-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-TM-3303.txt
1033 lines (625 loc) · 39.5 KB
/
ORNL-TM-3303.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
P~ > OAK ;’R]DGE NATlONAL LABORATORY
R s S o b 8 gt ek s e s~ ety g . - 5 et R SR e - Friae v § i
T S . ™ ! L “por Ty b e - ; R T prusonrTR e T L 2 S ST i e e oo 1 s IR e O e a i ol e o e S o it | Lo o, Tyt PRTRpre - v N e
S | :3foperated by e ST
{_f-f-'_-umon CARBIDE CORPORATION ¢ NUCLEAR DWISION Bl
L 3 -ui for the_iflfgux.r: ,,_,ff:' R
Uas ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ______ C
S - ORNL- TM 3303
DATE "_; August 5 1971
_T___i'_'-'FURTHER DISCUSSION OF 1NSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS L
DEVELOPMENT NEEDED FOR THE MOLTEN SALT BREEDER | j. R
R Prevaously pubhshed mformahon (J.R. Tallcckson ’ R. L Moore ; und S J Dlflo, |
Efifi_;f-;.,--l'{_f..;.-Insi‘rumem‘c:tu:m and Controls Development for Molten=-Salt Breeder Reactors, ORNL-TM-
1858, May 1967) concerning the development and evaluation of Process instrumentation
S -'?"_'_‘app‘hccble to molten-salt breeder reactors: (MSBR) was updated. Areas. where Snstrumenta- v
'~ “tion techniques and components tested durmg Operahon of the Molten-Salt Breeder |
" Experiment may be applicable to the MSBR are described and recommendation for further - -
-~ ... development are stated. In thls study to date, no problems are foreseen that cre beyond o
Tl ;ihe present sfate of the art, s 7 S St
ST _eywords Developmenf flu:d-f redcfors:fusedsali'smsfrumenfcfion,MSRE, o
L, "_j__;__-’_;zy'-iMSBE MSBR reactors S e T L e T e
LT -ZIU“cEThls “document ° eontoms mformahon of a prehmmory nature -
- .2 and-was_prepared- primarily. for -internal .use at the Ock Ridge Nahonal _ -
o 'Luborufory At s sub;ect #o fevmon or correction and therefore does T
e "nof represem o finalreport. .. . | : S .
o s o T
§
i
g
i
This report was prepared as an_account of work sponsored by the Uni__fed
States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic
Energy Commission, nor any of their 'emplrdyees, nor any of their contractors,
subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or -
assumes any legal liability or responsibitity for the accuracy, completeness or-
usefylness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or
represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
iy
%
fipl
(-) a2 'fl_
&)
n
0 0 N Oy AW -
S
Introduction
General Comments
Temperature Meosureme nt
Pressure Measure ment
CONTENTS
leferenhal Pressure Measurement
" Flow Measuremenf
Level Measuremenf
,Salt lnventory Measureme
nf
- Containment Penetrahon Seals
' Gas-System Control Valves
“NOTICE-
This report was- piepared as an- account of work
sponsored by the United States Government. Neither
. | the United States nor the United States Atomic Energy | -
~."| ‘Commission, nor any -of ‘their employees, nor any of |
| -their’ contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, |
--'| ‘makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any .
=+ 7} legal . Hability or responsibility for the accuracy; com-
..} pleteness or usefulness of any information, apparatus,
| ‘product or process disclosed, or represents that its use
=l would not infrmge privately owned rights
. BISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS ENLIMITED
Page
W O S~ M
11
13
15
16
1. INTRODUCTION
In a previous report,® Tallackson, Moore, and Ditto had discussed
their evaluation of instrumentation tested during operation of the Molten Salt
Reactor' Experiment (MSRE) and its suitability and deficiencies for gpplication
to molten-salt breeder reactors (MSBR's).27® Many of the instrument components
used successfully in the MSRE will be directly applicable'fo the MSBR. This
report summarizes and updates the material covered in the previous (ref. 1)
report. The scope of coverage is confined to process instrumentation; it does not
cover nuclear instrumentation because recent advancements in the development
of high temperature nuclear detectors would make such discussion premature.
After these latter developments have been adequately reviewed and evaluated for
application to MSBR's, they too will be reported. -
2. GENERAL COMMENTS
Although it is reasonable to expect that MSBR process instrumentation.
will require designs beyond the present state of the art, no problems are
foreseen that could not be resolved by further developme nt of components and
techniques. Many instrument components used successfully in the MSRE will be
directly applicable to the MSBR. Similarly, experience being gained by the
utilities industry with instrumentation of supercritical pressure steam systems will
be applicable to the MSBR.
MSBR process instrumentation located outside the biologically shielded
areas and not an integral part of the containment system can be conventional
equipment. Some standard components, however, may require some upgrading,
and a strict quality control program will be required to ensure a level of relidbility
and performance commensurate with MSBR requirements.
1 J. R. Tallackson, R. L. Moore, and S. J. Ditto, Instrumentation and
Controls Development for Molfen Salt Breeder Reactors, ORNL-TM-1856
(May 22, 1971).
2pP. R. Kasten, E. S. Bettis, and R. C. Robertson, Design Studies of
1000-Mw(E) Molten-Salt Breeder Reactors, ORNL-3996 (August 1966).
. 2R. B. Briggs, Summary of Objectives and a Program of Developmenr of
Molten-Salt Breeder Reactors, TM-1851 (June 1967).
-
(" ".\ "
S
All process tnstrumentohon components Iocored wrthm the contommenf
cells or as an _integral part of the containment system must. probobly be considered
" developmental. - These componenfs are predominantiy primary sensing elements
for measurement of flow rates, pressures,. levels, weights, and temperatures in
the salt-containing pipes and vessels, in the associated purge and off-gas systems,
and in the salt chemical processing facilities. Other such components are final
control elements (such as off~gas control valves), leadwire and piping connections
to the sensing and final control elements, remotely operated disconnects, and
containment penetrotlon seals. .
| Present plons,-,fo-,control the temperature of the reactor, drain, and steam=
generating equipment by furnace heating will preclude the use of some devices
and techniques that were employed successfully in the lower-temperature environ-
ment of the MSRE. The physical size of the components and the space available
for equipment could restrict otherwise acceptable techniques, such as weighing
~sqalt tanks, and tend to oggrovofe some problem areas, such as insulation shunf
- resusfonce in signal cobles., S |
Tl'le elecrrrcal conduchvrty of fhe MSBR salts wrll be a srgmfrcont factor in
e lecting the type of primary sensing elements that can be used. Although the con-
ductivities of MSBR salts are not known with certainty, they are estimated to be
about 1 mho/cm--about the same as MSRE salts. If these conductivities were an
“order.of magnitude less, some of the MSRE devices could not be used. Conversely,
if these conductivities were significantly higher, the existing devices would perform
better; and possibly some techniques that could not be used in the MSRE could be
- used in an MSBR. For example, srgnrfsconfly I-ngher conduchvrhes would permit use
of @ mognehc flowmeter. s ,
Development of other equrpment and techmques, such as an electr:cul
penetration into salt-containing pipes and vessels, would undoubtedly lead to
improved instrumentation and new ideas for development. Some development
will also be required to adapt 'MSRE ‘control components to fhe hrgh pressures and
| ---remperotures in some portsons of rhe MSBR | -
e --_3.3-TEMPE-RATUREMEA’SUREMENT:__-'_' R
The materials and rechnlques that were used for measurement of MSRE
“temperatures should be odequate for most MSBR opplrcohons, although furnace
heating of the MSBR reactor cell will create new problems that might require.
*further development. It is expected that much of the test data and equipment
procurement standards being developed in the LMFBR thermometry program will be
applicable to the selection and development of instrumentation for MSBR tempera-
ture meosuremenf
6
The reactor cell temperature of ~ 1000°F will require development of in-cell
leadwire, disconnects, and containment penetration seals. Additional development
‘will be required to obtain greater measurement ac¢uracy and to ensure long=term
(30-year) performance. Development effort could also be profitably applied to
methods of thermocouple attachment, to an investigation of radiation pyrometry
- techniques, and to measurement of srnall dnfferentml femperafures at elevcfed
temperctures.
| 4
Although ‘the performance of ‘MSRE thermocouples was very encouraging,
improved measurement accuracy and drift stability are needed. Measurement of -
small differences between two high temperatures was not satisfactorily accomplished.
The accuracy obtained with series~opposed (bucking) thermocouples and extreme
care in design and installation was generally adequate for MSRE purposes, but, -
without furfher development, it msght be only marginal for the MSBR.
- The femperatures of heated pipes and vessels in the MSRE were measured
by mmerul-msulated Inconel-sheathed, Chromel-Alumel thermocouples. Results
of developmental tests and observation of the field performance of this type of
thermocouple indicate that an initial (hot junction) measurement accuracy of +2°F
- and a long=term (noncumulative) drift rate of less than 2°F/year can be obtained
~ ot operating temperatures.in a range from O to 1300°F if (1) the thermocouples are
carefully selected and calibrated, (2) attention is paid to details during design,
fabrication, and installation, and (3) strict quality control is maintained. In
particular, the materials must be handled and assembled with cleanliness, the
composition of the insulation must be controlled to specified values, and the grode
and homogeneity of the thermocouple wire materials must be carefully controlled. To
obtain highest accuracy, the design of the sensors and their installation must protect
them against stray radiative and convective heat sources which might result
in heat transfer to or from the sensor and, thus, biaosed measurements.
~ There is a good possibility that improved accuracy of both absolute and
differential measurements of high temperatures in molten=-salt systems can be obtained
by using ceramic-insulated platinum resistance thermometers. Several companies
have recently marketed resistance thermometers rated for operation at MSBR tempera-
tures and higher. Several thermometers rated at 850°C (1562°F) were tested at
ORNL for stability.® Although the calibration shifts were excessive in initial thermal
cycle tests, it was later demonstrated that these shifts would be decreased to accept-
able levels by operating the thermometers at the maximum rated temperature for more
than one week. Although the results obtained aofter high-temperature stabilization
¢ Molten-Salt Reactor Program Semiannual Progress Report for Penod
Ending August 31, 1967, ORNL-4191, pp. 22-24, 47.
® Molten-Salt Reactor Program Semiannual Progress Report for Perlod
Ending August 31, 1968, "ORNL-4344, pp. 94-95.
"
w'
( o’ . ¥
7
- were: encourqglng , more data are needed to determine the long-term stability of
these devices. The LMFBR Thermometry Program at ORNL mcludes plans for:
= repeatmg cmd expandmg these tests. =
Multlconductor, gloss-msulated silicone=impregnated, copper-sheathed
thermocouple cables used in the MSRE between the in-cell disconnects and the
out=of=cell junction boxes will not be usable in the MSBR hlgh-temperature reactor
and drain cells, and probably will not be suutable for long-term operation in areas
where the radiation level is extremely high (> 100 R/hr) due to insulation degradation
“and the effects of radiation-induced outgassing of the silicone-insulating materials.
In the MSRE, outgassing produced excessive pressure buildup in organically insulated
- cables that were exposed to high radiation and sealed at the containment penetration
and the in-cell (dlsconnect) ends. Inorganic-insulated leadwire would be preferred
in all high radiation areas in the MSBR.and probably would be mandatory in the
furnace-heated cells. In these cells profective sheathing will be required for all
in-cell thermocouple wiring. Also for use in these cells, disconnect devices must
be developed which will be compatible with the furnace atmosphere and remote
‘maintenance requirements. Multiconductor, mineral-insulated, sheathed-thermocouple
~ cable assemblies probably will be satisfactory for all in-cell leadwire and containment
penetration service, but the major problem will be to develop a satisfactory method of
sealing the ends of the cable. Although it would be more difficult to develop seals
and techniques for installing multiconductor cable through a penetration than for
installing a thermocouple through an individual penetration, the advantages to be
realized from fewer penetrations required for multiconductor cables would more than
| _-|ust|fy the development cost, Other considerations, however, such as maintenance
requirements and separation of safety system channels could influence the decision
toward use of individual penetratnons, . Both methods need to be studied and evaluated
in greater detall
The thermocouple attachment technlques used for the MSRE probably will be
_, sqtlsfactory for the MSBR, although they were sometimes time consuming and costly..
~~ Small improvements in these techniques.could yield sugmflcant dividends, because a
~_lorge number of thermocouples wall be requ u‘ed (over 1000 were. mstolled on the
o MSRE).
Infrared photographlc and rqdlatlon pyrometry devuces mlght enable mappmg
_7: "'of temperature contours of . large exposed surfoces (such as the MSBR reactor vessel),
possibly by use of a closed-tircuit television camera equipped with an infrared filter.
~ Sucha temperature profile might be determined more accurately by mechanically
| maneuvermg a radiation pyromefer to produce a scan pattern similar to the raster -
~ produced on a television scréen. Since the feasibility of these devices would be
- . strongly dependent on the physical geometry of the system viewed and of the sur-
‘rounding area, an investigation of their fecmb:hty and the deve lopment of equipment
- and techniques should be initiated early in the program. Pyrometric devices whose
design is based on usinig the preceding principles are commercnally available, and
they may be adaptable to MSBR needs.
8
~ Ultrasonic devices have been applied recently to measure temperature, and
some devices are now available commercially. Although we have not determined
the need for such devices in the MSBR, they might be usable for special applications,
such as measurement of in-core temperatures. The LMFBR Thermomerry Program also
includes investigation of ultrasonic sensors.
4. PRESSURE MEASUREMENT
Measurement of pressures in systems not containing molten salfs or hlghly
redioactive fluids will not present significant problems. In systems containing
molten salts some pressures might be indirectly measurable with MSRE techniques
* and others might be directly measurable with NaK-filled transmitters. However,
no pressure measuring device is available that is suitable in its present form for .
dlrectly mecrsurmg pressures (or dlfferenhal pressures) of fhe fuel salt. o
In the MSRE molfen-salf Ioops the pressures were defermmed mdlrecfly by
measuring the pressures in gos=purge or supply lines connected to gas spaces in the
“drain tanks and pump bowls. This technique will not be usable in the MSBR where
- gas purges cannot be tolerated or where high-frequency response is required.
Additional work would be required to develop a means of directly measuring salt
pressures, since part, or all, of the pressure measuring device would have to be
located close to the pressure tap. within the containment vessel and, thus, the
device would have to withstand the effects of high temperature, radiation and a varying
ambient pressure. In particular, if the reactor and appurtenances are to be heated
~in a furnace, then all pressure transmitter components must be located outside the
heated zone or be capable of operating ot the high cell temperatures.
NaK-filled pressure transmitters offer the best prospects for direct measurement
of cover gas or fluid pressures in molten-salt systems. If this device is to be used, the
possibility that a small amount of NaK would enter the system if the seal diaphragm
breaks must be acceptable. Additional work will be required to reduce the effects of
process temperature on the transmitted signal, to measure pressures > 50 psig at > 1200°F,
and, if the transmitting element is to be installed outside the secondary containment,
to ensure adequate containment of the reactor system. If the transmitting element is
- to be installed inside the secondary containment, the element must be improved to reduce
the environmental effects of temperature, radiation, and varying ambient pressure to
acceptable levels.
Another, but less promising, way to measure pressure directly is to 'possfbly
adapt a thermionic diode type of pressure transmitter.® This method is being developed
8 A..J. Cassano and R. E. Engdahl, "Pressure Transducer for,:LiquidrMeral
Application," pp. 165-186, Proc. Conf. Application of High-Temperature
Instruments to Liquid Metals Experiments, Sept. 28-29, 1965, ANL-7100.
w
9
by others for use in high-temperature quu id=-metal systems, and its progress will
be followed to determine whether it can be applied to molten=salt systems.
5. DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT
As in measurement of pressures, the measurement of differential pressures
~in the MSBR will be more difficult in the systems containing molten salt and
highly redioactive liquids and gases,
| Except for the coolanf—solt venturi pressure drop meosuremenf (Secr 6),
no direct differential pressure ‘measurements were made in salt-containing
_equipment of the MSRE. The differential pressure measurements needed to
determine molten-salt levels and gas flow rates to and from the molten-salt
systems were made on gos lines connected to gas spaces cbove the salt, The
performance of the differentlal pressure transmitters for measuring ges flow was
satisfactory. Some difficulties were experienced in measuring salt flow rates with
~ the NoK~-filled differential pressure cells during initial operations of the MSRE. 7
The performance of some of these transmitters was satisfactory, but that of others:
~was not, and procurement of oll fronsmurrers was difficult,
The problems ossocroted with direct measurement of dtfferenflol pressures
in the liquid-filled equipment of the MSBR salt sysrems are similar to those associ="
ated with pressure measurement (Sect. 4); the main difference is that the differential
pressure transmitter is not affected by variations in embient pressure and usually is
required to megsure much smaller variations in pressures. In applications such as
level measurements, where relatively small spans might be required, the effects of
variations of ambient temperature, process remperoture, and process pressure on
the span and zero of the transmitter are of prime importance and could be the decid-
ing factor In determining the sultability of NaK-filled differential pressure trans-
mitters for o given application. . If the performance of the transmitters were to be -
| improved sufficiently by further development, measurement of level in the drain tanks
- might be considered as an acceptable alternative to weighing.. Another, less
‘promising approach to direct measurement of differential pressures in molten-salt systems
Is to use thermionic diode l’ype elements presently bemg developed by ofhers for I-he
B : 'hqmd metols progroms e
7 Molten-Solf Reactor Progrem Semlonnuol Progress Report for Perlod Endmg |
,August3| i 35 ORNL-3872, p /0.
10
6. FLOW MEASUREMENT
Measurement of a variety of flow rates will be required in the MSBR.
Most will be conventional measurements of liquid, steam, and gas flows in areas
outside the fuel processing and reactor containments. Little development will be
required in these applications. However, further development will be needed
to obtain satisfactory measurements of salt and off-gas flows. The fuel-salt
processing system may also present some special flow measurement problems.
The flow rate of molten salt in the MSRE coolant-salt system was measured
by a venturi meter section operated at system temperature; the differential pressure
was measured by a high-temperature, NaK-filled differential pressure transmitter.
The performance was adequate, and this type of system probably would be acceptable
for similar service on the MSBR .~ This system was not acceptable for measurement
~of MSRE fuel salt flows, because there was a possibility that NaK could be released
into the fuel-bearing salt and possibly precipitate the uranium. This consideration -
might not apply to the MSBR, because the volume of NaK is very small compared with
the volume of salt. Development would also be required for the venturi, NaK=Ffilled
D/P transmitter system for measurement of fuel-salt flow in the MSBR, as menhoned
above,
Ultrasonic techniques offer promise for molten-salt flow measurement. A
commercially available ultrasonic flowmeter is capable of measuring liquid flows
in pipes from 1 to 6 in. in diameter. Since this instrument makes use of piezo-
electric transducers, it probably will be necessary to use force-insensitive mount
techniques (developed by Aeroprojects, Inc., and used in the level probe of the
MSRE fuel storage tank) to allow the heat and rodiation=sensitive components to be
installed outside the reactor containment and shielding. Such a flowmeter could
operate at temperatures > 1300°F and would be compatible with the environmental
conditions. It would be of all-welded construction and would not require an
electrical or piping penetration into the meter body or the containment vessel.
Other devices considered for measurement of molten-salt flow are the turbine
and magnetic type flowmeters. Both types can be constructed for high temperature -
service and have been used in liquid-metal systems with varying degrees of success.
Neither type has been applied to molten-salt service to date; however. The nuclear
magnetic resonance type flowmeter might be applicable in the MSBR system and
should be investigated. A turbine flowmeter developed for the ANP program
operated satisfactorily at 1600°F for a short period before it failed. The major
problem with this flowmeter is that the physical properties of the turbine blade
and bearing materials must- withstand high temperatures. Perhaps the improved
materials now available and lower operating temperature proposed for this service
would permit development of a flowmeter of this type for MSBR service.
O
.yt
C’
1
Magnetic flowmeters have been used extensively at high temperatures
(1600°F) in liquid-metal systems and af lower temperatures for the measurement of the
flow of many fluids over a fairly wide range of rates. But this type of flowmeter
cannot be used for measurement of molten-salt flows in its present form because
of consideration of containment, materials compatibility, and molten-salt
conductivity, as follows: containment and material compatibility prevent use of
~ electrical lead-through penetrations of the meter body such as those used in con-
ventional magnetic flowmeter construction; and the relatively poor (1 mho/cm) -
conductivity of the moli‘en salt prevents measurement of the signal voltage at the
ovtside surface of the meter body, as is.accomplished with liquid-metal flowmeters.
If satisfactory electrical lead-through penetrations could be devised, then magnetic
flowmeters for molten=salt service regardless of salt conductivity could be developed.
There is o good possibility that such a penetration could be developed by protecting
a nearly insoluble insulator material, such s beryllmm oxide, with a frozen-solf
film or plug. - - |
7. LEVEL MEASUREMENT
Several mei'hods were used successfully for smgle-pomf and continuous
mecsurement of molten-salt levels in the MSRE system. All these methods could -
be used in the MSBR under sumllar condlhons, although oll hove certain limitations.
Molten—sclf levels in the MSRE coolant and fuel-solt pump bowls were
measured continuously by bubbler (dip tube) and float level systems. A develop-
mental pump installation included a float level transmitter. Two-level, single-"
point measurements of molten=salt level in the MSRE fuel and coolant system drain
tank were made by conductivity level probes. With the information obtained
from these probes, the performance and calibration of the tank weighing systems
were checked. The probe signals operated lamps (and other binary devices) that
indicated whether the level was above or below two preselected points. An ultra-
- sonic probe was used for smgle-pomt measurement of level in the fuel storage
~tank. Except that it is a "one-level" device, the information obtained with
~ the ultrasonic probe is identical to that obtained with the conduchvn'y probe, and
information from both probes was used for fhe same purpose.
AII of fhe sysfems for meosuremenf of molten-solt Ievel in the MSRE were
| developed for a particular service, and further developmenf or redesign would be
. required for other oppll_oohoos.r The bubbler systenf is the simplest and the most
& Molten=Salt Reocfor Progrom Semlonnuol Progress Report for Period Ending
Jan. 31,7963, ORNL-34T9, p. 43.
12
versatile method of measuring molten=-salt level under relatively static
conditions of level and cover-gas pressure. This system can be used for narrow
or wide ranges of levels, and the vessel modifications required to install the system
are simple and inexpensive.. However, since: performance of the bubbler system
depends on a steady flow of purge gas through a dip tube, this system can be
used only where the purge gas'can be tolerated. Also, the response characteristics
of this system depend on the purge flow rate which, in turn, depends on the supply
pressure, cover-gas pressure, and other factors. In general, the low purge rate -
required for accurate measurement is not compatible with requirements for fast =~
response. Fast changes of cover-gas pressure, such as can occur in the drain tanks
and pump bowl during filling and draining operations, can make the system inopera-
tive unless there are corresponding changes in the flow rate of the purge gas: A"
disudvantcge of the bubbler technique for measurement of levels in systems confam-
ing radioactive fluids is that it is necessary to detect and prevent a release of
activity through the purge line. Development of a system that would recycle the :
purge gas within primary and secondary containments would greatly extend the
usefulness of bubbler systems,
The float level system® offers the best method of continuous measurement of
molten-salt levels over narrow ranges. Such a device would be completely con-
tained, have a fast response, and require only electrical penetrations into the
secondary containment. Present designs are limited to measurement spans <10 in.
Although the span probably can be increased, this device is better suited to - - -
low-span than to hngh-—span measurements.
The conduchv:ty level prob performed well in MSRE service. ‘Except
that redesign of the tank penetration might be necessary to improve containment .
and to withstand high temperature ambient conditions in furnace heated areas, = =
the present probe design could be adapted to installation in MSBR tanks. Adis-=
odvantage of this probe is that the walls of the tube extending into the tank must -
be thin, which makes the tubing unsultable in corrosive environments. Since the
output signal obtained from the MSRE conductivity probes was much greater than
expected, possibly a more rugged and corrosion-resistant single-point probe with
a thicker tube wall could be developed. A continuous-type conductivity probe
similar to those used in liquid-metal systems also has possibilities.
® MSRE Design and Operations Report, Nuclear and Process Insfrumenfatlon ’
ORNL-TM-729, part IIB, Sect. 6.9 (in preparation).
1°1bid., Sect. 6.10.
C.
.}
.
«d
13
Recent dafa on the conduchvnty of molten scnlfs11 have led to a better
understanding of the mechamsms that influence the measurement of molten-salt
- conductivities and to a possible explanation of the drift characteristics that
have deterred development of conductivity probes for application to continuous
measurement of molten-salt levels. These data indicate that it might be possible
to reduce the drift rates of present developmental designs to acceptable levels
| by usmg a l‘ngher excttahon frequency and phcse defechon fechmques.
Except for some problems wafh oscnllafor frequency drlft fhe Aeroprolecfs,
Inc., ultrasonic level probe! ? hds been dependable and accurate. Development -
will be required to improve the main chassis electronics and packaging, and routine
redesign and development testing should be sufficient to resolve the remaining’
'problems. The Aeroprojects single=point ultrasonic level probe is more rugged and
corrosion resistant than the conductivity type probe, and, when the remaining
problems are solved, this could be the preferred device for smgle-pomt level
measurement in msfclllahons where it s ‘applicable.
Level measuremeni' by a dlffereni'lal hecd-pressure method was noi' used in
_ ‘fhe MSRE because a suitable device for measuring differential pressure was not
_available. As discussed previously, if the performance of low-span, NaK-filled,
differential pressure transmitters could be improved, this dewce could be consudered
for the MSBR. - | _. o
With the possable excephon of i'he dlfferenhal (head) pressure mei'hod all
methods previously discussed would be compatible with the MSBR design concept
of furnace heating the reactor and drain tank cells. The float-type level trans~
mitter should be given great consideration, because its transformer and other
| parts could operate at the proposed MSBR sysfem temperatures. Poss:bly, the con-
ductivity and vltrasonic probes could be used in a furnace atmosphere in their
~ present form; however, some additional development work on leadwire, penetrations,
~ and disconnects will probably be needed. The effects of temperature on the
transmission line characteristics of the- ultrasomc level system must be investigated
- before furfher cons:derahon <an be gwen to use. of fhns system in. furnace-heated
| _areus. - B S -
o8 SA'L'T'.'-INVENTORYM.EAS‘UREMENT i
Measuremenf of the amounf of salt in various: MSBR systems wnll be requured
o 'bofh durmg operuhon and shutdown, because this informahon wull be necessqry
. 11G.D. Robbms, Electrical Conduchvufy of Molfen Fluorrdes, A Rev:ew,
_.oRNL-TM-zlso (March 26, T9¢8).
12 MSRE Design and Operahons Reporl' Nucleur and Process Insh'umentahon,
| ORNL-TM-729 part IIB, Sect. 6.11 (in preparation).
14
for calculating reactivity and for accounting for the amount and location of
fissionable materials. Information obtained from lnvenfory lnstrumentchon will -
also be valuuble and necesscry aid to operahon. | S
The molten salt in the MSRE dram and storage tanks wes inventoried by
pneumatic weighing systems. These systems use diaphragm-type cells and cutomatic
force-balance (negative feedback) principles of operation. Except for special piping
connections that permitted operation under varying subatmospheric environmental
pressures, the: wenghmg systems were standard commercial items.. This 's'ystem is not
aoffected by radiation, is insensitive to varying ambient pressure, and is relchvely
~ insensitive to varying ambient temperature at < 150°F. The basic principle of -opera-
tion and method of installation of this system are such that its sensitivity and span
‘calibration can be checked during reactor operation at a control panel outside the
containment and the biological shields. A disadvantage of the system is that it
requires several pneumatic tubing penetrations of the containment, and these rust
be guarded by safety block valves. Except for some difficulties with drift of the
zero sefting, which were probably due to changes in pipe loading, and with some
peripheral equipment, the performance of the MSRE systems was acceptable. Although
the measurement accuracy of weighing systems might be lessened by shifts of the zero
setting due to pipe loading, the weighing system offers the best possibility for accurate
determination of MSER salt inventory where env:ronmenfal conditions and fotal tank
weights permit its use. . :
-Tank inventories could also be determined by measurement of level,
ulfhough this measurement requires correction for tank geometry and salt density.
Also, as discussed previously, odditional level system development would be
required unless measurements of tank inventories are to be made under static
pressure conditions and a continuous gas purge into the tanks can be tolerated. It
is possible that a combination of level and weight measurements will be required
to obtain a total salt inventory. Present indications are that the tare and live
loads of the main MSBR drain tanks and the ambient temperatures in the cells
in which these tanks are to be installed will preclude use of fhe MSRE system for
measurement of salt inventories in these tanks.’ : |
The pneumatic weigh cells used in the MSRE were the largest that were
commercially available at the time. Larger cell capacities are possible, but a
considerable amount of redesign and developmental testing would be required to
obtain significant increases in individual cell capacity. Although a number of
"brute force" design techniques, such as beam balance systems of multiple cells
with mechanical averaging, could be used to obtain large weighing capacities,
considerations of space and cost may preclude their use. Also, the 150°F maximum
temperature rating of the pneumatic weigh cells prevents their use at the 2 1000°F
ambient temperatures which may be present in the MSBR drain tank cell. One weigh
sysfem by a Swedish company shows considerable promise. The load cell in this system
is essentially a fransformer that makes use of the magnetic anisotropy in a magnetic
wi
np’?
w/ d
15
material under mechanical stress, The desirable features of the cell include its
high load capacity, electrical output, solid-state structure, low output impedance,
low sensitivity to temperature effects, and high output signal. Although the standard
model load cell is not suitable for extended service in high level radiation or high
temperature (1200°F) environments, information is available that. indicates that
.adequate radiation resistance could probably be obtained by replacement of organic
electrical insulation materials with inorganic materials. The moximum operating
temperature might be sahsfocforlly extended by air coolmg the load cells.
Another promlsmg techmque is the use of a NaK—fllled load cell. Oil- and
mercury-fulled hydraulic systems having high load capacity and accuracy are
commercmlly available . Substitution of NaK for oil should permit operation of the
primary load cell at 1200°F In this system, weight would be converted to NaK
pressure, which would be transmitted via a capillary tube to a transducer located in
g more hospltoble envaronment.
One possuble desugn would be to mstall vessel suspensuon rods through the
containment overhead with bellows seals to weigh cells located above the biological
shielding. Although this design would permit use of a variety of basic weighing
systems, it would, however, introduce serious structural, operational, and mainten-
ance problems. A variation would be to weigh a side tank rather than the entire
tank, thereby easing the problem of load cell capacity. However, this variation
would require removal of afterheat from the side tank and elimination of extraneous
loads produced by stresses in piping connecting the side tank to the main tank.
9. CONTAINMENT PENETRATION SEALS
Electrical power and instrument signals were carried into MSRE containment
by (1) mineral-insulated cables; (2) sheathed, glass-insulated, silicone~impregnated
multiconductor cables with soldered hermetic seals inside the cell and with organic
seals outside the cell; and (3) hermehcclly sealed connectors welded to the contain-
- ment vessels. Seals were required on these cables at both ends and at the point of
~ penetration fo prevent escape of radioactive gases and particulates and to exclude
moisture from the cables. Labor costs to install these seals were high. The performance
of these seals was marginal. -Development of new techniques will probably be required
in the MSBR for furnace=heated containment areas. Extensive seal development will
be required unless seals can be installed in a cool area. A seal different from that
ysed in the MSRE will be required for thermocouple penetrations because the MSRE
leadwire cable will not withstand the temperatures of furnace-heated cells.
16
10. GAS-SYSTEM CONTROL VALVES
Helium-purge flow and cover-gas pressures in the MSRE were controlled by
throttling valves. Due to the low flow rates and pressure drops, the clearances in
“these valves were extremely small. These small clearances together with poor lubri-
cation resulting from dry helium service and limitations imposed on the type and
amount of lubricant that could be used were the apparent causes of trim galling that
caused many of the valves to fail. The valve assembly procedures were improved, but
additional work is needed to develop better valves for confrollmg small helium flows.
The MSRE operating experience ind icated a need for a suntable means of
- controlling very low flow rates of helium contaminated with particulates and hydro-
carbons. It is evident that similar conditions will exist in the' MSBR and that |
conventional valves and flow elements will clog and stick in such service. Three
lines of attack are suggested: (1) eliminate the contaminants, (2) develop special
“valves, and (3) develop other (and probably unorthodox) methods of controllmg Iow
flow rates of dirty helium. | - -
gl
o
“87. M. T.Kelley
17
82.
ORNL-TM-3303
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION .
1-2, MSRP Director's Offlce - 38..J. J. Keyes
3. R. K. Adoms 39. A. I. Krakoviak
4. A. H. Anderson 40. J. W. Krewson
5. J. L. Anderson 41, M. L. Lundin
6. C. F. Baes 42. R. N. Lyon
7. S. E. Beall 43, H. G. MacPherson
8. M. Bender 44. R. E. MacPherson
9. E. S, Betts 45. H. E. McCoy
10. D, S. Billington 46. L. E. McNeese
11. E. G. Bohlmenn 47, J. R. McWherter
12, C. J. Borkowski 48. H. J. Metz
13. G, E. Boyd 49. A. S. Meyer
14. C. Brashear 50-55. R. L. Moore
15. R. B. Briggs 56. C. A. Mossman
16. R. H. Chapman 57. E. L. Nicholson
17. F. L. Culler 58. L. C. Oakes
18. J. W. Cunninghem 59. A. M. Perry
19. D. G. Davis 60. J. L. Redford
20. J. R. Distefano 61. R. C. Robertson
21. S. J. Ditto é2. D. P. Roux
22, W. P. Eatherly 63, Dunlap Scott
23. J. R, Engel 64, W. H. Sides
24, D. E. Ferguson 65. M. J. Skinner
25. L. M., Ferris 66. 1, Spiewak
26. J. H. Frye o 67. J, R, Tallackson
27, G.W, Greene = 68, R. E. Thoma