How understand value about size during enabled dedup and compression on zpool volume #16783
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
When you are looking on pool stats, it shows raw space (including parity) for RAIDZ, that is why there was 31.3TiB vs 20TiB originally reported free/available. Another factor here is huge dedup ratio you've got, that you may see in the pool stats. Since dedup does not work on dataset level, ZFS can not report it there, so it inflates pool capacity, as if all the data you have written are really stored somewhere. The 18TiB of space reported as available for dataset should be right, if you finally start writing real unique data. And it matches FREE reported for the pool if you compensate for parity. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
When you are looking on pool stats, it shows raw space (including parity) for RAIDZ, that is why there was 31.3TiB vs 20TiB originally reported free/available. Another factor here is huge dedup ratio you've got, that you may see in the pool stats. Since dedup does not work on dataset level, ZFS can not report it there, so it inflates pool capacity, as if all the data you have written are really stored somewhere. The 18TiB of space reported as available for dataset should be right, if you finally start writing real unique data. And it matches FREE reported for the pool if you compensate for parity.