-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run promotional campaign #11
Comments
Fwiw we're planning to use the osspledge.com URL on the billboards since it's shorter, it currently redirects to opensourcepledge.com. |
Some companies are going to pledge way more than others. This is especially true because we have some members who only have one developer. Do we want the logos of companies that pledge way more to be way bigger on the billboards? |
I'll let @selviano weigh in but I expect we'll want to also weight logos by recognizability. The main point is to grab people's attention and validate the Pledge as a thing worth investigating and joining. Logos with a lot of brand equity will help the most with that, and honestly smaller companies will benefit from the association as well. |
We've gone through two rounds of concept creation with Sentry's in-house creative team. We are dialing in on a campaign with three variations on the theme of calling out leadership at companies who do not pay maintainers. [wording redacted] |
@chadwhitacre I think it's a great idea to put pressure on companies, but I'm concerned that this wording might be too antagonising and drive away executives who would otherwise contribute, because as soon as they're personally shamed by a movement they might not want to interact with it. Maybe focusing on the financials would be a good approach. For example, NVIDIA probably has around 15,000 developers, and they brought in $33 billion in net income last fiscal year. Making the pledge would cost them $30 million per year, which is 0.00009% of their income. I think that's more shameful than being called names — it's shameful because it's unfair and unwise, and harms the ecosystem they depend on. Every other company is less valuable than NVIDIA, but even if the number was 0.9% it would be shameful and unwise. |
We talked about this on the weekly steering call. @vladh brought up tbfighters.org as an example of an activism campaign with some parallels where the change was driven through a more positive tone.
It does seem here like we wouldn't be shaming specific individuals or companies with this campaign. It's more abstract. Another difference is that this is only for the SF OOH campaign, we're not proposing to carry this campaign through on osspledge.com itself @selviano is just getting back into the swing of things post-vacation, let's see how conversations play out at Sentry internally this week. |
Got it, I think that makes it way better. |
Expectation is assets to Nasdaq by EOD on Oct 1. |
Most logos we can comfortably fit on Nasdaq even w/ NASCAR style is ~15. |
We've got 5 early adopters in process of getting signed up, I think we should be able to get another 5 or 10 beyond that onboarded "pretty quickly" once we resolve #45. |
Conclusions from the digital promo meeting:
|
We have OOH designs! Here are the final drafts of the three SF billboards, featuring what Sentry's creative team is calling "mooch monsters." The bus shelters and digital ads will be variations of these. I believe the Nasdaq jumbotron will not have a mooch monster (yes, @selviano?). [ redacted, intending to share privately before Oct 8 ] Here's a first look at what folks will see if/when they visit the website (more on #6): |
correct, Nasdaq will be a discrete design, featuring our partner logos and congratulating them all on the launch/commitment
… On Aug 29, 2024, at 3:58 AM, Chad Whitacre ***@***.***> wrote:
We have OOH designs! Here are the final drafts of the three SF billboards, featuring what Sentry's creative team is calling "mooch monsters." The bus shelters and digital ads will be variations of these. I believe the Nasdaq jumbotron will not have a mooch monster (yes, @selviano <https://github.com/selviano>?).
ceo.jpg (view on web) <https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b9b36601-7f9e-47d9-b26b-559258a8f076>
cfo.jpg (view on web) <https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11090ebc-5490-41ca-b588-8c501c3526f3>
cto.jpg (view on web) <https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/57d4ce1e-f77e-496d-84d9-01e7d45cff3e>
Here's a first look at what folks will see if/when they visit the website (more on #6 <#6>):
oss-home.png (view on web) <https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1723d631-cf99-4190-ba59-b76eeb5ae4f8>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#11 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXFS7GGHJR64B36IHV5ZMMTZT35D7AVCNFSM6AAAAABKZO77BOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJXGMZDCNJXGU>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
@selviano is putting together a promo packet to include:
@Ethan-Arrowood What do you think of sending an email to foundation launch partners next week with the promo packet and invitation to market with us on Oct 8 and following? Here's an initial list of likelies:
P.S. I started openjs-foundation/sustainability-collab-space#12 to work it through with OpenJS. |
@Ethan-Arrowood @selviano and I had a call to workshop this. We're aiming to update our partner interest email list and send out a launch coordination email by EOW at the latest. Here's our working doc 🔒. |
They tell me ads are live on multiple platforms. I'm gonna close this out. The horse is out of the gate! |
We are launching a major promotional campaign for the Pledge on October 8.
Components
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: