Put ChatGPT back in the zoo behind bars

[jidanni]

On #9616 (comment) we see ChatGPT has been let loose here on the iD issues.

Well, it's so happens that the quality of its responses are even worse than the ones that I make. And you can't beat that.

Therefore it should be put back in the zoo behind bars where it belongs and not competing (with me) for worst poster grand prize.

I mean, maybe it's useful for battling helping normal users. But not us bug reporters.

Sure it makes highly polished responses but in the corners it reveals that nobody's actually home up there in the brain department.

[1ec5]

For the avoidance of doubt, that “on behalf of” signature line is a signature ChatGPT line. iD doesn’t have a regular customer support team or product management staff (though I played one on TV once 😛). I’m converting this issue into a discussion, because I don’t think it’s actionable with respect to the iD codebase but is perhaps a valid topic of discussion.

[ZeLonewolf]

And for the avoidance of doubt, I am highlighting the overwhelming volume of iD issues and the limited number of people actively working on them.

[tyrasd]

@ZeLonewolf please note that trolling is not tolerated by the project's code of conduct. If I understood you correctly, I'm acknowledging your posts as a form of satire. But going forward I would appreciate actually constructive feedback instead of mockery. I've marked your respective posts as spam, as they don't contribute anything of value for the actual discussion.