-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-TM-3064.txt
13175 lines (5009 loc) · 183 KB
/
ORNL-TM-3064.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
e et
-
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
ORNL- TM- 3064
MASTER
- INFLUENCE OF TITANIUM, ZIRCONIUM, AND HAFNIUM ADDITIONS ON THE
RESISTANCE OF MODIFIED HASTELLOY N TO IRRADIATION DAMAGE
= AT HIGH TEMPERATURE - PHASE |
: H. E. McCoy, Jr.
THIS DOCUMEN
TCo |
UNCLASsiFIEp TMED AS
DIVIS]
By SION OF CLASSIFICATION
DATE 155
s
y NOTICE This document contains information of a preliminary nature P82;}
3
ond was prepared primarily for internal use at the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. It is subject to revision or correction and therefore does
not represent a final report.
PISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT 1S UNLIMITER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United
States Government, Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic
Energy Commission, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors,
subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or
represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
ar
c’
T
»
ORNL~-TM-3064
Contract No. W-7405-eng-26
METALS AND CERAMICS DIVISION
INFLUENCE OF TITANTUM, ZIRCONIUM, AND HAFNIUM ADDITIONS ON THE
RESISTANCE OF MODIFIED HASTELLOY N TO IRRADIATION DAMAGE
AT HIGH TEMPERATURE — PHASE I
H. E. McCoy, Jr.
- JANUARY 1971
LEGAL NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of work
sponsored by the United States Government, Neither
the United States nor-the United States Atomic Energy
Commission, nor any .of their employees, nor any of
their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees,
makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any
; legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, com- |-
| pleteness or usefulness of any information, apparatus,
product or process disclosed, or represents that its use
would not in_fringe privately _owned rights, :
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
~ Oak Ridge, Tennessee
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITER
L&
o) l‘
iii
CONTENTS
Abstract .
Introduction . . . . . « . . « .+ . .
Experimental Details .
Test Materials . . . . . .
Irradiation Conditions .
Testing Procedure
Experimental Results .
Alloys Containing Titanium .
Alloys Containing Zirconium
Alloys Containing Hafnium
Alloys Containing No Additions .
Discussion of Results
Summary . . .
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . .
Page
bt YN
50
100
124
135
143
143
)
INFLUENCE OF TITANIUM, ZIRCONIUM, AND HAFNIUM ADDITIONS ON THE
RESISTANCE OF MODIFIED HASTELLOY N TO IRRADIATION DAMAGE
AT HIGH TEMPERATURE — PHASE 1
H. E. McCoy, Jr.
ABSTRACT
The influence of small additions of Ti, Zr, and Hf on
the mechanical properties of a modified Hastelloy N with the
nominal composition Ni—12% Mo—7% Cr—0.2% Mn—0.05% C is
described in this report. It deals specifically with test
results from numerous, small, laboratory melts and several
100-1b melts from commercial vendors. Additions of Ti, Zr,
and Hf had beneficial effects on the properties of the alloy
both unirradiated and after irradiation. Irradiation temper-
ature had a marked effect upon the properties of all alloys
investigated. Generally, good properties were observed when
the irradiation temperature was 650°C or less and poor when
the temperature was 700°C or higher. We attributed this
large effect of irradiation temperature to coarsening of the
carbide structure at the higher temperature.
INTRODUCTION
Previous studies!™ showed Hastelloy N (Ni-16% Mo—7% Cr—4% Fe-0.05% C)
susceptible to a type of damage produced by irradiation at high tempera-
tures that results in reduced stress-rupture éroperties and fracture duc-
tility. One approach to solv1ng thls problem is that of making slight
changes in the chemistry of the alloy We initially modified the base
comp031t10n to Ni—12% Mo—7% Cr—0.2% Mn—0.05% C to obtain_an“alldy that
- 14, E. McCoy and J. R. Welr, "Stress—Rupture ProPertles of Irra-
diated and Unirradiated Hastelloy N Tubes," Nucl. Aggl. 4(2) 96104
(1968).
°H. E. MtCoy, "Varlation of Mechanical Propertles ‘of Trradiated
Hastelloy N with Strain Rate,"” J. Nucl. Mater. 31(1), 67-85 (1969).
34. E. McCoy, An Evaluation of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment
Hastelloy N Surveillance Specimens — First Group, ORNI~TM-1997 (1967).
“H. E. McCoy, An Evaluation of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment
Hastelloy N Surveillance Specimens — Second Group, ORNL-TM-2359 (1969).
was free of the stringers of the MgC type of carbide (where M is the
metallic component) characteristically found in standard Hastelloy N.
We then made a number of laboratory melts with various additions of Ti,
Zr, and Hf, since they form very strong, stable diborides® and should
tie up the boron as compounds rather than allow it to segregate to the
grain boundaries. The more random distribution of the boron should
reduce the radiation damage by reducing the concentration at grain
boundaries of helium produced by the 1°B(n,x) reaction.
The results of tensile and cfeep tests on these experimental alloys
show that the resistance to irradiation damage is improved by the addi-
tion of Ti, 2r, or Hf. Results of tests on the first small (100-1b) heats
of commercial alloys that contained these same alloy additions also indi-
cate improved properties.
EXPERIMENTAL DETATILS
Test Materials
Our alloys were nonconsumably arc melted in an argon atmosphere
from melting stock of commercial purity. A starting charge of about
2 1b was consolidated and melted several times. The charge was then
placed in another arc-melting furnace with & hearth for drop casting.
The alloy was again melted and drop cast into a l-in.-diam X 6-in.-long
ingot. The ingot was swaged to 1/4-in.-diam rod by the following sched-
ule: from 1 in. to 3/4 in. at 1177°C, from 3/4 in. to 7/16 in. at 871°C,
and from 7/16 in. to 1/4 in. at ambient temperature.
The commercial melts were melted by vacuum induction and cast into
six 4-in.-diem ingots that weighed abéut 16 1b each. They were initially
forged at 1177°C; the final working was done at room temperature. The
final product was small 1/2-in.-thick plates with 40% cold work.
The chemical analysis of each alloy used in this study is given in
Table 1.
°B. Post, "Refractory Binary Borides," p. 340 in Boron, Metallo-
Boron Compounds and Boranes, ed. by R. M. Adams, Interscience, New York,
1964.
L
Weight
of Melf;
(1v)
fppmf
B
Other
Ti
Composition
(wt %)
Chemical Compositions of Alloys
Si
Fe
‘Table 1.
Cr
Mo
)
_Alloy'
Number
PN AN AN NANANNNNDANNNNANANNDONANNN N
8 83 8388
— —~ ~ ~ ~
NN NN ~t =1 N
OCOO0OO0OO0C0O00O0 ~-NOOOON o o ™
OO0 000000 COO0CO0OO0O0O0O0 A NO OO
o O VO W O
O ™ _I_O_I_BL.O:J
oo OCOO0CO00O0
ol nou o f
© o HHH YN H A
mom mmmm T m
0
Y Mo M M — O wnun O NN AdHO
QOJOOOOOOO. 01257B9%3000000000
00000000 000001000000000000
VVVVVVVYV V Vv V
i M
HeAO HnNO o0 Oddrd A0 0O A4 A4+ 0O
0133568 90400000000000000001
0OOOOOO101000000000000000000
V VVVVYV VVVVYV Vv
NI NN A 0N 1N 1A 100 N o o
mWnumwnununununuq,q,mumwnumWnunumw1¢1+qu,1*1_1_1_1*9~nu
OO0 BC0O0dODOOOd00D000000OD
0000000000000 000000000000OO0
VVVVVVVVVYV VVVVYV vV V V
—~ O O~ oy H N ~ 0\ N O D~ n
DRSO 8RYNa 08NSy DO MMM NN
OCOOHO0000C000H00 Abo0ooooAAO
CO000000O00O00O0O000 00000000000
VvV V
O00O00OO0O0OO0OOAMHMHOAMHMNM OOV HHW 0
‘ 9~9~9%9~9~9~9~9#9~9~9~9~9~1_9~9~9~9~1*1*9~1*mmw*wu wu1*
O000O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0OO0O0
.....
neutrons cm
The rods were fabricated into the test specimens shown in Fig. 1.
Our work with this specimen has shown that the rest results are reproduc-
ible and agree quite well with those obtained for more massive specimens.
However, there is sufficient stress concentration to cause some of the
more brittle specimens to break in the radius at the end of the gage
length.
ORNL-DWG 67-3013R
gL £e é'e'
g8 £ 8
% oo &o
@ © .'ml
0=
83 13 63
o -5 - =
o o o-Q
’ 0.25C in. | .
DIAM
1 0.0005
ko.ees‘rs Q0003 RADIUS (TYP)
b —— 3/8 in,——e=i
1425 in,———
1 73 in. o
Fig. 1. Specimen Used for Tests of Mechanical Properties.
Irradiation Conditions
The results presehted here were obtained from specimens irradiated
in several experiments. These experiments were carried out in three
reactors: the Engineering Test Reactor (ETR) at Idaho Falls, Idaho,
and the Oak Ridge Research Reactor (ORR) and Molten Salt Reactor Experi-
ment (MSRE) at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. A core facility was used in the
ETR where the thermal and fast (> 1 Mev) fluxes were each 3.2 X 1014
2 sec”™? and the fluence was 6 X 1020 neutrons/em?. The ETR
experiments were uninstrumented, and the design temperatures were either
below 150°C or 600 * 100°C. Melt wires included in these experiments
indicated that the operating temperatures were within the desired range.
The experiments in the ORR were performed in a poolside facility where
the peak fluxes were 6 X 1013 neutrons ecm™® sec™! (thermal) and
5 x 1012 peutrons cm™2 sec”! (> 2.9 Mev). The experiments were run for
4!
.
)
either one or two cycles so that the thermal fluence was 2 to 5 x 1020
neutrons/cm? and the fast fluence was 2 to 4 x 10'° neutrons/em®. These
'experimehts were instrumEntéd; and the temperatures were controlled at
650 to 871°C. The‘experiments in the MSRE were run in the center of the
core, where the thermal flux was 4.1 X 1012 neutrons cm™? sec™! and the
fast (> 1.22 Mev) flux was 1.0 X 10’2 neutrons cm™? sec™!. The samples
were exposed to a noncorrosive fluoride salt environment for 4800 hr at
645 + 10°C and received arthermAl fluence of 1.3 X 102° neutrons/cm® and
a fast fluence of 3.1 X lOlg'neutrons/cm?; - Since we could not see any
consistent effects of thermal-neutron'fluence over the small range
enéountered in these experiments, we present our date in this paper as
having been obtained at a common fluence.
Testing Procedure
The creep-rupture tests after irradiation were run in lever-arm
creep machines in the hot'céllszatrthe Oak Ridge National LaboratoryQ
The strain was méasured by an extensometer with rods attached to the
upper and lower specimen grips. The relative movement of these two rods
was measured by a linear differential transformer, and the transformer
signal was recorded. The aécuracy of the strain measurements is about
+0.1%, considering fhe effects‘of'aMbiént temperature variations in the
hot cell, mechanical vibrations, etc. This accuracy is considerably
‘better than the specimen-to-specimen reproducibility that one would
. expegt.for.this_allqy.;'The systems for measuring and controlling temper-
ature combine to give a temperature uncertainty of about *1%.
‘The tensile testS‘weféfrun.Qn Instron Universal Testing Machines.
' The strain measurements were taken from the crosshead travel.
. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
A11oystohtaining Titanium
‘The alloys with additions of titanium fell into three groups. The
first group, alloys 100 through 107, contained from less than 0.0l to
6
1.04% Ti. These alloys were of the nominal base composition of Ni—12% Mo—
7% Cr—0.2% Mn—0.05% C. Typical microstructures of these alloys after a
1-hr anneal at 1177°C are shown in Fig. 2. The alloys were all free of
intermetallic precipitates and contained only a small amount of carbide
precipitates. Generally, the amount of carbide increased-and the
grain size decreased with increasing titanium concentration. The second
group, alloys 75 and 76, contained 1% Ti and'were made to explore the
influence of varying carbon content. Typical microstructures of these
alloys are shown in Fig. 3. The third material, a 100-1b commercial
alloy from Special Metals Corporation, designated heat 21545, contained
0.49% Ti. Typical microstructures of this alloy are shown in Fig. 4.
This alloy had a nominal composition quite close to that of alloy 104,
and the microstructures of the two alloys after a l-hr anneal at 1177°C
were quite similar except that the commercisl alloy contained patches of
precipitate. Close examination showed these regions to be quite high in
molybdenum. Some of the precipitates were carbides of the MC type and
others were almost pure molybdenum. The grain size after annealing for
100 hr at 871°C was quite fine, and copious quantities of carbide pfe-
cipitates were present. '
Alloys 100 through 107 were tested under & variety of conditioms.
Tensile tests were run at 650°C on samples that had been annealed 1 hr
at 1177°C and aged 1000 hr at 650°C to duplicate the thermal history of
irradiated semples. The results of these tests are summarized in
Table 2. The variation of the tensile and yield strengths with titaniuwm
content is shown in Fig. 5. The yield strength increased with increasing
titanium. The tensile strength varied in a poorly defined manner: at
a strain rate of 0.05 min~!, it increased systematically with increasing
titenium, and at a rate of 0.002 min~! it reached a maximm at 0.55% Ti.
The variation of the fracture strain with titanium content is shown in
' Fig. 6. At a strain rate of 0.05 min~!, the addition of 0.11% Ti greatly
increased the fracture strain; further additions decreased the fracture
strain. At a strain rate of 0.002 min~!, the fracture strain improved
greatly with the addition of 0.11% Ti, and further additions caused a
gradual improvement.
¥
n
\_,’
-Alloy 104 §
Fig. 2. Photomierographs of Alloys That Contain Various Amounts of
Titanium. The basic composition is Ni—12% Mo-7% Cr—0.2% Mn~0.05% C.
gi?" Etchant: glyceria regia. 100x. Reduced 38%.
o)
d o~ Y=-68104 B
8 .
5?-;.- ' YA
‘*{?;&
e
o) A
PRRhY
. : S .ga S
Fig. 3. Photomicerographs of Alloys (a) 75 and (b) 76. The nominal
chemical compositions are Ni—-12% Mo—7% Cr-0.2% Mn—1% Ti-0.05% C and
Ni—-12% Mo—7% Cr—0.2% Mn—1.0% Ti-0.10% C, respectively. Etchant:
glyceria regia. 100x. =
»)
W
)
!
T
Y-75750
4
»}r
‘Photomicrographs of Heat 21545, which Containe
OC,
ie,
lor
nnealed 100 hr at 871°C, 100
(a) Annealed 1 hr at 1177
Sample (b) etched with hydroch
49% Ti.
d O.
°C, 1000x; (c) and (4) a
ith glyceria regia.
itate after anneal of 1 hr at 1177
Reduced 28%.
Samples (a), (c), and (d) ‘etched w
w
Lo
or{
Q
o
O
B
3D
O o
Q ~
< 8%
5
s~ »
w L X
i, O o
= O o
0
S Ea
-l g o
10
' . . a
Table 2. Tensile Properties of Several Unirradiated
- Pitanium-Modified Alloys at 650°C
, P - Reductio;
Alloy Specimen Strain Stress, psi Elongation, % z #:rlzn
- Rete = yie1g Uitimate G m Totel 1B Are
Number Number (min=1) Tensile
x 103 x 103
100 1906 0.05 7.1 77 .4 43,6 44,2 34.2
100 1910 0.002 30 73.7 27.8 29.7 25.6
101 1933 0.05 27.9 82.6 62.1 64.8 4 2
101 1926 0.002 27.4 75.2 33.0 37.3 29.2
102 1943 0.05 . 31.1 87.1 51.2 53.2 42.7
102 1952 0.002 30.9 78.4 31.4 37.5 - 32.8
103 1962 0.05 31.5 87.7 51.4 54.0 47.3
103 1968 0.002 28.9 69.4 24.5 37.5 33.8
104 1987 0.05 31.1 87.5 51.0 53.0 42.4
104 1984 0.002 35.4 87.9 28.2 36.7 - 28.8
105 2007 0.05 34.2 93.6 51.0 52.8 45.0
105 2004 0.002 34.3 84.1 31.9 40.3 32.4_
106 2023 0.05 34.8 100.7 45,4 47.3 40.3
106 2026 0.002 33.9 79.8 26.0 37.8 35.1
107 2039 0.05 36.4 99.2 43.8 46.1 36.4
107 2041 0.002 33.7 75.1 22.3 38.5 32.5
®Annealed 1 hr at 1177°C and aged 1000 hr at 650°C.
ORNL-DWG £9-14398R
{xi0%)
g
@ STRAIN RATE = 0.05 min
° RATE = min~!
STRESS (ps)
3
40
0
o 0.2 0.4 06 0.8 1.0 1.2 .4
* - TITANIUM CONTENT (wt %)
Fig. 5. Influence of Titanium Content on the Yield and Ultimate
Tensile Strengths at 650°C after Annealing 1 hr at 1177°C and Aging
1000 hr at 650°C.
iy
11
ORNL-DWG 69-14397TR
85 | | |
A STRAIN RATE=0.05 min™ "
© STRAIN RATE=0.002 min™
€0 ANNEALED thr AT H7T°C
AGED 1000 hr AT 650°C
TESTED AT €50°C
55
_s0
& \
z L
g ' \-n.__
g as
=1 \
ul
g
= Q
40
| et
___—_D-———_
o
38 /;"
30
25
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
TITANIUM CONTENT (wt %}
Fig. 6. Influence of Titanium Content on the Tensile Fracture Strain
at 650°C of Ni—12% Mo—7% Cr-0.2% Mn—0.05% C Alloys.
Alloys 100 through 107 were irradiated at 650°C to a thermal fluence
of 2.5 X 1020 peutrons/em?. The results of tensile tests at 650°C after
irradiation are summarized in Table 3. The fracture strains measured at
650°C are plotted as a function of titanium content in Fig. 7. The data
exhibit considerable variation, but show no systematic variation with
- titanium concentration.'_The*results of these tests are analyzed further
in Fig. 8, where the ratios offfiheivarious tensile proyerties'of the irra-
'7 :diéted_and unirradiated*&libYS aréECOmpared. The yield stress is increased
by irradiation, and the tensile stress and fracture strain are decreased.
However, the ratios are éfily{modérately dependent updh the titanium level.
Another set of samples of alloys 100 through 107 was irradiated at
50°C to a thermal fluence of 9 x 10'° neutrons/cm®. The results of ten-
sile tests of these sam§les ét:650 and 760°C are given in_Tabl¢_4. Com-
‘parison of these;results WithfltbOSé in Table 3 for the samples irradiated
to a higher fluence at a higher temperature reveals that the fracture
strains are higher for the samples irradiated at 50°C. The fracture
12
Table 3. Tensile Properties of Several Titanium-Modified
Alloys Tested at 650°C after Irradiastion®
' 3 Reducti
Alloy Specimen Strain _ Stress, psi Elongation, % ?.nuAr on
Number Number ,o%€ . Yield Ultimate Gyporm Total - ( )ea
(min~1) Tensile : ®
x 10° x 103
100 1908 0.05 31.5 66.3 26.3 26.6 23.3
100 1912 0.002 26.3 48.8 134 1.1 13.1
101 1924 0.05 35.5 68.9 23.2 - 23.7 19.1
101 1925 0.002 36.9 57.2 10.7 10.9 12.5
102 1949 0.05 35.1 74.8 33.7 35.1 28.8
- 102 1951 0.002 37.7 67.8 18.5 19.2 14.9
103 1978 0.002 35.3 65.9 21.9 22.8 18.8
104 2006 0.002 39.0 65.2 14.5 15.4 15.6
105 1989 0.002 35.5 69.7 21.9 22.7 31.6
106 2021 0.002 39.2 65.1 12.0 12.6 Yo b
107 2051 0.002 39.3 71.6 15.9 16.3 13.0
®pnnealed 1 hr at 1177°C before irradiation at 650°C to a thermal
fluence of 2.5 X 102° neutrons/em?.
ORNL-DWG 69-14396R
36 2 T T 1
& STRAIN RATE=0.05 min!
© STRAIN RATE=0,002 mir~
32 ANNEALED {hr AT HT77°C —
IRRADIATION CONDITIONS
TEMPERATURE = 650°C
28 TIME 24000 hr .
THERMAL FLUENCE =
& 2.5x%4020 r\emrcms/crn2
24 =
o o
8
£ 20
& d
-~
w
€ a
§ 16 °
£
D
12
o
8
4
.
0
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
TITANIUM CONTENT {(wt %)
Fig. 7. Influence of Titanium Content on the Tensile Fracture
Strain at 650°C of Ni-12% Mo~7% Cr-0.05% C Alloys after Irradiation.
ORNL-DWG 69-14395R