-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
ORNL-TM-5782.txt
1119 lines (631 loc) · 22.6 KB
/
ORNL-TM-5782.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
G
M
n
a
.
I
|
) ———————
o= . 7
= m £Fy W &
o Smeretstt— i
00 F——et— & ;
—1 SRR
& a— o0
-~ e 3
& e N
i==
= 0
==
= S w0
= =r
xs
2 m
i Ch - i D e
e U?“:itm} \;»ta‘tes u? Am%n'\,a Avaitaoie from
"\
Y e
SVICS
;i@%d Virgima 221671
O P S~ - 4 L. g KL n 3
Price. Printed Copy $4 06, Muicrofiche $3.00
This 7 ep 1t was orgpared as an account of waork Q’)CflSOfes‘j oy the Urniteg Siates
Governm cither the United States nor the Dnergy Hasearch and Developmend
Admmiinistration/United States Nuclear Fogulatory Commission nor any of iher
employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, oo ther emplovess, makes
any warranty, express orimphied, or assumes afl\/1893”!&1{}1;!{)’0(:"i‘:‘spOHS‘b!My fortnhe
accuracy, compiateness or useltulnoss of any information apparatus pmduct 01
proce5° dISC'OS\,d or represents that its use would naot '
ORNL/TM~-5782
Contract No. W-7405-eng~26
METALS AND CERAMICS DIVISION
The Corrosion Resistance of Type 316 Stainless Steel to LijzBeFy
J. R. Keiser, J. H. DeVan, and D. L. Manning
Date Published -~ April 1977
NOTICE This document contains information of a preliminary nature,
it is subject to revisiotvor-correction and therefore does not represent a
final report.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
operated by
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
for the
ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
OAK RIDGE NATICNAL LABORATORY LIBRARIES
AR
3 4456 0551078 3
ABSTRACT . .
INTRODUCTION .
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
-
®
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iidi
THE CORROSTION RESTISTANCE OF TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL TO Li,BeF,
J. R. Keiser, J. H. DeVan, and D. L. Marming1
ABSTRACT
The corrosion rate of type 316 stainless steel in
molten LiF-BeF, (66-34 mole %) has been measured in a thermal-
convection loop operating with a maximum temperature of 650°C
and a temperature difference of 160°C. The corrosion rate
was correlated with the concentration of impurities in
the salt and with the fluoride ion oxidation potential as
determined by an on-line voltameter.
A corrosion rate of —10 um/year was observed initially
in the as-received salt. This rate decreased as reactions
with initial salt impurities went to completion. Direct
addition of beryllium metal to the salt further reduced the
corrosion rate.
INTRODUCTION
The selection of the‘first»wall and blanket materials for the first-
generation TOKAMAK-type magnetic fusion reactors will bépdetermined by
a combination of neutronic, radiation damage, and chemical requirements.
The technological problems associated with fabrlcatlon, weldlng, and
adequate production of the refractory metals nloblum, vanadlum, dnd
molybdenum have resulted in type 316 stainless steel being glven strong
con51derat10n for the fusion reactor first-wall material. The choices
for a blanket capable of breedlng tritium are limited to llthlum or
a lithium-bearing compound, but‘this blanket material must also be
chemically compatible with theyfiist wall. Because the extent of corro-
sion of stainless steel by liquid lithium may impose a severe temperature
limit, strong consideration is being given to the use of a mixture of
1'Analytical Chemistry Division.
the salts LiF and BeF, for a blanket of a fusion reactor with a stainless
steel first wall. The purpose of this paper is to report on the corrosion
resistance of type 316 stainless steel to LijsBeF,.
There are potential problems associated with the use of LiF-BeF»
as a combined coolant-breeding material.? These include the effective
breeding and the efficient recovery of tritium, the effect on the salt
of induced electric fields and of transmutation products, and the compati-
bility of the salt with the component it contacts. The tritium breeding
ratio of this salt is not as high as is that of lithium, and some designs
would probably require the addition of a mneutron multiplier such as
beryllium.
Another problem could be the electric field induced in the conducting
salt when it flows through the intense magnetic fields required for plasma
containment. This potential difference occurring between the salt and
the pipe wall could be great enough to electrolyze the salt and thus
cause severe corrosion problems for the metallic container. Means of
reducing the effect of the induced field to a tolerable level have been
3 According to him, electrolytic corrosion could
suggested by Homeyer.
be minimized by avoiding, as much as possible, high fluid velocities
perpendicular to the magnetic field. Solution of this problem will
most probably have to be a result of engineering design changes rather
than through additions or modifications to the salt.
An additional concern will be the corrosive effect of the salt on
the stainless steel. As seen from the free energies of formation in
Table 1, LiF and BeF,; are much more stable than the fluorides of the
major constituents of stainless steel, Fe, Ni, and Cr. Consequently,
no significant reaction of the salt components with the metallic container
is expected; however, impurities in the salt may cause corrosion. Impuri-
ties expected to be present are HF and NiF,, and these will cause
reactions of the type:
’W. R. Grimes and Stanley Carter, "Molten Salt Blanket Fluids in
Controlled Fusion Reactors." pp. 16190 in The Chemistry of Fusion
Technology D. M. Gruen, ed. Plenan Press, New York, 1972.
W. G. Homeyer, "Thermal and Chemical Aspects of the Thermomiclear
Blanket Problem," Technical Report 435, M. I. T. Research Laboratory of
Electronics (1965).
Table 1. Formation Free Energy of Fluoride at 1000 K
Free Energy per Gram—~Atom of Fluorine~
Compound
(kJ) (kecal)
LiF —523 —125
BeF, —~448 —107
UF, 410 98
CrF, =314 ~75
FeF, ~280 ~67
HF —276 ‘~66
NiF, 230 —55
MoF¢ ~209 ~50
4c. F. Baes, Jr., "The Chemistry and Thermo-
dynamics of Molten Salt Reactor Fuels," Nucl. Met.
15, 624, P. Chiott; Ed., CONF-690801 (1969).
2 HF + M = Hy, + MF,, where M could be Fe or Cr ; (1)
MF, + Cr ¥ M + CrF, where M could be Ni or Fe . ‘ (2)
These reactions of impurities with the container will occur at a high
rate initially but will slow down as the impurities are consumed. As
long as no additional impurities are added to the system, after the first
few hundred hours these initial reactions are not expected to contribute
significantly to corrosion. The addition of a reductant to the salt could
eliminate the corrosive effects of the impurities by the reductant rather
than the wall reacting with the impurities. The transmutation products
formed by neutron reaction with the salt represent another significant
source of oxidants in the salt. All three elemental constituents of the
salt — lithium, beryllium, and fluorine — are expected to undergo trans-
mutation reactions.
The reactions of lithium,
3 -~
"LiF + n > He + |HF + n (3)
and
3
*Li¥ + n » He + [ HF , (4)
are, of course, desired because this is the means of producing the
tritium fuel. However, the TF produced can react with the stainless
steel container to form metals fluorides as shown in Eq. (1).
Transmutation of beryllium can occur in either of two ways:
4
BeF, + n » 2n + 2 ,He + 2F (5)
or
y 6
BeF, + n + ,He + He + 2F . (6)
6
The ,He undergoes beta decay with an 0.8-sec half-life yielding for the
right side of Equation 6,
y 61 0 .
2He + "LiF + F
The fluorine produced in these beryllium transmutation reactions
can react with the stainless steel container, constituting another
source of corrosion.
The other transmutation of the salt componenis is that of fluorine:
19 16 .. 4
F +#n-> N + ,He . (7)
7
16~
The 7N undergoes beta decay with about a 7-sec half-life yielding 16O,
which can be expected to react with the containment metal causing addi-
tional corrosion. The net result of all three transmutation reactions
is the production of substances that will cause corrosion of the stainless
steel containment alloy. The extent of this corrosion would be very
significant and possibly intolerable. One means of at least reducing
and perhaps of eliminating this corrosion is to add a redoi buffer to
the salt. This buffer would need to be capable of (1) reducing the
TF to T, and a soluble fluoride, (2) reacting with the fluorine to
form a'stable, soluble fluoride, and (3) forming a stable oxide that
dissolves in salt and can be processed out of the salt.
One other problem associated with the use of Li;BeF, is the recovery
of tritium from the salt, The redox buffer required to keep the tritium
in the form of T, because of the corrosivity of TF with stainless steel
will probably make it easier to remove the tritium fromjthe salt.,
The potential problems associated with impurities, transmutation
products, and tritium recovery will almost certainly require a redox
buffer if a Li,BeFy, blanket is to be used with a stainless steel contain~
ment vessel. A great deal of experience with molten salt containing a
redox buffer has been accumulated at ORNL as a result of work for the
“ The fuel salt for this reactor
Molten Salt Breeder Reactor Program.
is composed of LiF and BeF, to which the fertile material ThF, and
fissile material UFy have been added. Because of reactions that occur
during both preparation and holding in the containment vessel, the
uranium is actually found to be present in both the three and four plus
oxidation states (UF; and UFy). Together these compounds make up
0.3 mole % of the fuel salt. This amount of material is sufficient to
ensure that addition of an oxidizing or reducing impurity to the salt
does not cause serious corrosion of many containment vessel materials.
Addition of an oxidizing impurity results in some U(III) being oxidized
to U(IV) and, conversely, addition of a reducing impurity results in
reduction of U(IV) to U(III). Consequently, a small change in the
U(IV)/U(I11) ratio might occur, but because of this buffering action,
no drastic swings in the oxidation potential will take place.
The choice of a redox buffer for Li,BeF, in stainless steel will
depend on how "reducing' it is necessary to make the salt. One material
“J. W. Roger, Alloy Compatibility with LiF-BeF, Salts Containing
ThFy and UFy, ORNL/TM~4286, (December 1972).
that could make the salt sufficiently "reducing" to practically
eliminate the corrosion caused by impurities and transmutation products
is beryllium. Typical reactions could be:
Be + FeF, > Fe + BeF, , (8)
Be + 2HF - H, + BelF, , (9)
Be + 2F - BeF, . (10)
To determine the suitability of stainless steel for containing Li,BeF,,
corrosion measurements have been made with salt in the as-received
condition and in the reducing condition reached by adding beryllium to
it.
EXPERTMENTAL METHODS
The experimental assembly used for this corrosion work, called
a thermal-convection loop, is shown in Fig. 1. The loop portion of
the assembly is constructed of type 316 stainless steel tubing and
is heated on the bottom and one verticle side. Cooling the other two
sides causes the molten salt in the tubing to flow because of the
variation in density of the salt with temperature. The velocity of
the salt is about 1 m/min. Other important features of the loop are
the removable corrosion specimens and the accesses for insertion of
electrodes for voltammetry measurements and for addition of material
to the salt in the loop or removal of salt samples from the loop.
Sixteen corrosion specimens are used, with eight inserted in the hot
leg (heated vertical section) and eight in the cold leg (cooled
verticle section). These specimens are removed from the loop every
500 hr for weighing and examination. When the investigations to be
made with a particular set of specimens are completed, several of the
specimens are examined metallographically and, if warranted, with the
electron microprobe. These results reveal at which temperature weight
ORNL~-DWG 68-398TR3
|
i T NN
BALL VALVES
o ,L""":"Ebw‘
(2T TN
g - 3
N IR YRR -
7
e
»
- ‘\>>~CLAMSHELL
- HEATERS
=
30i
3
AANSULATION
e _;_;_‘\_
i
INCHES
1 \FREEZE
1 VALVES
FLUSH
TANK
oo x, T ¥ e T
o —~ =% - F oo o - %
B o e
=)
R
|
E»
P
]
Eo oo
SAMPLER
g
i
DUMP
TANK
Fig. 1. Schematic of Thermal-Convection
Loop.
shown is Q.76 m.
Scale length is 0.15 m.
Height
gains or losses have occurred, and the microprobe examination identifies
which components of the specimen material have been itransported.
One of the most significant improvements in thermal-convection
loop operation has been the application of voltammetry. Controlled-
potential voltammetry is a modern electrochemical technique, which
may be used to examine the nature of an electrochemical reaction in
different media, such as aqueous and nonaqueous solutions and high-
temperature salt systems. For measurements in molten Li,BeF,, the
electrodes consisted of the loop itself, which served as the counter
electrode, and two iridium electrodes, which were the quasi-reference
and working electrodes. These electrodes were typically 25-mm (1-in.)
lengths of 18-gage iridium wires welded to 3-mm~OD (1/8-in.) nickel
risers. The electrode area exposed to the melt was 10 to 20 mm?. The
voltammograms were recorded versus the iridium quasi-reference electrode
(Ir QRE), which is poised at the equilibrium potential (Eeq) of the
melt. In this manner relative changes in the oxidation potential of
the salt and of the concentration of certain impurities and corrosion
products can be measured on-line. The equilibrium potential of the
salt is a measure of the tendency of the melt to react with oxidizable
materials that it contacts. For melts that are not poised by a redox
buffer relative changes in the equilibrium potential are conveniently
observed by determining voltammetrically the potential difference (AF)
between the melt equilibrium potential and the cathodic limit of the
melt, which for LizBeF, is the reduction of beryllium(II). We define
the cathodic limit for these measurements as the potential at 80 mA
cell current. Other reference markers may also be used as long as the
same conditions are maintained. A decrease in AF, resulting in a
cathodic shift in Eeq for example, indicates that the melt has become
less oxidizing; and an increase in AF indicates that the opposite has
occurred, A voltammetric scan that shows the cathodic limit relative
to Eoq is illustrated in Fig. 2.
ORNL-DWG 77~3824
- AE -
80
60
<
E
}...
Z
& 40
@
-
o
20
A
o —
0 -0.2 -0.4 -06 -0.8 -1.0 -2
VOLTAGE (V)
Fig. 2. Voltammetric Scan to Final Limit of
Lio,BeF, in Loop NCL 31.
The reduction of Fe?t and cr?t impurities is illustrated by the
voltammogram shown in Fig. 3.
correspond to about 130 ppm Fe?¥ and 100 PPM cr2t,
The peak heights of the two waves
Fig. 4 shows the
results of a voltammetric scan made several weeks after that of Fig. 3.
The peak due to iron has disappeared, while the chromium peak is about
the same height. It is also interesting to note that the melt has
become less oxidizing as indicated by the cathodic shift in Eeq relative
to the peak potential of the chromium wave. The good agreement between
the voltammetric results and the results of the analyses of salt samples
indicates the usefulness of controlled-potential voltammetry for rapid
in situ measurements.
CURRENT {mA)
CURRENT (mA)
10
ORNL-DWG 77-8367
4 2+ o
Foo + 26~ Fe Cr + 28— Cr
~0.2 -0.4 ~0.6
APPLIED POTENTIAL (V)
Fig. 3. Reduction of Iromn and Chromium in Loop NCL 31.
ORNL-DWG 77-5368
+ 0.2 0O - .2
APPLIED POTENTIAL (V)
Fig. 4. Reduction of Chromium in Loop NCL 31.
11
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Type 316 stainless steel specimens were first exposed in the
type 316 stainless steel thermal-convection loop containing as-received
Li,BeF, salt with a high impurity level (190 ppm Fe, 60 ppm Cr). The
circulating salt had a maximum temperature of 650°C and a minimum of
490°C. The specimens were examined after 500 and 1000 hr, and the
condition of the salt was monitored by means of voltammetry and salt
samples. Following this initial exposure, a beryllium rod was lowered
into the salt and a new set of type 316 stainless steel specimens was
inserted. These specimens were examined after 500, 1000, 1500, and
2000 hr in the salt. Meanwhile, monitoring of the condition of the
salt was continued.
Examination of the specimens after the first 500-hr exposure
showed that significant weight changes had occurred, most likely
because of reactions with impurities. Figure 5 shows the weight change
results for specimens near the highest and lowest temperatures. The
Y-137150
30 ORNL-DWG 76-3496
51020 -
20
® A5 RECEIVED" SALT
X AFTER BE ADDITION
!il!!ifti?t!
S10°C
WEIGHT CHANGE (mg)
850°C
i!ilii!t'ii
Q i 800 1060 1500 2000
EXPOSURE. TIME (ho)
Flg 5. Welght Change Results for Type 316 Stalnless Steel
Specimens Exposed to LiF-BeF; Salt in Both the As- Received ‘Relatively
Oxidizing Condition and in the Relatively Reducing Condition Created
by the Addition of Berylllum to the Salt.
12
weight lost by the hottest specimen during the first 500 hr, if we
assume that the material was lost uniformly from the surface,
corresponds to a corrosion rate of about 10 ym (0.4 mil) per year.
However, in previous work" with stainless steel in fluoride salts
containing UF, as an oxidizing species, corrosion did not result in
uniform removal of material; rather, a porous structure was found
(Fig. 6). The 1000-hr exposure of our specimens was not long enough
for extensive corrosion to occur, but Fig. 7 indicates that material
was not removed uniformly from the hotter specimen. Consequently, the
depth of attack can be expected to exceed that calculated for uniform
material removal. Futhermore, in the salt of a fusion reactor, impuri-
ties would be produced continuously and in significant quantities, and
these impurities would be more oxidizing than the impurities found
in this experimental salt. Thus, corrosion of stainless steel in a
fusion reactor could be a serious problem if no effort is made to
buffer the salt.
Y-~127785
{
i
600 700
{
MICRONS
100 X i
INCHES 0.020
i
0.010
i
100 200
1
Fig. 6. Type 304L Stainless Steel Specimen from Loop 1258
Exposed to LiF-BeF,~-ZrF,-ThF,~UF, (70-23-5-1-1 mole %) for 45,724
hr at 685°C.
13
Y-134722
650°C 510°C
Fig. 7. Type 316 Stainless Steel Specimens Exposed to Li;BeF, for
1004 hr.
To evaluate the effect of a buffer on the corrosion of stainless
steel in Li,BeF,, a piece of beryllium was inserted into the salt and
allowed to react. As shown in Fig. 8, the equilibrium potential shifted
cathodically, indicating the salt was made less oxidizing. Voltammetric
measurements indicated the FeF, concentration to be less than about
20 ppm. A new set of specimens was exposed to this reducing salt for
2000 hr. Examination of the specimens after 500 and 1000 hr showed
very small weight changes, near the limit of detection. As shown in
Fig. 5, the weight changes for the specimen temperatures considered
were much smaller for the specimens in the reducing salt during the
first 1000 hr than in the as~received salt.
Figure 5 shows that once the beryllium was removed from the salt
(during the first 500-hr specimen exposure to the reducing salt), the
specimen in the hottest position showed increasing weight loss as a
function of time. This most probably occurred because, once the source
of beryllium was removed, the species in the salt were no longer in
equilibrium and the salt became progressively more oxidizing. Thus,
to maintain a low correosion rate, beryllium would have to be added
continuously or at least periodically. If that were done the corrosion
rate of type 316 stainless steel in Li,BeF, salt could be kept within
a range acceptable for fusion reactor service.
14
ORNL~DWG 77 -3822
-4.15
®
A
I/
/ ® //
- ®/ ® A e Y
> \ 4 7
é '”‘.05 ® @ /
- p ® «
2
tf ® ,//'
g 1
-{,00 7
g ® ///
3 7
/“/ ®
-0.95 e
“4s
Be ADDITION
-0.90 :
O 20 40 60 80 100
TIME (days)
Fig. 8. Variation of the Limit for Li,BeF,
Salt in NCL 31.
CONCLUSTONS
The conclusions that can be drawn from this research are:
1. The oxidation potential of the salt can be controlled by
additions of a reducing metal.
2. Voltammetric techniques provide on-line measurement of the
oxidation potential of the salt and the concentration of impurities
in the salt.
3. High corrosion rates are encountered initially in salt with
a normal impurity concentration.
4. The corrosion rate of type 316 stainless steel in Li,BeF,
salt was reduced significantly by the direct addition of beryllium
metal to the salt.
15
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to make note of the efforts of E. J. Lawrence
for operating the thermal-convection loop; J. R. DiStefano and J. L. Scott
for reviewing, S. Peterson for editing, and Gail Golliher for final
preparation of the manuscript for reproduction.
15.
17.
18—19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24—26.
27.
70~71.
72.
13—74.
75.
17
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
Central Research Library
Document Reference Section
Laboratory Records Department
Laboratory Records, ORNL RC
ORNL Patent Office
R. G. Alsmiller, Jr.
E. §. Bettis
E. H. Bryant
D. Cannon
J. Clarke
R. E. Clausing
S. D. Clinton
J. E. Cunningham
R. A. Dandl
J. H. DeVan
A. P. Fraas
Fusion Energy Division Library
Fusion Energy Division Reports Office
T. A. Gabriel
M. L. Grossbeck
P. N. Haubenreich
M. R. Hill
J. A. Horak