600 mw, and the fuel consisted of a nearly equi-molal mixture of
NaF and ZrF), , together with additions of up to 10 mol percent ThF) and suffi-
cient UF) to make the assembly critical. Specific heat release rates of
50, 100 and 200 watts/cc were used, to which core radii of 56, 44 and 35
inches correspond. The cores were bounded variously by l=-inch Ni alloy shells,
reflectors of graphite and NaZfF5g and a blanket containing ThF}.
‘In the first five reactor cases, the core had a radius of 56 inches and was
bounded by a l-inch shell of Ni alloy. The ThF) concentration was varied from
zero to 10 mol percent. The results, in terms of breeding ratio and critical
mass, are summarized in Table I and illustrated in Figure 1. It is seen that
substantial breeding ratios can be obtained at the cost of considerable fuel
inventory,; e.g., to obtain a breeding ratio of 0.75 requires a critical mass
of about 250 kg of U-233. From these data, the optimum combination "of breed-
ing ratio and fuel inventory may be selected.as soon as processmng costs and
1nvent@ry interest rates have been established.
The leakage from these cores is substantial, varying from 23 percent for the
reactor containing no thorium, down to an estimated 12 percent for that con-
taining 10 mol percent ThF). This leakage could be reduced by increasing the
radius of the core, but the critical mass would increase sharply. Conversely,
decreasing the radius (and increasing the power density) reduces the critical
mass sharply at the cost of reduced breeding ratio, as shown in Table I,
Cases 211061 and 211071. |
The leakage from these reactors is excessive. A reflector more efficient than
the Ni alloy shell could be used to reduce leakage. The results from two cases
of reactors reflected with graphite are shown in Table I, Cases 21208k and 212095,
SECRET
3.
and are there compared with corresponding reactors having Ni alloy shells.
It is seen that although the substitution of the graphite for the Ni had
little effect on the breeding ratio, a substantial decrease in the critical
masses was obtained. Table II gives the breakdown on the neutron balance
for the larger graphite reflected reactor (212084). The fast leakage was
confined to energies above 34 ev and amounted to 0.306 neutrons. The reflec-
tor returned to the core 0.028 neutrons having energies between 0.084 and 34
ev, and 0.153 neutrons at thermal energy (0.084 ev). Somewhat more than half
of these thermal neutrons caused fission, while only about one-fourth were
absorbed in thorium. -This tended to reduce the breeding ratio from the value
of 0.73, observed- in the Ni reflected reactor. However, the saving of thermal
neutrons permitted a reduction in the U-233 concentration, thus increasing the
ratio of absorptions in Th to absorptions in U-233 in the epithermal region.
This increase offset the increase in parasitic captures at thermal energy. It
seems clear that a non-moderating reflector would be better than graphite, pro-
vided the parasitic absorptions are not significantly greater.
The last two cases studied (213127, 213126) concerned reactors having radii of
L inches, with no thorium in the core, and a blanket 16 inches thick. In the
first case, the blanket contained 10 mol percent ThFl, and in the second, no
thorium. The critical masses were nearly equal, ~ 35 kg U-233. The breeding
ratio for the first case was 0.60. Table II gives a breakdown on the neutron
balances for these two cases. It is seen that the majority of the absorptions
are epithermal, and that the fractions of the absorptions in Th and U; which
are epithermal, are greater than the corresponding fraction for the carrier.
The epithermal leakage is seen to be nearly independent of the presence of the
thorium in the blanket, and the thermal leakage is but little affected. This
is thought to signify that neutrons which are not reflected into the core by
their first blanket-collision have little chance of returning to the core by
subsequent collisions, being absorbed by the thorium in the one case and the
carrier in the other.
The critical mass (35 kg) was small compared to the critical masses obtained
for other cases in this study. The breeding ratio was comparable to that
obtained in a one region reactor containing 200 kg of U-233. Clearly, the
breeding ratio can be increased by decreasing the radius of the core. (See
post meeting remarks in appendix.) -
A discussion of the accuracy of the Eyewash code cross sections followed the
presentation of the UNIVAC results. A. M. Weinberg commented that the non-
experimental cross sections in the code apparently have not been recalculated
using the theory now available and that the absorption cross sections may thus
be significantly in error. H. G. MacPherson suggested that the thorium absorp-
tion cross section was the most important in this respect, since it strongly
influences the flux-energy relationship, as well as the breeding ratio, and
since the U-233 and U-235 cross sections are based on experiment. In connection
with the U-233 cross section, he reported that recent experimental results from
Arco indicate that the low value of’? at 2 ev is a resonance and that’? apparently
does hold up well at intermediate energies, confirming Russian data.
D. A. Carrison reported on his multigroup hand caleulations, using the Eyewash e
code groups and cross sections, for bare, homogeneous Li7éBeéU«233dThéF reactorsowgf
SECRET
'SECRET
Reactorwcgde No.
Power Density, w/cc
Core Radius, ino
| ThF) , mol %
UF),, mol %
Region IT
Thickness, in.
ThF), ; mol %
'B.R., Th/U
C.M., kg
Losses, %
Leakage, %
_211010
SEMESICCORSCORIMEIIIREICSS 000 CROCHERCOECSIRETIIICIRD 00 COSNIRGONRGRDE R 0 SRssntciRears I smeD
0.065
- Ni-Mo
211022
50
56
1.66
0.132
Ni Mo
0.49
118
36
U-233 FUSED SALT POWER REACTORS
211033
50
56
3.35
0.24k
Ni Mo
0.3
226
25
13
TABLE I
50
56
6.80
0.677
Ni=Mo
0.87
609
.19
211071
21208k
mmwmmwm
50
56
10.26
1.13
Ni-Mo
0.93
958
16
12
0.61k
Ni =Mo
0.47
132
36
50
56
-3+35
0.161
146
0.6k
107
29
213127 213126
100 100
Iy b
o 0.0
0.
35
31
35
SECRET
60 0
35
57
35.
SECRET
TABLE IT
U-233 FUSED SALT POWER REACTORS
Region I
(Core)
Code No. Item Fast Thermal F& T % Fast
212084 Radius=56", ThFL=3.35 mol %, UFhéOalél mol %
23 fissures 0.2902 0.1120 0.4029 2.2
23 captures 0.0240 0.0112 0.0352 58 .2
Th 10,2914 0.0339 0.3253 89.6
NaZrFs5 0.0739 0.0408 0.11h7 6k .
Total Abs. 0.6793 0.1979 0.8772 T7 b
Leakage 0.279% -0.1528 0.1266 ==
Th/23 0.926 0.275 - —-
213127 Radius=th" , UF)=0.08 mol % .
23 figsures 0.2930 0.0827 . 0.3757 8.0
23 captures 0.0285 0.0082 0.0367 TT- 9
Th - - -
NaZrFs 0.1500 0.0783 0.2283 65 3
Total Abs. O.4715 0.1692 0.6L0T 73.6
Leakage 0.3469 0.0113 0.3582 96.8
Th/23 - - - ea
213126 Radius=44" , UF4=0.078 mol %
23 fissures 0.2976 0.0755 003738 79.7
23 captures 0.0270 -~ 0.0075 0.0345 78.3
Th -- - - -
NaZrFsg 0.1426 0.071+ 0.21k40 66.7
Total Abs. 0.4666 0.154k 0.6223 75.0
Leakage 0.3502 0.0178 0.3680 95.2
Th/23 - - -- -
Neutron Balances
Fast
0.0027
0.0000
Region II
(Blanket or Reflector)
Thermal F+ T
Graphite
- 0.0870 0.0897
0.0317 0.0317
% Fast
3.0
0.0
Blanket Thicknesss16", ThFLs10 mol %, NaZrF5=30 mol %
0.2176
0.0243
0, 2&19
0.0293
0.0145
0.0438
0.0056
0.322
0.2469
0.0388
0.2857
0.0734
o e
88.2
62.6
8h.T7
92.4
= D
Blanket Thicknesss16", ThF)=0 mol %, NaZrFg5=100 mol %
o
0.2480
0.0939
0.0201
0.0000
&= XD
[ g
0.2681
0.0939
92.4
100.0
a0 &R
SECRET
SECRET
FIGURE 1.
BREEDING RATIO AND CRITICAL MASS IN A
ONE REGION, HOMOGENEOUS, FUSED SALT, BREEDING REACTOR
Fuel: UFy, ThF),, ZrF),, NeF
Diameter: O ft, 4 in.
Shell: 1 inch of Ni-Mo Alloy
. Temperature: 1283°F
Reflector: None
Critical Mass of Burner (TfiFM = 0) = 58 kg U-233
Power: 600 mw of heat at a power demsity of 50 watts/cc
Fisslon Product Poisoning: None
Method of Calculation: Univac Code Murine-Eyewash, 24 groups, 2 regions
1.0 20
mm——— O -
| —
Breeding o— —
| Ratia - — ?
008 ‘ » \ // | / -
O
0.6 A L 12
/ | 0
®w
g
/;) | -
| | | o
o . _ - &
E ' 00)'8" / ‘ / \ ‘ . 8 S
o , o4
0%? | T Relative v
o _ / : Critical o
@ i Mass a3
S | .. 1
@ 02| [ 7 ' X
L 6 8 | 10 SECRET
" ThF), Concentration in Fuel, Mol %
SECRET o
To
For a 10-foot diameter sphere with 1200°F fuel of composition 63 LiF-15 BeFo-
20 ThFL-2.16 UFL, the breeding ratio was 1.05 and the leakage T.6 percent.
Reducing the diameter to 7 feet, changed the UF), concentration to 2.24 mol
percent and decreased the B.R. to 1.00. Leaving the diameter at 10 feet and
reducing the ThF) to 10 percent, reduced the B.R. to 0.98. With a 51 LiF-
45 BeFp-4 ThF) (plus 0.24-0.27 percent UF)) fuel, the B.R. was 0.84 for a
10-foot reactor and 0.64 for a T-foot reactor. Carrison pointed out that
these were not thermal reactors, even though the Li-Be carrier was used.
About half the neutrons are absorbed or leak above 9118 ev for the 20 percent
ThF), fuel, and above 454 ev for the 4 percent fuel. The main advantage of
the Li-Be salts is their lower melting points. He also pointed out that
apparently inelastic scattering by fluorine was not coupensated for in the
Eyewagh ¢y values. A. M. Weinberg commented that the breeding ratios calcu-=
lated are high because captures by Pa-233 are neglected, and that this
would be significant in a high power density reactor.
J. T. Roberts reported on a brief survey of the 1953 MIT and 1956 ORSORT
designs for fast reactors using chloride fused salts. Both studies neglected
the high n,p cross section of Cl-=35. Roberts reported rough estimates of
C1-37 costs obtained from Y-12 and K-25 of $5/gm for chemical exchange and
$1/gm for gaseous diffusion. The chemical exchange cost is based on present
technology. In principle, much better processes could be developed. The
gaseous diffusion cost is based on separation of anhydrous HCl in present K-25
type equipment, assuming the same efficiency. J. A. Swartout commented that
K-25 equipment would not resist attack by HCl. Other than the Cl-37 problem,
development work indicated for chloride salt fast reactors is much the same
as for fluoride reactors (i.e., cross sections, materials of construction,
components) .
H. G. MacPherson reported that L. A. Mann is making a trip to obtain informa-
tion on components, especially heat exchangers.
J. T. Roberts summarized the results of a preliminary look at optimization of
net fuel cost in & single region breeder. Based on multigroup calculations
for a 600 mw, bare, homogeneous , spherical reactor with 50 NaF-U6 ZrF) -k
(Th-+'U233)FM fuel and varying core radius (at constant extermal holdup of
423 ft3)9 and chemical processing cycle time (batch), the minimum fuel cost
reactor was as follows: |
Radius: 6.4 ft
U-233 Inventory: 813 kg
Core Power Density: 19 watts/cc
Processing Cycle: 21.6 yrs
Neutron Balance:
U-233 1,000
Th (average) .762 = B.R. (clean, infinite
F.P, poisons (average) .129 | (B.R. =1.15
Leakage | .26k
Na 013
Zr 014
F | 0,129
’ 2031 &= YZ
SECRET
SECRET
8.
Fuel Cost Breakdown: |
U-233 burn-up 0.595 ) 0.599
Th burn-up 0.00k4 )
U=-233 inventory 0.385 ) |
Th inventory 0.012 ) 0.597
Salt inventory 0.200 )
U-233 processing 0.045 )
Th processing 0.013 ) 0.135
Salt processing 0.077 ) ,
1.33 mils/kwh
The assumptions were: (1) F.P. poisons build up-as in a thermal reactor;
(2) U-233 costs $18.5/gm, thorium, $40/kg, and salt, $7.5/1b; (3) inventory
charges are 4 percent for U-233 and Th, and 12 percent for salt; and (4) pro-
cessing costs $1.85/gm for U-233, $40/kg for Th, and $7.5/1b for salt.
A. M. Weinberg commented that the assumption regarding ¥.P. poisons was too
optimistic for such an intermediate reactor. For a faster rate of poison
build-up, the optimum reactor would be smaller, the processing time shorter,
and the net fuel cost greater. H. G. MacPherson commented on the possibility
of starting up such a reactor on U-235 (whose critical mass was estimated by
Roberts to be 2.26 times that of U-233), and having to withdraw uranium
initially. E. R. Mann and E. S. Bettis commented on the "sleeping giant”
aspects of such a large, low power density reactor from the control point
il
of view.
quGo Alexander
0T 20 lend
J. T. Roberts
LGA/JTR/ds
Att.
SECRET
APPENDIX A-1
(Post Meeting Remarks by L. G. Alexander)
The breeding ratios in the two region reactors (Case 213127) could be
increased in a number of ways.
APPENDIX A-2
The radius of the core could be decreased; this would require operation
at a higher power density for the same rated power level, but might also
result in a decrease in critical mass. The power density could be held
stant and the leakage increased by utilizing a spherical annulus for
the fuel region. The central void would be filled with some material of
low capture cross section and low moderating power. The critical mass
would increase somewhat, but probably not as fast as the leakage. The
leakage could be increased "internally” by adding ThF) to the core, either
homogeneously or heterogeneously (e.g., in tubes). This would tend to
increase the critical mass, but would also tend to suppress parasitic
absorptions in the carrier in the core.
A consideration of the various factors involved leads to the conclusion
that the optimum breeding system will probably consist of a two region
reactor having a core containing some thorium (perhaps the maximum per-
missible, from nelting point considerations) and surrounded by a blanket
containing very high concentrations of thorium.
APPENDIX A-3
From a nuclear standpoint, thorium metal is the most desirable blanket
material. Because of its low moderating power, the energies of neutrons
reflected into the core would not be lowered much; of course, parasitic
captures in the blanket would be reduced to a minimum. But, in order to
prevent large reactivity changes due to formation of fissionable material
in the blanket and to prevent losses of Pa by neutron capture, it will be
necessary to process the blanket at a fairly rapid rate. The processing
of metal elements is disadvantageous. In Reactor Case 213127, only 85
percent of the neutrons absorbed in the blanket were captured by thorium,
but the thorium concentration there (10 mol percent ThFu) is probably
already higher than can be maintained in practice. It seems imperative
to achieve a greater thorium density. Some alternate possibilities for
the blanket include 20 mol percent ThF) in Li-Be fluoride melt (being
studied by D. A. Carrison); uranium oxide plasticized by sodium (proposed
by Bulmer et al); uranium oxide or fluoride powder in tubes. It is doubt-
ful that the last two materials can be handled as fluids.
A study of a series of reactor cases along the indicated lines is being
planned.