Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Context #139

Closed
mwitkow opened this issue Dec 20, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Add support for Context #139

mwitkow opened this issue Dec 20, 2016 · 8 comments
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@mwitkow
Copy link

mwitkow commented Dec 20, 2016

With Go 1.7, each http.Request now contains a http.Request.Context. With Go 1.8, database drivers now take Context, allowing to stop backend requests when inbound requests get cancelled.

It would be great to have support for this :)

@vvakame
Copy link

vvakame commented Jan 7, 2018

👀 #82

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 26, 2020
@ptman
Copy link

ptman commented Aug 26, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

What's the status of this project?

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 26, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 24, 2020
@ptman
Copy link

ptman commented Nov 25, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

Is this whole project stale? Is there an active fork?

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 25, 2020
@ptman
Copy link

ptman commented Nov 25, 2020

/lifecycle frozen

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Nov 25, 2020
@stlaz
Copy link
Contributor

stlaz commented Jan 15, 2021

/close
This looks like a clone of #82

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@stlaz: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close
This looks like a clone of #82

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants