How a mediation recipient does make a connection with a mediator #429
jakubkoci
started this conversation in
Architecture & Design
Replies: 3 comments
-
When using a public did you can use it as an implicit invitation. So I'd say the second option:
Specific reason not to use it? I'd like to add a did resolver in the near future that can use did resolvers from that library. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
It provides some nice features with regards to did url parsing and caching etc. https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-resolver Related issue: #172 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I'm not saying we shouldn't use it, just it's not necessary to have at least some improvement on the way forward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We started the discussion in #250, but it deserves its own issue.
It seems there is no specification of how it should work. It's a question of whether it should be part of the framework. In any case, I would like to understand how to solve it :)
I like the idea with did:web method and having
https://w3c-ccg.github.io/.well-known/did.json
on mediator server where an edge agent can find DID Document with service and keys. We don't even need to have web-did-resolver at the start.But I'm not sure how to continue from there.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions